实验研究

基于生物信息学分析的自噬相关基因在糖尿病足溃疡患者肢端微循环损害中的模型构建

展开
  • 1.无锡市中医医院中医外科,  江苏   无锡    214000;    2. 无锡市中医医院普外科,  江苏   无锡    214000;    3. 江苏省人民医院血管外科,  江苏   南京    210029
宋潇逸(1990-),女,主治中医师,硕士研究生,研究方向:中医药治疗糖尿病足,E-mail: songxiaoyi01230@yeah.vin

收稿日期: 2025-06-18

  网络出版日期: 2026-06-22

基金资助

中国博士后科学基金(2023M731408)

Modelling of autophagy-related genes in microcirculatory damage at the extremities of patients with diabetic foot ulcers based on bioinformatics analysis

Expand
  • 1. Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine Surgery,Wuxi Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine; Wuxi 214000, Jiangsu, China; 2. General Surgery, Wuxi Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine; Wuxi 214000, Jiangsu, China; 3. Vascular Surgery, Jiangsu Provincial People's Hospital, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu, China

Received date: 2025-06-18

  Online published: 2026-06-22

摘要

目的    基于生物信息学构建自噬相关基因(ATGs)在糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)患者肢端微循环损害中的模型,探索相关机制及诊疗靶点。  方法    从GEO数据库获取GSE 134431、GSE 80178和GSE 68183数据集,分别作为训练集与验证集。数据进行预处理、归一化及批次校正后,进行聚类分析、GO和GSVA富集分析、WGCNA模块识别,并利用多种机器学习方法构建预测模型,通过列线图、校准曲线和决策曲线评估性能。 结果    共筛选出20个差异表达基因。聚类分析将患者分为有无微循环损害两组。GO分析显示基因显著富集于自噬相关结构、泛素连接酶结合及细胞应激反应等过程。GSVA提示自噬、线粒体自噬和FoxO通路显著富集。SVM模型性能最优(AUC=1.000),验证集AUC为0.929,关键基因包括BNIP3、HEPHL1、KLK10等。  结论    ATGs通过调控线粒体自噬和FoxO通路参与DFU微循环损害,SVM模型具有良好预测能力,为临床诊断与靶向治疗提供依据。

本文引用格式

宋潇逸, 唐张锋, 桂亮 . 基于生物信息学分析的自噬相关基因在糖尿病足溃疡患者肢端微循环损害中的模型构建[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2026 , 44(3) : 296 -304 . DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2026.3.08

Abstract

Objective    To construct a model of autophagy-related genes (ATGs) in the microcirculatory damage of extremities in patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) based on bioinformatics analysis, and explore the related mechanisms and diagnostic/therapeutic targets.   Methods   Datasets GSE 134431, GSE 80178, and GSE 68183 were obtained from the GEO database, serving as training and validation sets, respectively. After data preprocessing, normalization, and batch correction, cluster analysis, GO and GSVA enrichment analysis, and WGCNA module identification were performed. Multiple machine learning methods were used to build prediction models, and performance was evaluated using nomograms, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis.   Results   A total of 20 differentially expressed genes were identified. Cluster analysis divided patients into 2 groups based on the presence or absence of microcirculatory damage. GO analysis revealed significant enrichment of genes in autophagosome-related structures, ubiquitin ligase binding, and cellular stress response processes. GSVA indicated significant enrichment in autophagy, mitophagy, and FoxO signaling pathways. The SVM model performed best (AUC=1.000), with an AUC of 0.929 in the validation set. Key genes included BNIP3, HEPHL1, and KLK10.   Conclusions   ATGs are involved in DFU microcirculatory damage by regulating mitophagy and the FoxO pathway. The SVM model demonstrates strong predictive ability, providing a basis for clinical diagnosis and targeted therapy.

参考文献

[1]  Armstrong DG, Tan TW, Boulton AJM, et al. Diabetic foot ulcers: A review[J]. JAMA, 2023, 330(1): 62-75. DOI:10.1001/jama.2023.10578
[2]  Bolton L. Diabetic foot ulcer: treatment challenges[J]. Wounds, 2022, 34(6): 175-177. DOI:10.25270/wnds/2022.175177
[3]  Pruthi S, Siddiqui E, Smilowitz NR. Beyond coronary artery disease: Assessing the microcirculation[J]. Interv Cardiol Clin, 2023, 12(1): 119-129. DOI:10.1016/j.iccl.2022.09.010
[4]  Liu S, Yao S, Yang H, et al. Autophagy: Regulator of cell death[J]. Cell Death Dis, 2023, 14(10): 648-648. DOI:10.1038/s41419-023-06154-8
[5] Klionsky DJ, Petroni G, Amaravadi RK, et al. Autophagy in major human diseases[J]. EMBO J, 2021, 40(19): e108863. DOI:10.15252/embj.2021108863
[6] Cui K, Li Z. Identification and analysis of type 2 diabetes-mellitus-associated autophagy-related genes[J]. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2023, 14(1): 1164112. DOI:10.3389/fendo.2023.1164112
[7] Wang L, Tian H, Wang H, et al. Disrupting circadian control of autophagy induces podocyte injury and proteinuria[J]. Kidney Int, 2024, 105(5): 1020-1034. DOI:10.1016/j.kint.2024.01.035
[8]  Yang YY, Gao ZX, Mao ZH, et al. Identification of ULK1 as a novel mitophagy-related gene in diabetic nephropathy[J]. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2023, 13(1): 1079465. DOI:10.3389/fendo.2022.1079465
[9] Ramirez HA, Pastar I, Jozic I, et al. Staphylococcus aureus triggers induction of miR-15B-5P to diminish DNA repair and deregulate infammatory response in diabetic foot ulcers[J]. J Invest Dermatol, 2018, 138(5): 1187-1196. DOI:10.1016/j.jid.2017.11.038
[10]Sawaya AP, Stone RC, Brooks SR, et al. Deregulated immune cell recruitment orchestrated by FOXM1 impairs human diabetic wound healing[J]. Nat Commun, 2020, 11(1): 4678. DOI:10.1038/s41467-020-18276-0
[11]Stone A, Donohue CM. Diabetic foot ulcers in geriatric patients[J]. Clin Geriatr Med, 2024, 40(3): 437-447. DOI:10.1016/j.cger.2024.03.002
[12]Aldana PC, Cartron AM, Khachemoune A. Reappraising diabetic foot ulcers: A focus on mechanisms of ulceration and clinical evaluation[J]. Int J Low Extrem Wounds, 2022, 21(3): 294-302. DOI:10.1177/15347 34620944514
[13]Falhammar H. Diabetic foot ulcers - The time to act is now[J]. Indian J Med Res, 2022, 156(4&5): 570-572. DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_2116_22
[14]Jeffcoate W, Boyko EJ, Game F, et al. Causes, prevention, and management of diabetes-related foot ulcers. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2024, 12(7): 472-482. DOI:10.1016/S2213-8587(24)00110-4
[15]韩志芬, 康彧, 王渠, 等. 超声造影在评价糖尿病足溃疡患者肢端微循环损害中的应用价值[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2023, 39(5): 573-576. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-0101.2023.05.028.
      Han ZF, Kang Y, Wang Q, et al. Application Value of Ultrasound Contrast in Evaluating Microcirculatory Impairment in Diabetic Foot Ulcer Patients [J]. Chinese Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2023, 39(5): 573-576. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-0101.2023.05.028.
[16]Salemkour Y, Lenoir O. Endothelial autophagy dysregulation in diabetes[J]. Cells. 2023, 12(6): 947. DOI:10.3390/cells12060947
[17]Ou Y, Zhao YL, Su H. Pancreatic β-Cells, diabetes and autophagy[J]. Endocr Res, 2025, 50(1): 12-27. DOI:10.1080/07435800.2024.2413064
[18]Arden C, Park SH, Yasasilka XR, et al. Autophagy and lysosomal dysfunction in diabetes and its complications[J]. Trends Endocrinol Metab, 2024, 35(12): 1078-1090. DOI:10.1016/j.tem.2024.06.010
[19]Li X, Luo W, Tang Y, et al. Semaglutide attenuates doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity by ameliorating BNIP3-Mediated mitochondrial dysfunction[J]. Redox Biol, 2024, 72(1): 103129. DOI:10.1016/j.redox. 2024.103129
[20]Yang C, Yi B, Yang S, et al. VDR restores the expression of PINK1 and BNIP3 in TECs of streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice[J]. Life Sci Alliance, 2024, 7(7): e202302474. DOI:10.26508/lsa.202302474
[21]Gil J, Marques-Pamies M, Valassi E, et al. Molecular characterization of epithelial-mesenchymal transition and medical treatment related-genes in non-functioning pituitary neuroendocrine tumors[J]. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2023, 14(1):1129213. DOI:10.3389/fendo.2023. 1129213
[22]Williams D, Mahmoud M, Liu R,et al. Stable flow-induced expression of KLK10 inhibits endothelial inflammation and atherosclerosis[J]. Elife, 2022, 11(1):e72579. DOI:10.7554/eLife.72579
[23] Oh SJ, Lee MS. Role of autophagy in the pathogenesis of diabetes and therapeutic potential of autophagy modulators in the treatment of diabetes and metabolic syndrome[J]. J Korean Med Sci, 2022, 37(37): e276. DOI:10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e276
[24]Shan Z, Fa WH, Tian CR, et al. Mitophagy and mitochondrial dynamics in type 2 diabetes mellitus treatment[J]. Aging (Albany NY), 2022, 4(6): 2902-2919. DOI:10.18632/aging.203969
[25]Chen D, Chen X, He C, et al. Sanhuang xiexin decoction synergizes insulin/PI3K-Akt/FoxO signaling pathway to inhibit hepatic glucose production and alleviate T2DM[J]. J Ethnopharmacol, 2023, 306(1): 116162. DOI:10.1016/j.jep.2023.116162
[26]Cui K, Li Z. Identification and analysis of type 2 diabetes-mellitus-associated autophagy-related genes[J]. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2023, 14(1): 1164112. DOI:10.3389/fendo.2023.1164112
文章导航

/