中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2013, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 127-131.

• 应用解剖 • 上一篇    下一篇

经口咽下颌骨劈开扩大入路的应用解剖及临床应用

何玥1, 尹庆水2, 夏虹2, 艾福志2, 王智运2   

  1. 1.南方医科大学研究生学院,  广州   510515; 2.广州军区广州总医院骨科医院,  广州   510010
  • 收稿日期:2012-11-12 出版日期:2013-03-25 发布日期:2013-04-08
  • 通讯作者: 尹庆水,教授,博士生导师,E-mail:yqi@medmail.com.cn E-mail:raul86@126.com
  • 作者简介:何玥(1986-),男,天津人,在读硕士,研究方向:上颈椎战创伤治疗, Tel:(020)36653535
  • 基金资助:

    全军医学科学技术研究“十二五”计划项目(BWS11C065)

The applied anatomy and clinical application of the transoral approach with mandibulotomy and mandibuloglossotomy

HE Yue1, YIN Qing-shui2, XIA Hong2, AI Fu-zhi2,WANG Zhi-yun2   

  1. 1.Graduated Institute, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515,China; 2.Department of Orthopedics, Guangzhou General Military Hospital of Guangzhou Command of PLA,Guangzhou 510010,China
  • Received:2012-11-12 Online:2013-03-25 Published:2013-04-08

摘要:

目的 为经口咽下颌骨劈开扩大入路提供解剖学依据。  方法 6例新鲜成人头颈部标本,以模拟手术方式,依次行经口下颌骨劈开(保留舌体)和经口下颌骨、舌体劈开扩大入路解剖至颈髓,依次测量并记录两种入路的显露范围,探查性操作范围及重建性操作范围,测量双侧椎动脉相关解剖数据。  结果 两种扩大入路的显露角度分别为(63.67±3.50)°和(74.14±1.47)°。最大探查性操作范围分别为斜坡下1/3→C5上终板和斜坡下1/3→C6上终板,最大重建性操作范围分别为C2下1/2→C5上终板和C2下1/2→C6上终板。椎动脉距中线C2/3为(16.88±0.75)mm;C3/4为(16.48±1.47)mm,C4/5为(16.30±1.09)mm;距门齿垂直深度C2/3为(96.44±3.59)mm;C3/4为(97.94±4.51)mm,C4/5为(99.83±4.77)mm。  结论 经口咽下颌骨劈开扩大入路是处理张口受限和颈脊髓腹侧长节段病变的安全、有效的入路,需据手术范围确定是否劈开舌体。

关键词: 手术入路, 经口咽入路, 上颈椎, 下颌骨, 应用解剖

Abstract:

Objective This study was designed to investigate the anatomic foundation for the transoral approach with mandibulutomy and mandibuloglossotomy. Methods Transoral approach with mandubulutomy and mandibuloglossotomy were simulated in 6 fresh cadavers to cervical spinal cord; the cephalic and caudal limits of exposure  and the distances between the vertebral artery(VA) of each side to the midline and the vertical depth between the VA of each side to the fore-teeth of the two approaches were measured. Furthermore, the exploratory operational range and reconstructive operational range were described. Results The exposure angle of mandibulotomy and mandibuloglossotomy were 63.67°±3.50°and 74.14°±1.47°, respectively.The widest EOR of mandibulotomy and mandibuloglossotomy were the lower third of the clivus to the upper edge of C5 and the lower third of the clivus to the upper edge of C6, respectively.The widest ROR of mandibulotomy and mandibuloglossotomy were the lower half of axis to the upper edge of C5 and the lower half of axis to the upper edge of C6, respectively. The distance between the vertebral artery(VA) of each side to the midline is  (16.88±0.75)mm at C2/3, (16.48±1.47)mm at C3/4 and (16.30±1.09)mm at C4/5, respectively. Furthermore, the vertical depth between the VA of each side to the fore-teeth of the two approaches was (96.44±3.59)mm at C2/3,(97.94±4.51)mm at C3/4 and (99.83±4.77)mm at C4/5, respectively. Conclusions The transoral approach with mandibulotomy and mandibuloglossotomy is safe and effective in dealing with patients with limitation of mouth opening and long segmental ventral decompression of the cervical spine; However,whether glossotomy is performed or not depends on the particular range of the surgery.

Key words: Surgical approach, Transoral approach, Upper cervical spine, Mandibular, Applied anatomy

中图分类号: