目的 测量正常成人下颈椎椎弓根的解剖学参数，探讨下颈椎前路椎弓根皮质骨螺钉内固定技术的可行性。 方法 随机选取80例正常成人颈椎CT影像资料，将扫描数据导入MIMICS 19.0软件。测量C3~C7椎体的椎弓根宽度（OPW）、椎弓根高度（OPH）、内侧皮质骨厚度（MCT）以及颈前路椎弓根皮质骨螺钉置钉参数，进行统计学分析。 结果 各节段左右两侧 OPH 和 MCT 参数的差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。测量男性的 OPH 和 OPW 参数均大于女性，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。C3~C4进钉点位于椎体正中矢状面椎弓根的对侧1.0~3.0 mm，距椎体上终板平面1.0~3.5 mm；C5进钉点位于椎体正中矢状面椎弓根同侧或对侧1.0~2.0 mm，距椎体上终板平面3.0~4.0 mm；C6~C7进钉点位于椎体正中矢状面椎弓根的同侧2.0~4.5 mm，距椎体上终板平面4.5~7.0 mm。C3~C7的皮质骨螺钉总体内倾角平均值分别是：39.13°、41.00°、40.91°、37.28°、31.84°，总体矢状角是：90.85°、97.23°、108.97°、111.60°、104.83°。螺钉的直径为3.5 mm，长度选择30 mm，32 mm较为适宜。 结论 下颈椎前路椎弓根皮质骨螺钉内固定技术在理论上具有可行性，并总结出置钉规律，为其下一步的临床应用提供了理论依据。
关键词：
皮质骨螺钉; ; ; 下颈椎; ; ; 解剖学; ; ; 椎弓根
Objective To investigate the feasibility of cortical bone trajectory for cervical anterior transpedicular screw fixation (ATPS) by measuring the anatomical characteristics of lower cervical pedicle. Methods Eighty sets adult healthy cervical specimens were randomly selected, and the scanned date were imported to the MIMICS 19.0 software. The following parameters in C3~C7 vertebrae: outer pedicle width (OPW) of vertebral body, outer pedicle height (OPH) of vertebral body, medial cortical shell thickness (MCT) of the pedicle, and the cortical bone screw parameters of ATPS were measured and analyzed statistically. Results There were significant differences in OPH and MCT between two sides of each segment (P<0.05). The OPH and OPW of each segment in males were greater than those of in females, with statistical differences (P<0.05). The entry point for C3 and C4 was 1.0-3.0 mm contralateral to the pedicle in the midsagittal plane of vertebra body, 1.0-3.5 mm from the upper end plate of vertebra body. The C5 entry point was 1.0-2.0 mm ipsilateral or contralateral to the pedicle in the midsagittal plane of vertebra body, 3.0-4.0 mm from the upper end plate of vertebra body. The entry point for C6 and C7 was 2.0-4.5 mm ipsilateral to the pedicle in the midsagittal plane of vertebra body, 4.5-7.0 mm from the upper end plate of vertebra body. At the cortical bone trajectory, the mean values of overall leaning angles from C3 to C7 were 39.13°, 41.00°, 40.91°, 37.28°,and 31.84° respectively, the mean values of overall sagittal angles from C3 to C7 were 90.85°, 97.23°, 108.97°, 111.60°, and 104.83° respectively. For ATPS, the diameters of cortical bone screw was 3.5 mm and the inserted length was 30 mm or 32 mm. Conclusions The cortical bone trajectory is a theoretically feasible option for ATPS, and the parameters inserting screw are established, which provides theoretical basis for its further clinical application.
[1] Koller H, Hempfing A, Acosta F, et al. Cervical anterior transpedicular screw fixation. Part I: Study on morphological feasibility, indications, and technical prerequisites[J]. Eur Spine J, 2008, 17(4):523-538. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0572-y.
[2] Yukawa Y, Kato F, Ito K, et al. Placement and complications of cervical pedicle screws in 144 cervical trauma patients using pedicle axis view techniques by fluoroscope[J]. Eur Spine J, 2009,18(9):1293-1299. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-1032-7.
[3] Yoshihara H, Passias PG, Errico TJ. Screw-related complications in the subaxial cervical spine with the use of lateral mass versus cervical pedicle screws: a systematic review[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2013,19(5):614-623. DOI: 10.3171/2013.8.SPINE13136.
[4] Santoni BG, Hynes RA, Mcgilvray KC, et al. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws[J]. Spine J, 2009, 9(5):366-373. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.07.008.
[5] Ueno M, Sakai R, Tanaka K, et al. Should we use cortical bone screws for cortical bone trajectory[J]? J Neurosurg Spine, 2015, 22(4):416-421. DOI: 10.3171/2014.9.SPINE1484.
[6] Matsukawa K, Yato Y, Kato T, et al. In vivo analysis of insertional torque during pedicle screwing using cortical bone trajectory technique[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2014, 39(4):E240-E245. DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000116.
[7] Panjabi MM, Shin EK, Chen NC, et al. Internal morphology of human cervical pedicles[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2000, 25(10):1197-1205. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200005150-00002.
[8] Jones EL, Heller JG, Silcox DH, et al. Cervical pedicle screws versus lateral mass screws. Anatomic feasibility and biomechanical comparison[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976),1997, 22(9):977-982. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199705010-00009.
[9] Sakamoto T, Neo M, Nakamura T. Transpedicular screw placement evaluated by axial computed tomography of the cervical pedicle[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2004, 29(22):2510-2514, 2515. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000144404.68486.85.
[10]Chanplakorn P, Kraiwattanapong C, Aroonjarattham K, et al. Morphometric evaluation of subaxial cervical spine using multi-detector computerized tomography (MD-CT) scan: the consideration for cervical pedicle screws fixation[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2014,15:125. DOI:10.1186/1471-2474-15-125.
[11] 徐荣明，赵刘军，马维虎，等. 下颈椎前路椎弓根螺钉内固定解剖学测量及临床应用[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2011,31(12):1337-1343. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2011.12.008.
[12] Aramomi M, Masaki Y, Koshizuka S, et al. Anterior pedicle screw fixation for multilevel cervical corpectomy and spinal fusion[J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2008,150(6):575-582. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-008-1574-1.
[13] Koller H, Hempfing A, Acosta F, et al. Cervical anterior transpedicular screw fixation. Part I: Study on morphological feasibility, indications, and technical prerequisites[J]. Eur Spine J, 2008, 17(4):523-538. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0572-y.
[14] Yukawa Y, Kato F, Ito K, et al. Anterior cervical pedicle screw and plate fixation using fluoroscope-assisted pedicle axis view imaging: a preliminary report of a new cervical reconstruction technique[J]. Eur Spine J,2009,18(6):911-916. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-0949-1.
[15] Zhao L, Li G, Liu J, et al. Radiological studies on the best entry point and trajectory of anterior cervical pedicle screw in the lower cervical spine[J]. Eur Spine J, 2014, 23(10):2175-2181. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3473-x.
[16] 李瑞峰，吴一民. 下颈椎经前路椎弓根置钉的应用解剖学研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2014，32(5):529-532. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2014.05.006.
[17] Nakashima H, Yukawa Y, Imagama S, et al. Complications of cervical pedicle screw fixation for nontraumatic lesions: a multicenter study of 84 patients[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2012,16(3):238-247. DOI: 10.3171/2011.11.SPINE11102.
[18] Ugur HC, Attar A, Uz A, et al. Surgical anatomic evaluation of the cervical pedicle and adjacent neural structures[J]. Neurosurgery, 2000, 47(5):1162-1168; discussion 1168-9. DOI: 10.1097/00006123-200011000-00029.
京ICP备08002354号-3
