列线图构建面肌痉挛患者显微血管减压术后延迟治愈的风险模型

杨春春, 潘迪迪, 侯雪雷, 张旺

中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6) : 717-723.

PDF(2616 KB)
PDF(2616 KB)
中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6) : 717-723. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2025.6.15
临床研究

列线图构建面肌痉挛患者显微血管减压术后延迟治愈的风险模型

  • 杨春春,    潘迪迪,    侯雪雷,    张旺
作者信息 +

Construction of a risk model for delayed healing in patients with hemifacial spasm after microvascular decompression surgery  using a nomogram

  • Yang Chunchun, Pan Didi, Hou Xuelei, Zhang Wang
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的    分析面肌痉挛患者显微血管减压术(MVD)后延迟治愈的影响因素,构建并验证列线图风险模型。  方法    选择2022年8月至2024年11月我院收治的108例面肌痉挛患者,所有患者均接受MVD术治疗。术后随访6个月,根据面肌痉挛患者MVD术后是否发生延迟治愈分为观察组与对照组。分析面肌痉挛患者MVD术后发生延迟治愈的影响因素,构建并验证列线图风险模型。  结果    随访后,所有患者均未失访。复发1例、无效1例、部分缓解2例、明显缓解3例、延迟治愈21例、即刻治愈80例。观察组的病史长于对照组(P<0.05),观察组的术中血管压迫程度为重度、术前面肌痉挛严重程度为Ⅳ级、异常面肌反应(AMR)监测为未消失例数占比高于对照组(P<0.05),观察组的面神经根部有压迹例数占比低于对照组(P<0.05)。病史、术中血管压迫程度为重度、术前面肌痉挛严重程度为Ⅳ级、AMR监测为未消失为面肌痉挛患者MVD术后发生延迟治愈的独立危险因素(P<0.05),面神经根部有压迹为面肌痉挛患者MVD术后发生延迟治愈的保护因素(P<0.05)。列线图模型预测面肌痉挛患者MVD术后发生延迟治愈的灵敏度为90.48%,特异度为83.75%,AUC为0.929。  结论    病史长、术中血管压迫程度为重度、术前面肌痉挛严重程度为Ⅳ级、AMR监测为未消失、面神经根部有压迹与面肌痉挛患者MVD术后发生延迟治愈有关,构建列线图风险模型有助于早期识别MVD术后延迟治愈发生风险。

Abstract

Objective  To analyze the influencing factors of delayed cure after microvascular decompression (MVD) in patients with hemifacial spasm and to construct and validate a nomogram risk model.    Methods    A total of 108 patients with hemifacial spasm admitted to our hospital from August 2022 to November 2024 were selected. All patients underwent MVD. They were followed up for 6 months after surgery and divided into the observation group and the control group based on whether delayed cure occurred after MVD. The influencing factors of delayed cure after MVD in patients with hemifacial spasm were analyzed, and a nomogram risk model was constructed and validated.    Results    After follow-up, no patients were lost to follow-up. There was 1 recurrence, 1 ineffective case, 2 partial remissions, 3 significant remissions, 21 delayed cures, and 80 immediate cures. The observation group had a longer medical history than the control group (P<0.05). The proportion of severe vascular compression during surgery, grade IV hemifacial spasm severity before surgery, and  undiminished abnormal muscle response (AMR) monitoring in the observation group was higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). The proportion of patients with nerve root indentation in the observation group was lower than in the control group (P<0.05). Long medical history, severe vascular compression during surgery, grade IV hemifacial spasm severity before surgery, and undiminished AMR monitoring were independent risk factors for delayed cure after MVD in patients with hemifacial spasm (P<0.05). Nerve root indentation was a protective factor for delayed cure after MVD in patients with hemifacial spasm (P<0.05). The nomogram model predicted delayed cure after MVD in patients with hemifacial spasm with a sensitivity of 90.48%, a specificity of 83.75%, and an AUC of 0.929.  Conclusions   Long medical history, severe vascular compression during surgery, grade IV hemifacial spasm severity before surgery, undiminished  AMR monitoring, and nerve root indentation are related to delayed cure after MVD in patients with hemifacial spasm. Constructing a nomogram risk model is helpful for early identification of the risk of delayed cure after MVD.

关键词

面肌痉挛;  /   / 显微血管减压术;  /   / 延迟治愈;  /   / 影响因素;  /   / 预测模型

Key words

Hemifacial spasm;  /   / Microvascular decompression;  /   / Delayed cure;  /   / Influencing factors / Prediction model

引用本文

导出引用
杨春春, 潘迪迪, 侯雪雷, 张旺. 列线图构建面肌痉挛患者显微血管减压术后延迟治愈的风险模型[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志. 2025, 43(6): 717-723 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2025.6.15
Yang Chunchun, Pan Didi, Hou Xuelei, Zhang Wang. Construction of a risk model for delayed healing in patients with hemifacial spasm after microvascular decompression surgery  using a nomogram[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy. 2025, 43(6): 717-723 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2025.6.15
中图分类号: R651.1    

参考文献

[1] Marin GM, Gutierrez AA. Eslicarbazepine acetate as therapy in hemifacial spasm[J].Neurologia (Engl Ed), 2022,37(3):229-231. DOI:10.1016/j.nrl.2021.05.004.
[2]  Ujihara M, Kobayashi M, Sato M, et al. Impact of flocculus medial extension on the root exit zone visibility during microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm[J].Neurosurg Rev, 2025, 48(1):578. DOI:10.1007/s10143-025-03734-4. 
[3] Kondo A, Shimano H, Yasuda S, et al. A proposal for standardized analysis of microvascular decompression results in hemifacial spasm[J].World Neurosurg, 2025, 124311. DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124311.
[4] Lai R, Zhao Y, Xue J, et al. A retrospective study of the effect of papaverine on perioperative efficacy of microvascular decompression in the treatment of hemifacial spasm[J].Clin Neurol Neurosurg,2025, 256109028. DOI:10.1016/j.clineuro.2025.109028. 
[5] Cheng D, Liu C, Qiu Y, et al. Monitoring of the lateral spread response combined with brainstem auditory evoked potentials in microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm[J].Front Neurol, 2025,161516606-1516606. DOI:10.3389/fneur.2025.1516606.
[6] Joo BE, Kim JS, Deletis V, et al. Advances in intraoperative neurophysiology during microvascular decompression surgery for hemifacial spasm[J]. J Clin Neurol, 2022, 18(4): 410-420. DOI:10.3988/jcn.2022.18.4.410. 
[7]  Menna G, Battistelli M, Rapisarda A, et al. Factors related to hemifacial spasm recurrence in patients undergoing  microvascular decompression-a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Brain Sci, 2022, 12(5):583.DOI:10.3390/brainsci12050583. 
[8]  何颖, 李玉琢, 陈静, 等. 基于瞬目反射检测的面肌痉挛患者面神经核团兴奋性机制研究[J].中华神经医学杂志, 2023, 22(12): 1229-1235. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.cn115354-20230909-00112.
      He Y, Li YZ, Chen J, et al. Research on the Excitatory Mechanism of Facial Nerve Nucleus in Patients with Facial Spasm Based on Blink Reflex Detection [J]. Chinese Journal of Neurology, 2023, 22(12): 1229-1235. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115354-20230909-00112
[9]  上海交通大学颅神经疾病诊治中心.面肌痉挛诊疗中国专家共识[J]. 中国微侵袭神经外科杂志,2014,19(11): 528-532. DOI:10.11850/j.issn.1009-122X.2014.11.018.
      Shanghai Jiao Tong University Brain Nerve Disease Diagnosis and Treatment Center. Chinese Expert Consensus on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Facial Spasm [J]. Chinese Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery Journal, 2014(11): 528-532. DOI: 10.11850/j.issn.1009-122X.2014.11.018.
[10]Park KS, Lee SH, Cho RK, et al. Recent Advances in Intraoperative Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potential Monitoring during Microvascular Decompression Surgery for Hemifacial Spasm[J]. Life,2023,13(9):1789. DOI:10.3390/life13091789. 
[11]Jesuthasan A, Natalwala A, Davagnanam I, et al. Hemifacial spasm: an update on pathophysiology, investigations and management[J]. J Neurol, 2025, 272(8): 502.  DOI:10.1007/s00415-025-13220-y. 
[12]李保华, 周忠海, 孟凡刚, 等.面肌痉挛微血管减压术前基于3D Slicer三维重建技术的可视化研究[J].中国现代神经疾病杂志, 2024, 24(10): 834-839. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-6731.2024.10.010.
       Li BH, Zhou ZH, Meng FG, et al. Visualization Study on Preoperative Microvascular Decompression for Hemifacial Spasm Based on 3D Slicer 3D Reconstruction Technology [J]. Chinese Journal of Modern Neurology, 2024, 24(10): 834-839. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-6731. 2024. 10.010.
[13]Tengattini F, Calbucci F, Borghesi I, et al. How I do it: combined interposition-transposition technique for microvascular decompression in primary hemifacial spasm[J].Acta Neurochir,2025,167(1): 80. DOI:10.1007/s00701-025-06472-0. 
[14]Matsunaga K, Ichimasu N, Nakajima N, et al. Comparison of Surgical Outcomes in Microscopic and Fully Endoscopic Microvascular Decompression for Hemifacial Spasm[J]. Neurol MedChir, 2025, 65(5):230-238. DOI:10.2176/jns-nmc.2024-0245. 
[15]Shen L, Xiong N. Letter: Evaluation of 2 Surgical Techniques-Transposition Versus Interposition Microvascular Decompression for Hemifacial Spasm: A Systematic Review of19437 Patients[J].Neurosurgery,2025,97(1): e27-e28. DOI:10.1227/neu.000000000000 3496. 
[16]Park JS, Park K. Operative Findings of over 5000 microvascular decompression surgeries for hemifacial spasm: our perspective and current updates[J]. Life (Basel), 2023,13(9):1904.DOI:10.3390/life13091904.
[17]Yosuke S, Katsuyoshi S, Kazuki I, et al. Factors Related to the Delayed Cure of Hemifacial Spasm after Microvascular Decompression: An Analysis of 175 Consecutive Patients[J]. J Neurol Surg B, Skull Base, 2022, 83(5): 548-553. DOI:10.1055/s-0041-1740970.
[18]Wang H, Shi H, Zhang K, et al. Clinical analysis of abnormal muscle response monitoring for hemifacial spasm during microvascular decompression: a retrospective study[J].Acta Neurol Belg. 2025, 125(2): 531-541. DOI:10.1007/s13760-024-02650-6.
[19]王柏嵊.面肌痉挛患者显微血管减压术后延迟治愈与术前服用抗惊厥类药物疗效的相关性研究[D]. 北京协和医学院, 2022.
     Wang BS. Correlation Study on Delayed Cure after Microvascular Decompression for Hemifacial Spasm Patients and the Efficacy of Antiepileptic Drugs Taken Before Surgery [D]. Peking Union Medical College, 2022.
[20]Amano Y, Asayama B, Noro S, et al. Correlation between delayed relief after microvascular decompression and  morphology of the lateral spread response in patients withhemifacial  spasm-further examination with compound motor action potentials[J]. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo), 2024, 64(10): 360-368. DOI:10.2176/jns-nmc.2024-0017. 
[21]Liu X, Li X, Hou Z, et al. Risk factors for Delayed Facial Palsy following Microvascular Decompression in Hemifacial Spasm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.[J].World Neurosurg,2025,200124144. DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124144. 
[22]车阳明.面肌痉挛微血管减压术后延迟治愈的相关因素分析[D]. 新疆: 新疆医科大学, 2023.
     Che YM. Analysis of Related Factors for Delayed Cure after Microvascular Decompression Surgery for Facial Spasm [D]. Xinjiang: Xinjiang Medical University, 2023.
[23]Amano Y, Asayama B, Noro S, et al. Significant correlation between delayed relief after microvascular decompression and morphology of the abnormal muscle response in patients with hemifacial spasm[J]. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo), 2022, 62(11):513-520.DOI:10.2176/jns-nmc. 2022-0145. 
[24]Rhomberg T, Eördögh M, Lehmann S, et al. Endoscope-assisted microvascular decompression in hemifacial spasm with a teflon bridge[J].Acta Neurochira,2024,166(1):239-239.DOI:10.1007/s00701-024-06142-7. 
[25]Wanchun Z, Zhenxing L, Hua Z, et al. Optimized microvascular decompression surgery for improving the results of hemifacial spasm: an analysis of reoperations[J].Neurosurg Rev, 2024,47(1):685. DOI:10.1007/s10143-024-02892-1. 
[26]Chen K, Shen L, Yang J, et al. A nomogram based on clinical multivariate factors predicts delayed cure after microvascular decompression for hemifacial spasm[J]. Neurosurg Rev, 2024,47(1):44.DOI:10.1007/s10143-024-02284-5. 
[27]陈利薇, 张军, 蒙象强, 等.基于评估学信息的意识障碍患者6个月结局预测列线图模型的建立[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2024, 39(5): 655-662. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2024.05.007.
      Chen LW, Zhang J, Meng XQ, et al. Establishment of a nomogram model for predicting the 6-month outcome of patients with cognitive impairment based on assessment information [J]. Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 2024, 39(5):655-662. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn. 1001-1242.2024.05.007.
[28]伍发, 杨钰林, 伍婷婷, 等.原发性脑出血早期血肿扩大的影响因素及列线图预测模型[J].解放军医学杂志, 2024,49(5): 504-510. DOI:10.11855/j.issn.0577-7402.0855.2023.1206.
      Wu F, Yang YL, Wu TT, et al. Influencing Factors of Early Hematoma Expansion in Primary Cerebral Hemorrhage and Prediction Model Based on Nomogram [J]. Journal of PLA Medical Sciences, 2024, 49(5):  504-510.  DOI: 10.11855/j.issn.0577-7402.0855.2023.1206.

基金

安徽省科技厅临床医学研究转化项目(202204295107020053)

PDF(2616 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/