Complications analysis of percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation 

WANG Shi-cheng, PAN Lei, XUE Hou-jun, LEI Yu

Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy ›› 2020, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (5) : 605-608.

Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy ›› 2020, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (5) : 605-608. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2020.05.023

Complications analysis of percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation 

  • WANG Shi-cheng, PAN Lei, XUE Hou-jun, LEI Yu
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the surgical complications and prevention methods of percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy(PEID) for lumbar disc herniation. Methods Total of 56 cases with single-segment lumbar disc herniation underwent PEID surgery in our hospital were analyzed. The levels of herniation were L4/5 in 30 cases, L5/S1 in 26 cases. The visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores and JOA scores at preoperative and postoperative were observed to evaluate the clinical effects. The complications during operation and post-operation were studied respectively.  Results All cases were followed up, the VAS scores, ODI scores and JOA scores at 24 hours, 3 months and 12 months after operation were significantly improved as compared to those of pre-operative. The complications were found in 12 cases, with the incidence rate of 21.43%. In 3 cases, the neck pain was relieved by changing the pressure of the washing liquid, numbness of perineum was noted in 1 case, lumbago was noted in 4 cases and postoperative dysesthesia and weakness in 2 cases. Dural tear was found in 1 case, who recovered after posterior open lumbar discectomy immediately. 1 case had partial nerve root injury. All of the patients were recovered. There were no infection, no peritoneal and abdominal organ damage, no cauda equina nerve damage, no bad wound healing and no recurrence 1 year after operation. Conclusions  PEID has a good short-term effect in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation, but also has related complications. The operator should understand the possible complications and take corresponding preventive measures.

Key words

Lumbar disc herniation /  Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy /  Interlaminar approach /  Complication

Cite this article

Download Citations
WANG Shi-cheng, PAN Lei, XUE Hou-jun, LEI Yu. Complications analysis of percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy. 2020, 38(5): 605-608 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2020.05.023

References

[1] Nakamura JI, Yoshihara K. Initial clinical outcomes of percutaneous full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy using an interlaminar approach at the L4-L5[J]. Pain physician, 2017, 20(4): E507-E512.
[2] Jiang X, Zhou X. Clinical effects of transforaminal and interlaminar percutaneous endoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: A retrospective study[J]. Medicine,2018, 97( 48): e13417.
[3] Qin R, Liu B, Hao J, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy versus posterior open lumbar microdiscectomy for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation: a systemic review and meta-analysis[J]. World Neurosurg, 2018, 120: 352-362.
[4]  Passacantilli E, Lenzi J, Caporlingua F, et al. Endoscopic interlaminar approach for intracanal L5-S1 disc herniation: Classification of disc prolapse in relation to learning curve and surgical outcome[J]. Asian journal of endoscopic surgery, 2015, 8(4): 445-453.
[5] Nie H, Zeng J, Song Y, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for L5-S1 disc herniation via an interlaminar approach versus a transforaminal approach:a prospective randomized controlled study with 2-year follow up[J]. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976 ), 2016, 41(Suppl 19):B30-B37.
[6]  Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, et al. Full-endoscopic interlaminar and transforaminal lumbar discectomy versus conventional micro-surgical technique: a prospective, randomized, controlled study[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2008, 33 (9): 931-939.
[7]  Ahn Y, Kim CH, Lee JH, et al. Radiation exposure to the surgeon during percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy:a prospective study [J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2013, 38 (7): 617-625.
[8] Kim HS,Park JY.Comparative assessment of different percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar lumbar discectomy( PEID) techniques[J]. Pain Physician, 2013, 16( 4):359-67.
[9]  Joh JY, Choi G, Kong, BJ, et al. Comparative study of neck pain in relation to increase of cervical epidural pressure during percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy[J]. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976), 2009, 34(19):2033-2038.
[10]  Guan Y, Huang T, An G, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar lumbar discectomy with local anesthesia for L5-S1 disc herniation: A feasibility sStudy[J]. Pain Physician, 2019, 22(6):E649-E654. 
[11] Kitab SA, Miele VJ, Lavelle WF, et al. Pathoanatomic basis for stretch-induced lumbar nerve root injury with a review of the literature[J]. Neurosurgery, 2009, 65(1):161-168.
[12]Zhou C, Zhang G, Panchal RR, et al. Unique complications of percutaneous  endoscopic lumbar discectomy and percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy[J]. Pain Physician, 2018, 21(2):E105-E112. 

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/