退行性腰椎侧凸椎管形态学特征及其与脊柱-骨盆参数的相关性分析

吴嘉宝, 孙伯林, 邢锴, 张宁, 周荣平, 陈江伟, 刘志礼, 刘家明

中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2) : 159-167.

PDF(4603 KB)
PDF(4603 KB)
中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2) : 159-167. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2024.2.08
应用解剖

退行性腰椎侧凸椎管形态学特征及其与脊柱-骨盆参数的相关性分析

  • 吴嘉宝1,2,    孙伯林1,2,    邢锴1,2,    张宁3,    周荣平1,2,    陈江伟1,2,    刘志礼1,2,    刘家明1,2*
作者信息 +

Anatomical features of the spinal canal in degenerative lumbar scoliosis and its correlation with spinal-pelvic parameters

  • Wu Jiabao1,2, Sun Bolin1,2, Xing Kai1,2, Zhang Ning3, Zhou Rongping1,2, Chen Jiangwei1,2, Liu Zhili1,2, Liu Jiaming1,2*
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的    测量退行性腰椎侧凸(degenerative lumbar scoliosis,DLS)患者椎管形态学参数,分析其变化规律及其与脊柱-骨盆参数的相关性。  方法    收集DLS患者50例,分别在X线、CT及MRI上测量腰弯Cobb角、腰椎前凸角、顶椎位置、顶椎偏移距离、顶椎旋转度、顶椎侧方和前方滑移距离、骨盆投射角(pelvic incidence,PI)、骨盆倾斜角(pelvic tilt,PT)、骶骨倾斜角(sacral slope,SS)、凹侧和凸侧椎间孔高度、宽度和横截面积、硬膜囊横截面积、横径和前后径,分析椎管形态学变化规律及其与脊柱-骨盆参数的相关性。  结果    DLS患者的顶椎位于L2~L3椎体;其椎管相关参数最小处均位于L4/5节段;椎间孔相关参数最小处均位于L2/3节段。DLS患者L2/3水平椎管及椎间孔的形态学参数与年龄、腰弯Cobb角及顶椎偏移距离存在相关性(P<0.05);而L5/S1水平椎间孔的形态学参数与PI、SS存在相关性(P<0.05)。  结论    DLS患者椎管最狭窄处多位于L4/5节段,而椎间孔最狭窄处多位于L2/3节段。顶椎区椎管狭窄程度、椎间孔狭窄程度与脊柱-骨盆参数之间存在一定的相关性。

Abstract

Objective    To analyze the change pattern and its correlation with spinal-pelvic parameters by measuring morphological parameters of the spinal canal in patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS).    Methods    Fifty cases of DLS patients were collected. Cobb angle of lumbar bending, anterior lumbar convexity angle, position of the parietal vertebra, distance of parietal offset, rotation of the parietal vertebra, distance of lateral and anterior slip of the parietal vertebra, pelvic parameters PI, PT, SS, height, width and cross-sectional area of the intervertebral foramen on the concave and convex sides, cross-sectional area of the dural sac, transverse diameter and anterior-posterior diameter were measured on X-ray, CT and MRI, respectively. The patterns of morphological changes in the spinal canal and their correlation with spinal-pelvic parameters were analyzed.    Results   The parietal vertebra of DLS patients were located in the L2~L3 vertebra. The lowest spinal canal parameters were located at L4/5 level, the lowest intervertebral foramen parameters were located at L2/3 level. Morphological parameters of the spinal canal and intervertebral foramen at the L2/3 level correlated with age, cobb angle of lumbar bending, and distance of parietal offset in patients with DLS (P<0.05); while morphological parameters of the intervertebral foramen at the L5/S1 level were correlated with PI and SS (P<0.05).    Conclusions    The most narrowed spinal canal in DLS patients is mostly located at the L4/5 segment, while the most narrowed intervertebral foramen is mostly located at the L2/3 segment. There is a correlation between the degree of spinal canal stenosis and foraminal stenosis in the parietal region and spinal-pelvic parameters.

关键词

退行性腰椎侧凸;  /   / 椎管;  /   / 椎间孔;  /   / 解剖学;  /   / 测量

Key words

Degenerative lumbar scoliosis;  /  Spinal canal;  /  Intervertebral foramen;  /  Anatomy / Measurement

引用本文

导出引用
吴嘉宝, 孙伯林, 邢锴, 张宁, 周荣平, 陈江伟, 刘志礼, 刘家明. 退行性腰椎侧凸椎管形态学特征及其与脊柱-骨盆参数的相关性分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志. 2024, 42(2): 159-167 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2024.2.08
Wu Jiabao, Sun Bolin, Xing Kai, Zhang Ning, Zhou Rongping, Chen Jiangwei, Liu Zhili, Liu Jiaming. Anatomical features of the spinal canal in degenerative lumbar scoliosis and its correlation with spinal-pelvic parameters[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy. 2024, 42(2): 159-167 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2024.2.08
中图分类号: R323.33    

参考文献

[1] Kiram A, Hu Z, Man GC, et al. The role of paraspinal muscle degeneration in coronal imbalance in patients with degenerative scoliosis[J]. Quant Imaging Med Surg, 2022, 12(11): 5101-5113. DOI: 10.21037/qims-22-222.
 [2] Ding JZ, Kong C, Sun XY, et al. Perioperative complications and risk factors in degenerative lumbar scoliosis surgery for patients older than 70 years of age[J]. Clin Interv Aging, 2019, 14: 2195-2203. DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S218204.
 [3] Kobayashi T, Atsuta Y, Takemitsu M, et al. A prospective study of de novo scoliosis in a community based cohort[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2006, 31(2): 178-182. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000194777.87055.1b.
 [4] Tsubosaka M, Kaneyama S, Yano T, et al. The factors of deterioration in long-term clinical course of lumbar spinal canal stenosis after successful conservative treatment[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2018, 13(1): 239. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-018-0947-2.
 [5] Zhang Z, Liu T, Wang Y, et al. Factors related to preoperative coronal malalignment in degenerative lumbar scoliosis: an analysis on coronal parameters[J]. Orthop Surg, 2022, 14(8): 1846-1852. DOI: 10.1111/os.13379.
 [6] Steurer J, Roner S, Gnannt R, et al. Quantitative radiologic criteria for the diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic literature review[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2011, 12: 175. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-175.
 [7] Lim YS, Mun JU, Seo MS, et al. Dural sac area is a more sensitive parameter for evaluating lumbar spinal stenosis than spinal canal area: a retrospective study[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2017, 96(49): e9087. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009087.
 [8] 马逍悦, 包呼格吉乐图, 蔡志平, 等. 内蒙古包头地区成人第5腰椎平面椎管解剖学与CT测量比较[J]. 包头医学院学报, 2018, 34(11): 84-86. DOI: 10.16833/j.cnki.jbmc.2018.11.038.
 [9] Ding H, Liao L, Yan P, et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of L4-5 degenerative lumbar disc traction under different pushing heights[J]. J Healthc Eng, 2021, 2021: 1322397. DOI: 10.1155/2021/1322397.
[10]Jenis LG, An HS. Spine update. Lumbar foraminal stenosis[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2000, 25(3): 389-394. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200002010-00022.
[11] Quante M, Richter A, Thomsen B, et al. [Surgical management of adult scoliosis. The challenge of osteoporosis and adjacent level degeneration][J]. Orthopade, 2009, 38(2): 159-169. DOI: 10.1007/s00132-008-1391-5.
[12]Hu W, Song Y, Ma H, et al. Correlation analysis of the characteristics of spino-pelvic parameters and health-related quality of life after long-segment fixation for lenke-silva type 5 or 6 degenerative scoliosis[J]. J Pain Res, 2022, 15: 2171-2179. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S368142.
[13]Cho KJ, Kim YT, Shin SH, et al. Surgical treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis[J]. Asian Spine J, 2014, 8(3): 371-381. DOI: 10.4184/asj.2014.8.3.371.
[14] Han F, Weishi L, Zhuoran S, et al. Sagittal plane analysis of the spine and pelvis in degenerative lumbar scoliosis[J]. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong), 2017, 25(1): 612345034. DOI: 10.1177/2309499016684746.
[15]Wang Q, Sun CT. Characteristics and correlation analysis of spino-pelvic sagittal parameters in elderly patients with lumbar degenerative disease[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2019, 14(1): 127. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-019-1156-3.

基金

江西省“双千计划”首批培养类项目;中央引导地方科技发展资金(No.20222ZDH04095);江西省重点研发计划项目(No.20223BBG71S02)

PDF(4603 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/