目的 比较抽吸取栓术和抽吸结合支架取栓术治疗脑前循环栓塞的疗效和安全性。 方法 收集广州市番禺区中心医院2020年1月至2022年6月诊断脑前循环栓塞且接受急诊取栓手术治疗的病例，根据取栓方式不同，分为抽吸取栓组（40例）和抽吸结合支架取栓组（64例）。比较两组NIHSS评分、良好预后率（mRS评分≤2分），取栓后血管再通率（mTICI评分≥2b），围手术期并发症等。 结果 术前较术后、术前较出院NIHSS评分变化，以及出院时、90 d良好预后率，抽吸取栓组显著优于抽吸结合支架取栓组。两组血管再通率、不良事件发生率无显著差异。 结论 对于前循环脑栓塞患者，抽吸取栓术相较抽吸联合支架取栓术可能具有更好的神经功能缺损改善效果及预后，两者在血管再通率和围手术期并发症发生率方面无显著差异。
Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of aspiration thrombectomy and thrombectomy combined with aspiration and stent retriever for the treatment of anterior circulation cerebral embolism. Methods Patients with anterior circulation cerebral embolism and treated with emergency thrombectomy surgery at Guangzhou Panyu Central Hospital from January 2020 to June 2022 were enrolled in this study. They were divided into two groups based on the thrombectomy method received: an aspiration thrombectomy group (40 cases) and a thrombectomy combined with aspiration and stent retriever group (64 cases). The NIHSS score, good prognosis rate (mRS score ≤ 2), post-thrombectomy vessel recanalization rate (mTICI score ≥ 2b), and perioperative complication rate were compared between the two groups. Results The change of NIHSS score from preoperative to postoperative, the good prognosis rate at the time of discharge and at 90 days after discharge, the thrombectomy group were significantly better than those in the thrombectomy with combined aspiration and stent retriever group. There were no significant differences in the rates of successful vessel recanalization and adverse events between the two groups. Conclusions Compared with the thrombectomy combined with aspiration and stent retriever, aspiration thrombectomy may lead to better improvement in neurological function deficits and good prognosis rates for patients with anterior circulation cerebral embolism. There is no significant difference in the rates of successful vessel recanalization and perioperative complications between the two approaches.
[1] Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH, et al. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials[J]. Lancet, 2016, 387(10029): 1723-1731. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00163-X.
[2] Lapergue B, Blanc R, Gory B, et al. ASTER trial investigators. effect of endovascular contact aspiration vs stent retriever on revascularization in patients with acute ischemic stroke and large vessel occlusion: the aster randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA, 2017, 318(5): 443-452. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.9644.
[3] Turk AS 3rd, Siddiqui A, Fifi JT, et al. Aspiration thrombectomy versus stent retriever thrombectomy as first-line approach for large vessel occlusion (COMPASS): a multicentre, randomised, open label, blinded outcome, non-inferiority trial[J]. Lancet, 2019, 393(10175): 998-1008. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30297-1.
[4] 中华医学会神经病学分会, 中华医学会神经病学分会脑血管病学组, 中华医学会神经病学分会神经血管介入协作组. 中国急性缺血性卒中早期血管内介入诊疗指南2022[J]. 中华神经科杂志, 2022, 55(6): 565-580. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn113694-20220225-00137.
[5] Jankowitz B, Grandhi R, Horev A, et al. Primary manual aspiration thrombectomy (MAT) for acute ischemic stroke: safety, feasibility and outcomes in 112 consecutive patients[J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2015, 7(1): 27-31. DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-011024.
[6] Kabbasch C, Möhlenbruch M, Stampfl S, et al. First-line lesional aspiration in acute stroke thrombectomy using a novel interm ediate catheter: initial experiences with the SOFIA[J]. Interv Neuroradiol, 2016, 22(3): 333-339. DOI: 10.1177/1591019916632370.
[7] Ghozy S, Kacimi SEO, Azzam AY, et al. Successful mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: revascularization grade and functional independence[J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2022, 14(8): 779-782. DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-018436.
[8] 吴学永, 万里飞, 李春梅, 等. 抽吸及支架取栓治疗心源性脑栓塞的疗效分析[J]. 哈尔滨医药, 2021, 41(4): 35-36. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8131.2021.04.016.
[9] Tonetti DA, Desai SM, Casillo S, et al. Stentriever salvage after failed manual aspiration thrombectomy[J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2019, 11(8): 747-750. DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014828.
[10] Consoli A, Rosi A, Coskun O, et al. Thrombectomy for M1-middle cerebral artery occlusion: angiographic aspect of the arterial occlusion and recanalization: a preliminary observation[J]. Stroke, 2018, 49(5): 1286-1289. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.018987.
[11] Kim YW, Son S, Kang DH, et al. Endovascular thrombectomy for M2 occlusions: comparison between forced arterial suction thrombectomy and stent retriever thrombectomy[J]. J Neurointerv Surg, 2017, 9(7): 626-630. DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012466.
[12] Xia L, Zhao PP, Sun HX, et al. Comparision of mechanical thrombectomy with contact aspiration or stent retriever in patients with large-vessel occlusion in acute ischemic stroke[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2021, 32(4): e364-e366. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000007264.
[13] Lee MJ, Park SJ, Yoon CH, et al. Association of left atrial enlargement with cortical infarction in subjects with patent foramen ovale[J]. J Stroke, 2016, 18(3): 304-311. DOI: 10.5853/jos.2016.00290.
[14] 窦文波, 曲方, 陈达, 等. 心源性脑栓塞14例尸检分析[J]. 中国医科大学学报, 2007, 36(2): 219-220. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-4646. 2007. 02. 046.
[15] Almekhlafi MA, Hu WY, Hill MD, et al. Calcification and endothelialization of thrombi in acute stroke[J]. Ann Neurol, 2008, 64(3): 344-348. DOI: 10.1002/ana.21404.
[16] Liebeskind DS, Sanossian N, Yong WH, et al. CT and MRI early vessel signs reflect clot composition in acute stroke[J]. Stroke, 2011, 42(5): 1237-1243. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.605576.
[17] Nishi H, Ishii A, Nakahara I, et al. Different learning curves between stent retrieval and a direct aspiration first-pass technique for acute ischemic stroke[J]. J Neurosurg, 2018, 129(6): 1456-1463. DOI: 10.3171/2017.6.JNS17872.
[18] 谈世东, 韦涛, 王磊, 等. 急性缺血性脑卒中抽吸取栓的研究进展[J]. 中国实用神经疾病杂志, 2022, 25(8): 1051-1056. DOI: 10.12083/SYSJ.220477.
京ICP备08002354号-3
