胸腰椎二柱和三柱损伤短节段固定的稳定性比较

杨勇, 邹琳, 江建明, 赵卫东, 瞿东滨

中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2012, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2) : 225-228.

中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2012, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2) : 225-228.
临床生物力学

胸腰椎二柱和三柱损伤短节段固定的稳定性比较

  • 杨 勇1, 邹 琳1, 江建明1, 赵卫东2, 瞿东滨1
作者信息 +

Biomechanic comparison of 2-column and 3-column thoracolumbar injury after short segmental fixation

  • YANG Yong1, ZOU Lin1,  ZHAO Wei-Dong2, JIANG Jian-Ming1, QU Dong-Bin1
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 通过生物力学研究方法比较短节段固定对胸腰椎二柱(前中柱)损伤和三柱损伤的固定稳定性。  方法 选取8具新鲜家猪T13~L5节段的脊柱标本。实验标本需进行4种状态下的测试:正常状态(A);二柱损伤状态(B);二柱损伤短节段固定状态(C);三柱损伤短节段固定状态(D)。标本先采用自由落锤方法制成L2椎体的二柱(前中柱)损伤不稳模型;再在二柱损伤基础上破坏棘间,棘上韧带,黄韧带和小关节制备成严重不稳的三柱损伤模型固定。测试每种状态下的L1~3的活动度(ROM)和压缩刚度(Compressive Stiffness)并进行统计分析。  结果 在后伸,侧屈及旋转方向上三柱损伤组的ROM值均显著高于二柱损伤固定组(P<0.05)。两柱损伤组在屈伸,侧屈,旋转方向的ROM均大于正常组(P<0.05)。两柱损伤固定组与两柱损伤组相比在各方向上ROM显著减少(P<0.05)。三柱损伤固定组和正常组相比前屈ROM(P=0.002)、侧屈ROM(P=0.001)显著增高。三柱损伤固定组压缩刚度显著低于两柱损伤固定组 (P<0.05)。三柱损伤固定组压缩刚度显著低于正常组(P<0.05)。  结论 胸腰椎两柱损伤采用短节段固定能获得足够的稳定性,而三柱损伤采用短节段固定术后即刻稳定性和垂直抗压强度均明显较差。

Abstract

Objective To compare biomechanical stability of 2-column and 3-column thoracolumbar injury after short segmental fixation.   Methods   Eight fresh frozen porcine thoracolumbar spine specimens (T13-L5) were collected, and divided to four groups: intact group (A), injury group(B), 2-column injury fixation group(C), and 3-column injury fixation group(D). The stability of four groups at flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation were measured respectively. Two-column injury model was created using dropping technique. For three-column injury model, The excision of supra-spinous ligament, inter-spinous ligament, ligamenta flava and zygapophysial joint was performed on the basis of two-column injury.    Results   The ROMs of group D at extension, lateral bending and rotation directions were signifcantly increased compared to that of group C (P<0.05), as well ROM of group D at axial rotation increased signifcantly compared to that of group A (P<0.05). The ROMs of group B at all directions increased significantly compared to group A (P<0.05), and ROM of group C decreased significantly compared to group B (P<0.05). The compression stiffness of group D decreased significantly compared to group C (P<0.05), and that of group C decreased significantly compared to group B (P<0.05). The compression stiffness of group D had no difference compared to group B (P>0.05).    Conclusions    Compare to the three-column injury, the short-segment fixation is more suitable for keeping mechanic stability of the 2-column injury of thoracolumbar level.

关键词

胸腰椎 / 损伤 / 生物力学 / 稳定性

Key words

Two-column injury / Three-column injury / Biomechanics / Stability / Compressive Stiffness

引用本文

导出引用
杨勇, 邹琳, 江建明, 赵卫东, 瞿东滨. 胸腰椎二柱和三柱损伤短节段固定的稳定性比较[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志. 2012, 30(2): 225-228
YANG Yong, JU Lin, JIANG Jian-Meng, DIAO Wei-Dong, JI Dong-Bin. Biomechanic comparison of 2-column and 3-column thoracolumbar injury after short segmental fixation[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy. 2012, 30(2): 225-228
中图分类号:      R318.01   

参考文献


[1]  Denis F.The three column spine and its significance in the classification of acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries
[J].Spine,1983, 8(8):817-831.

[2]  Kallemeier PM, Beaubien BP, Buttermann GR, et al. In vitro analysis of anterior and posterior fixation in an experimental unstable burst fracture model
[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech,2008, 21(3):216-224.

[3]  Wang XY, Dai LY, Xu HZ, et al. The load-sharing classi?cation of thoracolumbar fractures: an in vitro biomechanical validation
[J]. Spine,2007,32(11):1214–1219.

[4]   王向阳,池永龙,徐华梓,等. 脊柱前中柱稳定性对椎弓根螺钉内固定器前屈压缩刚度的影响及其意义
[J].骨与关节损伤杂志,2003,18(9):614-616.

[5]  Lazaro BC, Deniz FE, Brasiliense LB, et al. Biomechanics of thoracic short versus long fixation after 3-column injury:Laboratory investigation
[J].J Neurosurg Spine,2011,14(2):226–234.

[6]  朱旻宇,黄其杉,池永龙,等.对带横连杆的椎弓根钉固定胸腰段脊柱骨折(T11~L3)的稳定性评价
[J].医用生物力学,2010,25(2):100-104.

[7]  Anekstein Y, Brosh T, Mirovsky Y.Intermediate screws in short segment pedicular fixation for thoracic and lumbar fractures:a biomechanical study
[J].J Spinal Disord Tech, 2007,20(1):72-77

[8]  Yu SW, Fan KF, Tseng IC, et.al. Surgical outcomes of short-segment fixation for thoracolumbar fracture dislocation
[J].Chang Gung Med J ,2002,25:253-259

[9]   袁    强,田    伟,张贵林,等.骨折椎垂直应力螺钉在胸腰椎骨折中的应用
[J].中华骨科杂志,2006,26(4):217-222

[10]Mahar A, Kim C,Wedemeyer M, et al. Short-segment fixation of lumbar burst fractures using pedicle fixation at the level of the fracture
[J]. Spine, 2007,32(14):1503–1507.

[11]Farrokhi MR, Razmkon A, Maghami Z, et al. Inclusion of the fracture level in short segment ?xation of thoracolumbar fractures
[J]. Eur Spine J ,2010, 19(10):1651–1656.

[12]Kaigle AM, Holm SH, Hansson TH.Volvo award winner in biomechanical studies. Kinematic behavior of the porcine lumbar spine:a chronic lesion model
[J].Spine, 1997,22(24):2796-2806.

[13]Pfeiffer M, Griss P, Franke P, et al.Degeneration model of the porcine lumbar motion segment: effects of various intradiscal procedures
[J]. Eur Spine J, 1994,3(1):8-16.


Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/