股骨头钻孔减压孔径对股骨颈生物力学影响的实验研究
Effects of different tunnel sizes of femoral head core decompression on femoral neck biomechanics
目的 观察经转子间股骨头减压钻孔的孔径对股骨颈生物力学的影响。 方法 取新鲜尸体股骨标本24具, 随机分成4组：正常组、单孔减压组(D=10 mm)、双孔减压组(D=7 mm)和3孔减压组 (D=7 mm)。在股骨颈主张力侧、主压力侧和小转子处各选择1点作为应变测试点，检测4组标本在,0～1200 N分级载荷下各测点的应变。 结果 在股骨颈主张力侧和主压力侧的测试点中，单孔减压组、双孔减压组和3孔减压组的应变值均大于正常组，其中双孔减压组的应变值在三组钻孔组间最小，并且与其它组间相比差异具有显著性（P<0.05）。 结论 经转子间股骨头钻孔减压明显影响股骨颈生物力学性能，与单纯大孔钻孔面积相同的2小孔钻孔减压对股骨颈生物力学性能影响较小。
Objective To observe the effects of different tunnel sizes of the femoral head core decompression on femoral neck biomechanics. Methods 24 fresh cadaver femur specimens were randomly divided into four groups: a normal group, a single-tunnel core decompression group (D=10 mm), a 2-tunnel core decompression group (D=7mm) and a 3- tunnel core decompression group (D=7mm). 3 points in main tension side, main pressure side and the lesser trochanter were chosen as the test points of strain from 0N to 1200N load. Results The strain of the 2-tunnel group was the lowest among the normal group, the single-tunnel group, 2-tunnel group and 3-tunnel group; furthermore, the strain values of all of the 3 core decompression groups were larger than that in the normal group in tension side and the pressure side. Conclusions There is a significant effect on the femoral neck biomechanics by femoral head core decompression. The 2-tunnel (D= 7mm) with the lowest strain value may be the best choice to femoral head core decompression.
[1] 王锐英，孙超 傅德皓.经转子大孔径髓芯减压术对人股骨颈力学强度的影响
[J].山东医药，2009,49(14):1-2.
[2] Heetveld MJ, Raaymakers EL, vall Eek. et a1. Internal fixation for displaced fmetares of the femoral neck．Does bone density affect clinical outcome?
[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005,87(3):367·373.
[3] 赵以甦.骨科的生物力学基本名词定义(下)
[J]. 中华骨科杂志,2006,26(5):358-360.
[4] 许硕贵，张春才.骨科生物力学测试技术及其意义
[J]. 生物医学工程与临床,2002,6(4):232-235.
[5] 赵卫东,李鉴轶,张美超.现实与虚拟互动的骨科生物力学研究方法探讨
[J].中国临床解剖学杂志,2003,21(3):297-298.
[6] Tsubota K, Suzuki Y, Yamada T, et al. Computer simulation of trabeeular remodeling in human proximal femur using largescale voxel FE models: Approach to understanding Wolff’s law
[J].J Biomech2009,42(8): 1088-1094.
[7] Oruou ES, Marshall LM, Nielson CM. Finite element analysis of the promi-Mal femur and hip frcture risk in older men
[J]. J Bone Miner Res,2009, 24(3):475-483.
[8] 鞠杨，陈永兰，孙华飞. 股骨形态及应力应变的三维有限元分析
[J].力学与实践，2007,29（3）：61-63.
[9] Ganapathi M, Evans S, Roberts P. Strain pattern following sur-face replacement of the hip
[J]. Proc Inst Mech Eng, 2008, 222(1):13-18.
[10] Wang RY, Gao Y, Yang SH.et al. Titanium alloy cage implantation for the treatment of ischemic necrosis of femoral head in dogs
[J]. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technol Med Sci, 2008, 28 (2) :163-166.
[11] 方浩, 朱建民,曾明.动力加压髋螺钉取出后钉道内植骨的生物力学意义
[J].临床骨科杂志, 2001,4(3):165-168.
[12]季卫锋，丁伟航，马镇川. 三通道髓芯钻孔减压加DBM、自体骨髓干细胞治疗早期股骨头坏死
[J].中国骨伤，2008,21(10)：776-778.
宁波市医学科技计划项目（2010B04）
京ICP备08002354号-3/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
