经口前路寰枢椎侧块关节融合器的力学稳定性评价
收稿日期: 2013-12-08
网络出版日期: 2014-06-04
基金资助
军队临床高新技术重点项目（2010gxjs032）
Biomechanical evaluation of stability of implantation of transoralatlantoaxial lateral mass fusion cage
Received date: 2013-12-08
Online published: 2014-06-04
目的 评价经口前路寰枢椎侧块关节融合器在前路经口寰枢椎复位固定钢板（TARP）及后路寰枢椎椎弓根钉棒（后路C1-C2钉棒）固定下的力学稳定性，为临床应用提供理论依据。 方法 采用自行设计的经口前路寰枢侧块关节融合器，将6具新鲜上颈椎标本，随机分为完整对照组(M)、前路TARP+髂骨块组(A1)、前路TARP+cage组(A2)、后路C1-C2钉棒＋髂骨块组(B1)、后路C1-C2钉棒＋cage组(B2)。 利用Motion Analysis, co.6 Eagle系统对屈伸、侧屈、旋转方向运动范围（ROM）进行测量，并行统计学分析。 结果 相同固定方式组间比较，cage组比髂骨块组运动范围更小，屈伸方向稳定性依次为A2＞B2＞A1＞B1， 其中A1与A2比较， 有显著性差异（P=0.0125）， B1与B2比较， 有显著性差（P=0.0132）；相同置入物组间比较， 前路TARP与后路C1-C2钉棒固定力学稳定性无显著性差异(P>0.05)。 结论 寰枢椎融合术中使用cage比髂骨块具有更好的三维稳定性、理论上能够提高寰枢椎融合率，减少并发症。
张皓南 , 尹庆水 , 刘桂英 , 杨涛 , 黄文华 . 经口前路寰枢椎侧块关节融合器的力学稳定性评价[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2014 , 32(3) : 348 -350 . DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.201
Objective To evaluatethe biomechanical properties of the fusion cage combined with Type ⅢTransoralAtlantoaxial Reduction Plate(TARP) system and posterior C1-C2 pedicle screw-rods system. Methods 6 fresh-frozen human cervical spines were used for study in five different groups. Range of motion (ROM) in flexion-extension, left-right bending, and axial rotation was recorded by Motion Analysis, co.6 Eagle. Results According to the anatomic data, the ring shape of the cage was feasible and the parameters: 3.5 mm height, 6 mm inner diameter, and 12mmouter diameter. The cage was made of Poly Ether EtherKetone(peek).The difference in stiffness between the TARP and C1-C2screw-rods was not statistically significant in the same implant groups. The ROM of cage groups was smaller compared with ilium groups and the difference in flexion-extension was statistically significant. Conclusions TARP system fixation or pedicle screw-rods fixation was significantly stiffer than the iliumgroup in atlantoaxial fusion. Moreover, smaller postoperative complications render it to have a better prospect of clinical application in clinical practice.
Key words： Atlantoaxial; Anterior approach; Cage; Bionmechanics
[1] 丁祥, 牛国旗. 前路寰枢椎内固定的研究进展与展望
[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2013, 31(1):112-114.
[2] Kuroki H, Rengachary SS, Goel VK, et al. Biomechanical comparison of two stabilization techniques of the atlantoaxial joints: transarticular screw fixation versus screw and rod fixation
[J]. Neurosurgery, 2005, 56（1Suppl）:151-159.
[3] 石林, 夏虹, 赵卫东, 等. 第Ⅲ代经口寰枢椎复位钢板系统三维稳定性评价
[J].中国临床解剖学杂志, 2012, 30(3): 342-344.
[4] Crawford NR, Hurlbert RJ, Choi WG, et al. Differential biomechanical effects of injury and wiring at C1–C2
[J].Spine, 1999, 24(18):1894.
[5] 艾福志, 尹庆水, 王智运, 等. 经口咽前路寰枢椎复位钢板内固定的外科解剖学研究
[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2004, 42(21): 1325-1329.
[6] Resnick DK, Benzel EC. C1-C2 pedicle screw fixation with rigid cantilever beam construct: case report and technical note
[J].Neurosurgery, 2002, 50(2): 426-428.
[7] Richter M, Schmidt R, Claes L, et al. Posterior atlantoaxial fixation: biomechanical in vitro comparison of six different techniques
[J]. Spine, 2002, 27(16):1724-1732.
[8] Melcher RP, Puttlitz CM, Kleinstueck FS, et al. Biomechanical testing of posterior atlantoaxial fixation techniques
[J].Spine, 2002, 27(22):2435-2440.
[9] 马向阳, 尹庆水, 吴增晖, 等. 寰枢椎后路四种钉棒固定方法的三维稳定性评价
[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2008, 18( 6): 464-468.
[10]Kandziora F，Pflugmacher R，Ludwig K，et al. Biomechanical comparison of four anterior atlantoaxial plate systems
[J]. J Neurosurg，2002，96（3）:313-320.
[11]吴峰, 尹庆水. 经口咽前路寰枢椎复位钢板螺钉固定强度的生物力学评价
[J].中国临床解剖学杂志, 2010, 28(5): 575-577.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
京ICP备08002354号-3
