临床研究

基于早期加速康复比较小切口与传统开放手术治疗急性跟腱断裂的临床疗效

展开
  • 1. 南方医科大学第三附属医院足踝外科,  广东   广州    510630;    2.自贡市第一人民医院足踝外科,  四川  自贡   643000
陈浩铭(1999-),男,硕士,医师,主要从事足踝外科和骨肉瘤的研究,E-mail: 2579187619@qq.com;并列第一作者:黄倦羽(1998-),男,硕士,医师,E-mail: 807848263@qq.com

收稿日期: 2025-03-01

  网络出版日期: 2025-06-24

基金资助

广东省基础与应用基础研究基金(2022A1515012479);南方医科大学第三附属医院院长基金(YM202209、YP202216)

Clinical efficacy comparison of early accelerated rehabilitation with minimal incision and traditional open surgery in the treatment of acute Achilles  tendon rupture

Expand
  • 1. Department of Foot and Ankle Surgery, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510630, Guangdong Province, China; 2. Department of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Zigong First People's Hospital, Zigong 643000, Sichuan Province, China

Received date: 2025-03-01

  Online published: 2025-06-24

摘要

目的    回顾比较小切口与传统开放修复联合早期加速康复治疗急性跟腱断裂的疗效。  方法  分为小切口组(n=22)与开放组(n=23)手术治疗急性跟腱断裂患者,所有患者均实施早期加速康复。分析术后ATRS、VAS评分、影像学检查、副损伤发生率、跟腱再断裂率、手术时长、住院时长、重返运动时长以及患者满意度。  结果  小切口组术后3月ATRS评分高于开放组,两组患者术后VAS评分、术后12月ATRS评分无明显差异。小切口组与开放组出现1/1例切口浅层组织感染,1/3例深层组织感染。两组患者术后1年影像学检查均未发现再断裂病例。小切口组较开放组患者“高满意度”高。结论  基于早期加速康复方案,小切口与传统开放修复均能使患者获得较好的疗效,但小切口组患者术后切口满意度高,术后恢复更快,因此小切口修复技术联合早期加速康复方案可作为急性跟腱断裂手术治疗的一种可行性选择。

本文引用格式

陈浩铭, 黄倦羽, 黄奕源, 曾参军, 黎润光 . 基于早期加速康复比较小切口与传统开放手术治疗急性跟腱断裂的临床疗效[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2025 , 43(3) : 358 -365 . DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2025.3.17

Abstract

Objective    To compare retrospectively the efficacy of small incision and traditional open repair combined with early accelerated rehabilitation in the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture.   Methods   Patients with acute Achilles tendon rupture were divided into a small incision group (n=22) and an open group (n=23) for surgical treatment. All patients underwent early accelerated rehabilitation. Postoperative Achilles Tendon Rupture Score (ATRS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, imaging examination, incidence of secondary injury, Achilles tendon re-rupture rate, operation time, hospitalization time, return to sports time and patient satisfaction were analyzed.    Results    The ATRS of the small incision group was higher than that of the open group 3 months after surgery. There was no significant difference in the postoperative VAS score and ATRS 12 months after surgery between the two groups. In the small incision group and the open group, 1/1 case had superficial tissue infection and 1/3 had deep tissue infection. No re-rupture cases were found in the imaging examination of the two groups 1 year after surgery. The patients with "high satisfaction" of the small incision group was higher than that of the open group.   Conclusions   Based on the early accelerated rehabilitation program, both small incision and traditional open repair can achieve better therapeutic effects for patients, but the patients in the small incision group have higher postoperative satisfaction with the incision and faster postoperative recovery. Therefore, small incision repair technology combined with early accelerated rehabilitation program can be used as a feasible choice for surgical treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture.

参考文献

[1] Park S-H, Lee H S, Young K W, et al. Treatment of Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture [J]. Clin Orthop Surg, 2020, 12(1): 1-8. DOI: 10.4055/cios.2020.12.1.1.
[2]  陈传煌, 杨涛, 李文庆, 等. 急性跟腱断裂微创与传统修复方法的比较 [J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2014, 32(4): 487-490. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2014.04.028.
      Chen CH, Yang T, Li WQ, et al. Minimally invasive versus conventional method repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2014, 32(4): 487-490. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2014.04.028.
[3]  Grassi A, Amendola A, Samuelsson K, et al. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Repair for Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture: Meta-Analysis Showing Reduced Complications, with Similar Outcomes, After Minimally Invasive Surgery [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2018, 100(22): 1969-1981. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01364.
[4]  Attia AK, Mahmoud K, D'hooghe P, et al. Outcomes and Complications of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Repair of Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials [J]. Am J Sports Med, 2023, 51(3): 825-836. DOI: 10.1177/03635465211053619.
[5] Patel MS, Kadakia AR. Minimally Invasive Treatments of Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures [J]. Foot Ankle Clin, 2019, 24(3): 399-424. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcl.2019.05.002.
[6]  Bragg JT, Ruelos VCB, Mcintyre JA, et al. Reverse Fragility Index Comparing Rates of Rerupture After Open Achilles Tendon Repair Versus Early Functional Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials [J]. Am J Sports Med, 2024, 52(4): 1116-1121. DOI: 10.1177/03635465231178831.
[7]  Porter MD, Shadbolt B. Randomized controlled trial of accelerated rehabilitation versus standard protocol following surgical repair of ruptured Achilles tendon [J]. ANZ J Surg, 2015, 85(5): 373-377. DOI: 10.1111/ans.12910.
[8] Irfan SA, Ahmed S, Ashkar A, et al. Comparative effectiveness of weight-bearing strategies on functional recovery in acute Achilles tendon rupture: A network meta-analysis [J]. Foot Ankle Surg, 2025. DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2025.02.013.
[9]  Braunstein M, Baumbach SF, Boecker W, et al. Development of an accelerated functional rehabilitation protocol following minimal invasive Achilles tendon repair [J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2018, 26(3): 846-853. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-015-3795-1.
[10]Gould HP, Bano JM, Akman JL, et al. Postoperative Rehabilitation Following Achilles Tendon Repair: A Systematic Review [J]. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev, 2021, 29(2): 130-145. DOI: 10.1097/JSA.0000000000000309.
[11]Won Lee K, Bae J-Y, Ho BC, et al. Immediate Weightbearing and Ankle Motion Exercise After Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture Repair [J]. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2022, 61(3):604-608. DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2021. 10.021.
[12]Maempel JF, Clement ND, Duckworth AD, et al. A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Traditional Plaster Cast Rehabilitation With Functional Walking Boot Rehabilitation for Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures [J]. Am J Sports Med, 2020, 48(11): 2755-2764. DOI: 10.1177/0363546520944905.
[13]Xu XY, Gao S, Lv Y, et al. Duration of immobilisation after Achilles tendon rupture repair by open surgery: a retrospective cohort study [J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2021, 16(1): 196. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02342-4.
[14]Valkering K P, Aufwerber S, Ranuccio F, et al. Functional weight-bearing mobilization after Achilles tendon rupture enhances early healing response: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial [J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2017, 25(6): 1807-1816. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-016-4270-3.
[15]Liu X, Dai TJ, Li BL, et al. Early functional rehabilitation compared with traditional immobilization for acute Achilles tendon ruptures : a meta-analysis [J]. Bone Joint J, 2021, 103-B(6): 1021-1030. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B6.BJJ-2020-1890.R1.
[16]Marrone W, Andrews R, Reynolds A, et al. Rehabilitation and Return to Sports after Achilles Tendon Repair [J]. Int J Sports Phys Ther, 2024, 19(9): 1152-1165. DOI: 10.26603/001c.122643.
[17]Mccormack R, Bovard J. Early functional rehabilitation or cast immobilisation for the postoperative management of acute Achilles tendon rupture? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials [J]. Br J Sports Med, 2015, 49(20): 1329-1335. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-094935.
[18]Bak BM, Seow D, Teo YZE, et al. Return to Play and Functional Outcomes Following Treatment of Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J]. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2024, 63(3): 420-429. DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2023.12.008.
[19]Langberg H, Rosendal L, Kjaer M. Training-induced changes in peritendinous type I collagen turnover determined by microdialysis in humans [J]. J Physiol, 2001, 534(Pt 1): 297-302. DOI: 
[20]Jin WT, Huang LF, Guo HH, et al. Two mini transverse-incision repair yields better results than percutaneous repair for acute closed midsubstance Achilles tendon rupture: a retrospective case-control study [J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2024, 19(1): 452. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-04904-8.
[21]Gatz M, Driessen A, Eschweiler J, et al. Open versus minimally-invasive surgery for Achilles tendon rupture: a meta-analysis study [J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2021, 141(3): 383-401. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-020-03437-z.
[22]熊洪涛, 庄永青, 傅小宽, 等. 两种入路手术治疗闭合性跟腱断裂43例临床分析 [J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2017, 35(3): 322-326. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2017.03.018.
       Xiong HT, Zhuang YQ, Fu XK, et al. Clinical analysis of two surgical approaches for treatment of closed rupture of Achilles tendon in 43 cases [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2017, 35(3): 322–326. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2017.03.018.
[23]Xu L, Jin J, Liu Z, et al. A New Technique of Achilles Tendon Rupture Repaired by Double Transverse Mini-incision to Avoid Sural Nerve Injury: A Consecutive Retrospective Study [J]. Orthop Surg, 2023, 15(2): 517-524. DOI: 10.1111/os.13615.
[24]Wei S, Chen J, Kong C, et al. Endoscopic "internal splinting" repair technique for acute Achilles tendon rupture [J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2021, 141(10): 1753-1760. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-03818-y.
文章导航

/