The clinical study of PFNA and DHS internal fixation for intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly
LI Jian-chi, LIU Gang, XUE Xiao-hua, TAN Jia-qun, XU Zi-qiang, WU Chun-hui
Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy ›› 2017, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5) : 571-575.
The clinical study of PFNA and DHS internal fixation for intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly
Objective To investigate the clinical effects of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) and dynamic hip screw (DHS) internal fixation in the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly according to the anatomical features of type. Methods From July 2013 to May 2015 the 92 cases of elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture were selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, all were treated by surgical treatment. According to the random number table and the different internal fixation they were divided into a PFNA group (44 cases), and a DHS group (48 cases). The changes and complications of the two groups were recorded and compared. Results The average radiation time was shorter and the occult blood loss less in the DHS group than in the PFNA group, while the average blood loss in PFNA group was less than that in the DHS group. There was no significant difference in the average operation time, length of stay, time of beginning getting out of bed and do movement, the time of fracture healing and the function of the hip joint function in the two groups (P>0.05). The incidence of complications such as urinary tract infection, pulmonary infection, bedsore, deep venous thrombosis of lower limb(DVD), proximal screw head and neck incision, and coxavara rate difference was not statistically significant in two groups (P>0.05); The incidence of proximal screw withdrawal, pain in the lateral hip or thigh was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusions PFNA or DHS internal fixation, each with its own advantages and disadvantages, should be selected according to fracture type of intertrochanteric fracture in the elderly. However, as long as effective fixation was achieved, early exercise can reduce complications, and the hip function in the affected side can recover well.
Femur; Femoral intertrochanteric fracture; Internal fracture fixation; Osteoporosis;  / Old
[1] 邱贵兴,裴福兴,胡侦明,等. 中国骨质疏松性骨折诊疗指南[J]. 中华骨与关节外科杂志,2015, 8(5): 371-375.
[2] Foss NB, Kehlet H. Hidden blood loss after surgery for hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2006, 88(8): 1053-1059.
[3] 智春升,金冶华,刘军,等. 经皮解剖锁定接骨板与股骨近端防旋髓内钉治疗老年股骨转子间骨折的临床对比研究[J]. 中华骨与关节外科杂志,2015, 8(2):151-156.
[4] 张俊,蔡礼涛,任洋良,等. 高龄患者股骨粗隆间骨折内固定术式的选择分析[J]. 四川医学,2015, 36(12):1701-1703.
[5] 柴瑞宝. PFNA与解剖型锁定钢板治疗老年人股骨粗隆间骨折的临床比较研究[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志,2015, 23(16):1481-1484.
[6] 陈红卫,匡红,张根福,等. 微创动力髋螺钉治疗股骨转子间骨折[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志,2012, 28(12):1010-1013.
[7] 朱晓璐,田京. DHS加粗隆挡板治疗JensenⅢ型股骨粗隆间粉碎性骨折临床研究[J].中国临床解剖学杂志, 2012, 30(2):239-242.
[8] Kokoroghiannis C, Aktselis I, Deligeorgis A, et al. Evolving concepts of stability and intramedullary fixation of intertrochanteric fractures--a review. Injury, 2012, 43(6): 686-693.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |