关节镜联合胫骨高位截骨术对髌骨位置及髌股关节功能影响的早中期回顾性研究

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2024.1.14

PDF(3063 KB)

中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1) : 77-82. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2024.1.14

临床研究

关节镜联合胫骨高位截骨术对髌骨位置及髌股关节功能影响的早中期回顾性研究

庄万强，唐毅，骆勇刚，张辉*

作者信息 +

An early and mid-term retrospective study of the effects of arthroscopy combined with high tibial osteotomy on patellar position and patellofemoral joint function

Zhuang Wanqiang, Tang Yi, Luo Yonggang, Zhang Hui*

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

目的探讨髌骨位置的改变是否会对髌股关节和功能产生不利影响。方法回顾性纳入2018年03月-2021年03月于本研究中心接受关节镜联合胫骨高位截骨术的患者。初次手术和内固定取出过程中进行关节镜诊断，比较各关节软骨状况及临床结果，采取影像学测量，评估髌骨位置变化。探究关节软骨状态与功能的关系。结果共纳入接受关节镜联合胫骨高位截骨术的患者60名，其中男性18例，女性42例，平均年龄（58.6±7.2）岁，平均随访时间（26.8±8.5）月。患者接受手术后，髌骨高度Insall-Salvati Index并无统计学差异，Blackburne-Peel index指数由术前的（0.90±0.11）变为（0.81±0.13）。通过二次关节镜检查，依据国际软骨修复协会软骨损伤评分系统评估，股骨内侧髁的软骨状况从3.81改善至3.35 (P=0.005)，胫骨内侧平台的软骨状况从3.75改善至3.48 （P=0.005）。股骨外侧髁的平均ICRS评分从0.15下降到0.43 (P=0.004)，胫骨外侧髁的平均ICRS评分从0.38下降到0.96 (P<0.001)。髌骨侧平均ICRS分级为2.29~2.31，股骨滑车平均ICRS分级为2.18~2.25。膝关节功能评分较术前明显改善。结论关节镜联合胫骨高位截骨术后，尽管髌骨位置会出现影像学改变，但髌股关节软骨未见明显损伤及退化，膝关节功能尤其髌股关节功能未受到髌骨位置改变影响。

Abstract

Objective To investigate whether the changes in patellar position affect patellofemoral joint function and functional outcomes or not. Methods Patients who underwent arthroscopy combined with high tibial osteotomy (ACHTO) from March 2018 to March 2021 were enrolled in a retrospective study. Arthroscopic diagnosis was performed during primary surgery and internal fixation removal, and the status of articular cartilage and clinical outcomes were compared. Imaging measurements were also taken to evaluate changes in patellar position. At the same time to explore the relationship between articular cartilage status and function. Results A total of 60 patients who received arthroscopy combined with high tibial osteotomy were included in this study, including 18 male patients and 42 female patients, with an average age of (58.6±7.2) years and an average follow-up time of (26.8±8.5) months. After underwent ACHTO surgery, there was no statistical difference in the patellar height index ISI, and the BPI index changed from the preoperative (0.90±0.11) to (0.81±0.13). By secondary arthroscopy, the cartilage condition of the medial femoral condyle improved from 3.81 to 3.35 (P=0.005) and that of the medial tibial plateau from 3.75 to 3.48 (P=0.005) as assessed by the ICRS scoring system. The mean ICRS score of the lateral femoral condyle decreased from 0.15 to 0.43 (P=0.004), and the mean ICRS score of the lateral tibial condyle decreased from 0.38 to 0.96 (P<0.001). The average ICRS grading of the patellar side was 2.29-2.31 and the average ICRS grading of the femoral trochlea was 2.18-2.25. Knee functional scores were significantly improved compared with those before operation. Conclusions After arthroscopy combined with high tibial osteotomy, no obvious damage or degeneration of patellofemoral cartilage is observed. Moreover, the knee function, especially the patellofemoral joint function, was not affected by the change of patellar position.

导出引用

庄万强, 唐毅, 骆勇刚, 张辉. 关节镜联合胫骨高位截骨术对髌骨位置及髌股关节功能影响的早中期回顾性研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志. 2024, 42(1): 77-82 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2024.1.14

Zhuang Wanqiang, Tang Yi, Luo Yonggang, Zhang Hui. An early and mid-term retrospective study of the effects of arthroscopy combined with high tibial osteotomy on patellar position and patellofemoral joint function[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy. 2024, 42(1): 77-82 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2024.1.14

中图分类号： R687.31

参考文献

[1] 李军，梁帅，王健. 模拟手术结合3D打印个性化导航模板在胫骨高位截骨术中的应用[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志， 2023, 41(3):354-359. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2023.3.18.
[2] Hopwood S, Khan W, Agarwal S. The biplanar open wedge high tibial osteotomy preserving the tibial tubercle[J]. J Orthop Sci, 2016, 21(6):786-790. DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2016.07.006.
[3] 刘洋, 梁涛, 张磊, 等. 3D打印辅助胫骨高位开放截骨联合关节镜治疗膝内翻畸形疗效分析[J].中国临床解剖学杂志, 2020, 38(1):67-72. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2020.01.014.
[4] Sabzevari S, Ebrahimpour A, Roudi MK, et al. High tibial osteotomy: a systematic review and current concept[J]. Arch Bone Jt Surg, 2016;4(3):204-212.
[5] Schuster P, Schulz M, Mayer P, et al. Open-wedge high tibial osteotomy and combined abrasion/microfracture in severe medial osteoarthritis and varus malalignment: 5-year results and arthroscopic findings after 2 years[J]. Arthroscopy, 2015, 31(7):1279-1288. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.02.010.
[6] Ahn S, Lee OS, Lee Y. Changes of sagittal and axial alignments of patella after open- and closed-wedge high-tibial osteotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Jo Knee Surg, 2018, 31(7): 625-634. DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1605561.
[7] Fan JC. Open wedge high tibial osteotomy: cause of patellar descent[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2012, 7:3. DOI: 10.1186/1749-799X-7-3.
[8] Tigani D, Ferrari D, Trentani P, et al. Patellar height after high tibial osteotomy[J]. Int Orthop, 2001, 24(6):331-334. DOI: 10.1007/s002640000173.
[9] Javidan P, Adamson GJ, Miller JR, et al. The effect of medial opening wedge proximal tibial osteotomy on patellofemoral contact[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2013, 41(1):80-86. DOI: 10.1177/0363546512462810.
[10] Elson DW, Petheram TG, Dawson MJ. High reliability in digital planning of medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy, using Miniaci's method[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2015, 23(7):2041-2048. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-2920-x.
[11] B Deng FW, L Yin, L Yang, et al. Quantitative study on morphology of calcified cartilage zone in OARSI 0∼4 cartilage from osteoarthritic knees[J]. Curr Res Transl Med, 2016, 64(3):149-154. DOI: 10.1016/j.retram.2016.01.009.
[12]Zhao B, Xiao Q, Liu B. Effects of high tibial osteotomy combined with arthroscopy on pain and inflammation markers in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis[J]. J Invest Surg, 2022, 35(4):891-897. DOI: 10.1080/08941939.2021.1931576.
[13] Horikawa T, Kubota K, Hara S , et al. Distal tuberosity osteotomy in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy does not exacerbate patellofemoral osteoarthritis on arthroscopic evaluation[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2020, 28(6):1750-1756. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05596-y.
[14]Jingbo C, Mingli F, Guanglei C , et al. Patellar height is not altered when the knee axis correction is less than 15 degrees and has good short-term clinical outcome[J]. J Knee Surg, 2020, 33(6):536-546. DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1681051.
[15] Kloos F, Becher C, Fleischer B, et al. High tibial osteotomy increases patellofemoral pressure if adverted proximal, while open-wedge HTO with distal biplanar osteotomy discharges the patellofemoral joint: different open-wedge high tibial osteotomies compared to an extra-articular unloading device[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2019, 27(7):2334-2344. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-018-5194-x.
[16]Jang KM, Lee JH, Park HJ, et al. Unintended rotational changes of the distal tibia after biplane medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2016, 31(1):59-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.08.010.
[17]Matthias J, Vincent V, Robert AM, et al. Factors influencing posterior tibial slope and tibial rotation in opening wedge high tibial osteotomy[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2015, 23(9):2762-68. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3100-8.
[18]Jung WH, Takeuchi R, Chun CW, et al. Second-look arthroscopic assessment of cartilage regeneration after medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy[J]. Arthroscopy, 2014, 30(1):72-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.10.008.