胸椎旁神经阻滞术穿刺深度的解剖学研究

陈韦东, 钱蕾, 瞿东滨, 贺善礼, 李泽宇, 谭炜浩, 钟锦涛, 杨航, 欧阳钧, 郑明辉

中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (5) : 545-548.

中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (5) : 545-548. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2020.05.010
应用解剖

胸椎旁神经阻滞术穿刺深度的解剖学研究

  • 陈韦东1, 钱蕾2, 瞿东滨1, 贺善礼2, 李泽宇2, 谭炜浩3
    钟锦涛3, 杨航1, 欧阳钧2, 郑明辉1
作者信息 +

Anatomical study on puncture depth of thoracic paravertebral nerve block

  • CHEN Wei-dong1,  QIAN Lei2,  QU Dong-bin1, He Shan-li 2, LI Ze-yu2, TAN Wei-hao3, ZHONG Jin-tao3, Yang Hang1, OU-YANG Jun2,ZHENG Ming-hui1 
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 观察横突、肋横突外侧韧带与脊神经之间的毗邻关系,为提高超声引导下胸椎旁神经阻滞术的安全性及阻滞效能提供解剖学依据。  方法 选用18具标本胸椎节段,取椎板外侧缘和同名脊神经根的十字交点作为测量的起点,分别测量T1~12共12个节段脊神经与横突下后缘中点、肋横突外侧韧带下缘中点之间的距离。根据“3个一组”原则,12个节段共分为4组,记为T1~3组、T4~6组、T7~9组及T10~12组,对不同组别的脊神经-横突间距、脊神经-肋横突外侧韧带间距分别进行单因素方差分析。  结果 (1)脊神经-横突间距:平均为(16.13±5.59)mm,T1~12总体呈先递增后递减的趋势,T5节段最大,为(18.88±5.78)mm,T5向上或向下节段逐渐减小,T1节段为(16.62±3.67)mm,T12节段为(9.76±3.75)mm。自上而下4组的脊神经-横突间距分别为(17.50±4.67)、(18.19±5.62)、(16.92±5.28)及(12.00±4.42)mm,T10~12组相比T1~3组(P<0.01)、T4~6组(P<0.01)、T7~9组(P<0.01)有统计学差异。(2)脊神经-肋横突外侧韧带间距:平均为(17.67±3.76)mm,自上而下4组的间距分别为(16.95±3.82)、(17.55±3.89)、(17.81±3.83)及(18.30±3.43)mm,两两比较均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。  结论 了解脊神经-横突间距、脊神经-肋横突外侧韧带间距利于估算椎旁神经阻滞的安全穿刺深度,以提高阻滞效能,避免脊神经损伤及全脊髓麻醉的风险。

Abstract

Objective To improve the safety and effectiveness of ultrasound-guided paravertebral block through observing the relationship between the spinal nerve and the transverse process or the lateral costotransverse ligament in adult cadavers.     Methods    Eighteen cadavers with normal thoracic spines were collected in this study. The cross point between the lateral edge of the lamina and the thoracic spinal nerve root was taken as the starting point for measurement. The distances between the starting point and the midpoint of the posterior inferior border of transverse process and the midpoint of the inferior border of the lateral costotransverse ligament were measured. According to Mitchell FL's "Three Groups" principle, the adjacent three thoracic segments were divided into 1 group and 12 segments were divided into 4 groups, which were named as T1~3 group, T4~6 group, T7~9 group and T10~12 group, respectively. The one-way ANOVA were performed between the intervals of spinal nerve-transverse process and the intervals of spinal nerve- lateral costotransverse ligament in different groups.    Results    (1)Intervals of spinal nerve-transverse process:average distance was (16.13±5.59) mm. It showed a trend of increasing first and then decreasing from the segment T1 (16.62±3.67) mm to the segment T12(9.76±3.75) mm. The T5 segment was the largest, which was(18.88±5.78) mm. The upwards or downwards from T5 segment gradually decreased. The distance of spinal nerve-transverse process of T1~3 group, T4~6 group, T7~9 group and T10~12 group were (17.50±4.67) mm、(18.19±5.62) mm、(16.92±5.28) mm、(12.00±4.42) mm respectively. There were significant differences among T10~12 and T1~3 (P<0.01), T4~6 (P<0.01), T7~9 group (P<0.01). (2) Intervals of spinal nerve-lateral costotransverse ligament: average distance was (17.67±3.76) mm. The distances of spinal nerve-lateral costotransverse ligament of T1~3 , T4~6 , T7~9 and T10~12 group were (16.95±3.82) mm、(17.55±3.89) mm、(17.81±3.83) mm、(18.30±3.43) mm, respectively. There was no significant difference between each two groups (P>0.05).     Conclusions It is important to pre-estimate the puncture depth before and during ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral nerve block to avoid spinal nerve injury and even spinal anesthesia.

关键词

胸椎旁神经阻滞术 /  超声引导 /  穿刺深度 /  应用解剖学

Key words

Thoracic paravertebral block; Ultrasound-guided; Puncture depth; Applied anatomy 

引用本文

导出引用
陈韦东, 钱蕾, 瞿东滨, 贺善礼, 李泽宇, 谭炜浩, 钟锦涛, 杨航, 欧阳钧, 郑明辉. 胸椎旁神经阻滞术穿刺深度的解剖学研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志. 2020, 38(5): 545-548 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2020.05.010
CHEN Wei-dong, QIAN Lei, QU Dong-bin, He Shan-li, LI Ze-yu, TAN Wei-hao, ZHONG Jin-tao, Yang Hang, OU-YANG Jun, ZHENG Ming-hui. Anatomical study on puncture depth of thoracic paravertebral nerve block[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy. 2020, 38(5): 545-548 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2020.05.010
中图分类号: R322    

参考文献

[1] Womack J, Pearson JD, Walker IA, et al. Safety, complications and clinical outcome after ultrasound-guided paravertebral catheter insertion for rib fracture analgesia: a single-centre retrospective observational study[J]. Anaesthesia, 2019, 74(5): 594-601.
[2] Miyawaki H, Ogata H, Nakamoto S, et al. Effects of thoracic paravertebral block on nociceptive levels after skin incision during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2019, 25: 3140-3145.
[3] Sondekoppam RV, Uppal V, Brookes J, et al. Bilateral thoracic paravertebral blocks compared to thoracic epidural analgesia after midline laparotomy: a pragmatic noninferiority clinical trial[J]. Anesth Analg, 2019, 129(3): 855-863.
[4] Marhofer P, Harrop-Griffiths W, Kettner SC, et al. Fifteen years of ultrasound guidance in regional anaesthesia: part 1[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2010, 104(5): 538-546.
[5] Wang YF, Xu XQ, Yuan HJ. Inadvertent spinal anesthesia during ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral nerve block in a patient with nerve root sheath cyst[J]. A A Pract, 2019: 12(6): 199-201.
[6] Krediet AC, Moayeri N, van Geffen GJ, et al. Different approaches to ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block: an Illustrated review[J]. Anesthesiology, 2015, 123(2): 459-474.
[7] Geelhoed MA, Viti JA, Brewer PA. A pilot study to investigate the validity of the rule of threes of the thoracic spine[J]. J Manual Manipulative Therapy, 2005, 13(2): 91-93.
[8] Moore DC. "No paresthesias-no anesthesia," the nerve stimulator or neither[J]? Reg Anesth, 1997, 22(4): 388-390.
[9] Hu Z, Liu D, Wang ZZ, et al. The efficacy of thoracic paravertebral block for thoracoscopic surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2018, 97(51): e13771.
[10] Reusz G, Sarkany P, Gal J, et al. Needle-related ultrasound artifacts and their importance in anaesthetic practice[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2014, 112(5): 794-802.
[11] Eason MJ, Wyatt R. Paravertebral thoracic block? a reappraisal[J]. Anaesthesia, 1979, 34(7): 638-642.
[12] Richardson J, Cheema SP, Hawkins J, et al. Thoracic paravertebral space location. A new method using pressure measurement[J]. Anaesthesia, 1996, 51(2): 137-139.
[13] Paraskeuopoulos T, Saranteas T, Kouladouros K, et al. Thoracic paravertebral spread using two different ultrasound-guided intercostal injection techniques in human cadavers[J]. Clin Anat, 2010, 23(7): 840-847.
[14] Neal JM, Barrington MJ, Brull R, et al. The second ASRA practice advisory on neurologic complications associated with regional anesthesia and pain medicine: executive summary 2015[J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2015, 40(5): 401-430.
[15] Lang SA. The use of a nerve stimulator for thoracic paravertebral block[J]. Anesthesiology, 2002, 97(2): 521-522.
[16] Cowie B, Mcglade D, Ivanusic J, et al. Ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral blockade: a cadaveric study[J]. Anesth Analg, 2010, 110(6): 1735-1739.
[17] Chelly JE, Uskova A, Merman R, et al. A multifactorial approach to the factors influencing determination of paravertebral depth[J]. Can J Anaesth, 2008, 55(9): 587-594.
[18] Boretsky K, Visoiu M, Bigeleisen P. Ultrasound-guided approach to the paravertebral space for catheter insertion in infants and children[J]. Paediatr Anaesth, 2013, 23(12): 1193-1198.

基金

南方医院院长基金(2017B018)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/