目的 通过对颈椎椎间隙后缘骨赘的影像学测量,研究其临床意义。 方法 选取2016年9月至2017年12月收治的88例颈椎病患者(男36例,女52例),术前摄颈椎X线片,调阅PACS系统影像,以椎体下、上终板的切线(a线,b线)分别将相邻颈椎后缘骨赘分为上、下部(A上,A下,B上,B下),使用Auto CAD 2014版软件测量各部骨赘面积,计算切线上下骨赘面积与同侧骨赘总面积(A总,B总)的比值(Mean±SD)。 结果 本研究中后缘骨赘分为4型:Ⅰ型占61.36%,Ⅱ型5.68%,Ⅲ型10.22%,Ⅳ型22.72%。颈椎椎间隙后缘骨赘多发生于C5/6,占所有节段的43.18%。各节段的性别差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。上位椎体下缘a线以上存在骨赘者占总数比为32.94%,A上骨赘面积占该A总骨赘总面积的(41.18±15.45)%。下位椎体上缘b线以下存在骨赘者占总数比为28.40%,B下骨赘面积占该B总骨赘总面积的(54.69±22.49)%。 结论 在颈前路椎间盘切除减压融合术前通过分析颈椎后缘骨赘的影像学类型,规划术中处理后缘骨赘,可以达到更好的脊髓减压效果。
Objective To study the clinical value of cervical osteophytes in posterior margin of intervertebral space by imaging measurement. Methods 88 patients with cervical spondylosis, among which of 36 males and 52 females, were selected from September 2016 to December 2017. X-ray of cervical spine was taken, the system imaging of PACS was consulted before operation. The posterior edge osteophytes of cervical spine were divided into upper and lower parts (Aupper, Alower, Bupper, Blower) based on the tangent line of upper and lower endplate of the vertebral body respectively (Line a, Line b). The area of osteophytes of each part were measured by Auto CAD 2014 software. The ratio of the area of osteophytes of upper and lower parts and the total area of osteophytes of the same side (Aall, Ball) were calculated (Mean±SD). Results The posterior margin osteophytes were classified into four types. Type I accounted for 61.36% of the measured data, type II 5.68% type III 10.22%, and type IV 22.72%. Posterior marginal osteophytes of cervical intervertebral space were mainly located in C5/6, accounting for 43.18% of all segments. There was no statistical significance in gender of different segments. The percentage of osteophytes above the line-a of the lower edge of the upper vertebral body was 32.94%. The ratio of the area of Aupper osteophytes to the total area of Aall osteophytes was (41.18±15.45) %. The percentage of osteophytes below the line-b of the upper edge of the lower vertebral body was 28.40%. The ratio of Blower osteophyte area to total Ball osteophyte area was (54.69±22.49) %. Conclusions By analyzing the imaging types of osteophytes in posterior margin of cervical vertebra before operation, planning the treatment of osteophytes in posterior margin during operation, decompression-fusion of discectomy can obtain better effect in reducing pressure of spinal cord.
[1] Wen ZQ, Du JY, Ling ZH, et al. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion in the treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: systematic review and a meta-analysis[J]. Ther Clin Risk Manag, 2015, 11(3): 161-170.
[2] Carrier CS, Bono CM, Lebl DR. Evidence-based analysis of adjacent segment degeneration and disease after ACDF: a systematic review[J]. Spine, 2013, 13(10): 1370-1378.
[3] 唐彦超, 于淼, 刘晓光, 等. 脊髓型颈椎病伴发育性椎管狭窄患者的脊髓储备空间[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2014, 24(8): 738-741.
[4] Chen H, Zhong J, Tan J, et al. Sagittal geometry of the middle andlower cervical endplates[J]. Eur Spine J, 2013, 22(7): 1570-1575.
[5] 孙文志, 鲁世保, 海涌, 等. 成人下腰椎终板矢状面形态的CT测量[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2015, 35(12): 1222-1227.
[6] 娄纪刚, 刘浩, 戎鑫, 等. 颈椎下终板冠状面形态分型[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2016, 24(7): 648-652.
[7] Seo JW, Park JW , Jang JC, et al. Anterior cervical osteophytes causing dysphagia and paradoxical vocal cord motion leading to dyspnea and dysphonia[J]. Ann Rehabil Med, 2013, 37(5): 717-720.
[8] 王云剑. 脊柱退行性病[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2002: 417-455.
[9] 缪锦浩, 匡勇, 陈德玉, 等. 颈前路减压零切迹椎间植骨融合内固定系统治疗颈椎病的早期疗效分析[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2012, 22(6): 536-540.
[10]Chen Y, Yang L, Liu Y, et al. Surgical results and prognostic factors of anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament[J]. PloS one, 2014, 9(7): e102008
[11]袁峰, 杨慧林, 张志明, 等. 颈椎不同撑开高度时椎间隙的变化及其临床意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2004, 22(6): 583-585.
[12]许进, 唐成林. 74例显微镜下前路间盘摘除Cage植骨融合钛板内固定术治疗脊髓型颈椎病疗效观察[J]. 颈腰痛杂志, 2018, 39(1): 27-30.
[13]熊传芝, 鹿均先, 唐天驷, 等. 经内镜颈前微创入路颈椎手术的解剖学研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2005, 22(3): 252-254.
[14]陈光福, 赵晓东, 王敏, 等. 颈前路经椎间盘显微手术减压治疗神经根型颈椎病[J]. 中华显微外科杂志, 2018, 41(6): 593-595.
[15]Lee SH, Lee JH, Choi WC, et al. Anterior minimally invasive approaches for the cervical spine[J]. Orthop Clin North Am, 2007, 38(3): 327-337.