Objective To investigate tip and torque characteristics of all teeth in patients with high-angle skeletal class III malocclusion in order to provide guidance for clinical treatment. Methods Dicom data of cone-beam CT (CBCT) of 24 patients with high-angle skeletal class I (13 patients) and III malocclusion (11 patients) meeting the inclusion criteria were collected. Tip and torque of all teeth (except the third molar) were measured respectively by the software Invivo5.1. Results (1) Inclination angle of the same name teeth had a good consistency in high-angle skeletal class I class III, P>0.05; the data of the same name teeth were processed together hereinafter. (2) Comparison of sagittal direction between class III and I. In class Ⅲ malocclusion: ① It was showing a trend of increase in the lingual root torque of the anterior upper teeth, but only the canines had significant differences, P<0.05; ② Lingual root torque of anterior lower teeth had decreased with significant difference, P<0.05.③ There was no significant difference in the trend of mesio-inclination of the upper posterior teeth and distal inclination of the lower posterior teeth, P>0.05. (3)Horizontal comparison of direction of skeletal class I and Ⅲ: ①The distal inclination of the anterior teeth in the upper jaw increased with significant difference and only distal inclination of incisors of the lower jaw increased in significant differnce, P<0.05. ② Lingual root torque significantly increased in the upper posterior teeth but decreased in the lower posterior teeth without statistical differnce. (4) Comparison of high-angle skeletal I and III with normal sagittal and coronal inclination of Andrews: ① Sagittal direction: lingual root torque of the upper and lower anterior teeth of high-angle skeletal I and III increased and the upper and lower posterior teeth had significant mesio-inclination. ② Coronal direction: the distal inclination of the upper and lower anterior teeth of skeletal I and III with high angle increased, while the lingual torque of the upper and lower posterior teeth increased. Conclusions (1)The vertical compensation of high-angle skeletal class Ⅲ is more significant than that of sagittal compensation. (2) High-angle skeletal class Ⅲ of upper and lower anterior teeth have much higher risk of bucco (labial)-lingual tilting movement, and more attention should be paid to the overall movement of teeth when moving. (3) The posterior teeth of maxilla have obvious buccal inclination in high-angle skeletal class III and the lateral extension range of the upper dentition decreases, which may reduce the stability after arch expansion.
Key words
High- angle /
Skeletal class Ⅲmalocclusion /
Tip /
Torque
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1] Jia Y, Yang H, Li P, et al. Cone beam computed tomography analysis in 3D position of maxillary denture[J] .Open Med (Wars), 2017, 12: 340-346.
[2] 刘娟, 贾莹, 杨桦, 等. 骨性Ⅲ类错牙合体分段长轴倾斜方向的一致性评价[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2016, 34(2): 165-170.
[3] 杨桦, 贾莹, 王永. 骨性Ⅲ类错牙合下颌前部牙槽骨形态的 CT分析[J].实用医学杂志, 2015(9): 1478-1481.
[4] Eslami S , Faber J , Fateh A , et al. Treatment decision in adult patients with class III malocclusion: surgery versus orthodontics[J]. Prog Orthod, 2018, 19(1): 28.
[5] Martinez P , Bellot-Arcís C, Llamas JM , et al. Orthodontic camouflage versus orthognathic surgery for class III deformity: comparative cephalometric analysis[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2017, 46(4):490-495.
[6] 邹晨, 陈奕嘉, 吴志辉, 等. 不同矢状骨面型错牙合中切牙冠根角的锥形束CT分析[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2013, 7(2): 44-47.
[7] 皮昕. 口腔解剖生理学[M] .7版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2012: 76.
[8] Edwards JG. A study of the anterior portion of the palate as it relates to orthodontic therapy[J]. Am J Orthod, 1976, 69(3): 249-273.
[9] 傅民魁. 口腔正畸学[M]. 6版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2013: 111-113.
[10]许天民, 刘妍, 江久汇, 等. 正畸内收上切牙对上颌牙槽骨改建的临床研究[J]. 实用口腔医学杂志, 2004, 20(4): 431-433.
[11]唐娜, 赵志河, 廖春晖, 等. 成人骨性Ⅱ类与Ⅲ类错牙合畸形伴异常垂直骨面型的颏联合形态研究[J]. 华西口腔医学杂志, 2010, 28(4): 395-398.
[12] 陈嵘. 西安地区Ⅲ类错牙合颅面类型构成分析[D]. 西安: 第四军医大学, 2010.
[13] Koo YJ, Choi SH, Keum BT, et al. Maxillomandibular arch width differences at estimated centers of resistance comparison between normal occlusion and skeletal class III malocclusion[J]. Korean J Orthod, 2017, 47(3): 167-175.
[14]Chen F , Terada K , Wu L , et al. Dental arch widths and mandibularmaxillary base width in class III malocclusions with low, average and high MP-SN angles[J]. Angle Orthod, 2007, 77(1): 36-41.
[15]Kim H, Cha KS. Evaluation of the stability of maxillary expansion using cone- beam computed tomography after segmental Le Fort I osteotomy in adult patients with skeletal class III malocclusion[J]. Korean J Orthod, 2018, 48(1): 63-70.
[16]Braun S, Legan HL. Changes in occlusion related to the cant of the occlusal plane[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1997, 112(5): 184-188.
[17]李秀艳, 陈文静, 胡小坤. 反复扩缩式快速扩弓矫治器配合前方牵引矫治恒牙早期安氏Ⅲ类错牙合的临床疗效观察[J]. 口腔医学, 2011, 31(8): 482-484.
[18]Bui C, King T, Proffit W, et al. Phenotypic characterization of class III patients[J]. Angle Orthod, 2006, 76(4): 564-569.