目的 基于CT图像测量不同层面腹主动脉与左侧腰大肌距离(distance between the abdominal aorta and the left psoas major,DALP),分析其影响因素。 方法 回顾116例正常成人CT和临床资料,测量L2-L5椎间盘层面DALP、左侧腰大肌径线、腰大肌横截面积(cross-sectional area,CSA)、主动脉直径,L2椎体横径及面积、L2和脐水平前腹壁脂肪组织厚度、L2和脐水平皮下脂肪组织面积(subcutaneous fat area,SFA)及腹内脂肪组织面积(visceral fat area,VFA),并计算L2和脐水平VFA/SFA;测量82例患者L2~5椎间盘层面左侧腰大肌放射学密度、密度标准差、放射性密度比(radiographic density ratio,RDR)。分析不同椎间盘层面DALP与其他指标的相关性。 结果 DALP于L2~L5呈递减趋势。年龄与L2~L5椎间盘层面DALP呈正相关(均P<0.01)。L2~L3椎间盘层面DALP与该层面腰大肌CSA呈负相关(P<0.01),与L2水平VFA/SFA呈正相关(P<0.05);L3~L4椎间盘层面DALP与腰大肌CSA呈负相关(P<0.01),与L2水平VFA/SFA呈正相关(P<0.01);L4~L5椎间盘层面DALP与该层面腰大肌CSA呈负相关(P<0.01),与L2水平VFA/SFA呈正相关(P<0.05)。 结论 CT图像上,腹主动脉与左侧腰大肌距离与年龄、腰大肌CSA和L2水平VFA/SFA有关;术前行CT检查对OLIF手术具有指导意义。
Abstract
Objective To measure the distance between the abdominal aorta and the left psoas major (DALP) at different levels based on CT images and analyzed its influential factors. Methods The CT and clinical data of 116 normal adults were retrospectively analyzed. The following measurements were taken: DALP, diameter of the left psoas major, cross-sectional area (CSA) of the psoas major, aortic diameter, transverse diameter and area of the L2 vertebral body, thickness of anterior abdominal wall fat at L2 and navel level, subcutaneous fat area (SFA), visceral fat area (VFA) at L2 and navel level. Additionally, VFA/SFA ratios were calculated at both L2 and navel levels. The radiographic density, density standard deviation and radiographic density ratio (RDR) of the left psoas major muscle at three intervertebral disc levels of L2-L5 were measured in 82 patients. The correlation between the DALP and other data at three intervertebral disc levels of L2-L5 was analyzed, and the regression equation was calculated. Results The DALP decreased from level L2 toL5. Age was positively correlated with DALP at L2-L5 disc level (all P<0.01).The DALP at the L2-L3 disc level was negatively correlated with the CSA of the psoas major at the L2-L3 disc level (P<0.01), and positively correlated with the VFA/SFA at L2 level (P<0.05). The DALP was negatively correlated with the CSA of the psoas major at the L3-L4 disc level (P<0.01), and positively correlated with the VFA/SFA at L2 level (P<0.01). The DALP was negatively correlated with the CSA of the psoas major at L4-L5 disc level (P<0.01), and positively correlated with the VFA/SFA at L2 level (P<0.05). Conclusions On CT images, the distance between the abdominal aorta and the left psoas major was influenced by age, CSA of the psoas major and the VFA/SFA at L2 level. Preoperative CT examination is of great significance in guiding the OLIF operation.
关键词
CT /
腹主动脉 /
腰大肌 /
影响因素 /
距离
Key words
CT /
  /
  /
Abdominal aorta /
  /
  /
Psoas major /
  /
  /
Influential factors /
  /
  /
Distance
中图分类号:
R323.3
R816.5 
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Silvestre C, Mac-Thiong JM, Hilmi R, et al. Complications and morbidities of mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion: oblique lumbar interbody fusion in 179 patients[J]. Asian Spine J, 2012, 6(2): 89-97. DOI: 10.4184/asj.2012.6.2.89.
[2] 韩孟龙. 磁共振3D COSMIC序列在斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术术前评估的应用研究[D]. 衡阳: 南华大学, 2021. DOI: 10.27234/d.cnki.gnhuu.2021.000849.
[3] Wang Z, Liu L, Xu XH, et al. The OLIF working corridor based on magnetic resonance imaging: a retrospective research[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2020, 15(1): 141. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-01654-1.
[4] 何华, 孙曾梅, 唐蜀西, 等. Image J测量CT扫描图像脂肪面积的应用[J]. 广东医学,2017, 38(2): 255-258. DOI: 10.13820/j.cnki.gdyx. 2017. 02.016.
[5] 常云峰. 应用放射学方法测量活体胸腰椎推算身高[D]. 成都: 四川大学, 2006.
[6] Mayer HM. A new microsurgical technique for minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1997, 22(6): 691-699, 700. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199703150-00023.
[7] Julian Li JX, Mobbs RJ, Phan K. Morphometric MRI imag-ing study of the corridor for the oblique lumbar interbodyfusion technique at L1~L5[J]. World Neurosurg, 2018,111: e678-e685. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu. 2017.12.136.
[8] Liu L, Liang Y, Zhang H, et al. Imaging anatomical research on the operative windows of oblique lumbar interbody fusion[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(9): e0163452. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163452.
[9] Davis TT, Hynes RA, Fung DA, et al. Retroperitoneal oblique corridor to the L2~S1 intervertebral discs in the lateral position: an anatomic study[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2014, 21(5): 785-793. DOI: 10.3171/2014.7.SPINE13564.
[10]Boghani Z, Steele WI, Barber SM, et al. Variability in the size of the retroperitoneal oblique corridor: a magnetic resonance imaging-based analysis[J]. Surg Neurol Int, 2020, 11: 54. DOI: 10.25259/SNI_438_2019.
[11] 左玉强, 柳青, 关兴, 等. CT定量测量骨骼肌脂肪浸润程度预测老年肌少症价值分析[J]. 临床放射学杂志, 2021, 40(11): 2173-2177. DOI: 10.13437/j.cnki.jcr.2021.11.027.
[12] Aringhieri G, Salle DG, Catanese S, et al. Abdominal visceral-to-subcutaneous fat volume ratio predicts survival and response to first-line palliative chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer[J]. Cancers, 2023, 15(22): 5391. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15225391.
[13]Ozoya OO, Siegel EM, Srikumar T, et al. Quantitative assessment of visceral obesity and postoperative colon cancer outcomes[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2017, 21(3): 534-542. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-017-3362-9.
[14]黄露, 王哲涛, 罗凤鸣. 腹部脂肪分布与肺通气功能的关系研究[J]. 华西医学, 2022, 37(1): 27-32. DOI: 10.7507/1002-0179.202012128.
[15]贺用礼, 刘平均, 王长青, 等. 胸腰椎影像学测量及其临床意义[J]. 中国现代医药杂志, 2012, 14(9): 7-10. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9463. 2012. 09.003.
基金
潍坊市科技发展计划项目(2020YX036)