股前外侧穿支皮瓣的个性化精准设计：十年1079例临床疗效分析

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2024.5.04

PDF(2704 KB)

中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5) : 510-516. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2024.5.04

股前外侧皮瓣

股前外侧穿支皮瓣的个性化精准设计：十年1079例临床疗效分析

唐举玉^1,2，孙念哲^1,2，吴攀峰^1,2，俞芳^1,2，曾磊^1,2，卿黎明^1,2，
肖勇兵^1,2，潘丁1,2，刘睿^1,2，符劲飞^1,2，贺继强^1,2，李诚^1,2

作者信息 +

Individualized precision design of anterolateral thigh perforator flaps: a clinical effectiveness analysis of 1079 cases over ten years

Tang Juyu^1,2, Sun Nianzhe^1,2, Wu Panfeng^1,2, Yu Fang^1,2, Zeng Lei^1,2, Qing Liming^1,2, Xiao Yongbing^1,2, Pan Ding^1,2, Liu Rui^1,2, Fu Jinfei^1,2, He Jiqiang^1,2, Li Cheng^1,2

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

目的探讨个性化精准设计的股前外侧穿支皮瓣重建各种复杂组织缺损的临床疗效。方法回顾分析我科2013年1月-2023年1月采用个性化精准设计的各种股前外侧穿支皮瓣修复的1079例患者的临床疗效。以旋股外侧动脉降支为血管蒂切取1013例（其中小儿65例）、横支为血管蒂切取40例、斜支为血管蒂切取26例（小儿1例），以旋股内侧动脉或股动脉来源穿支为蒂切取9例。其中传统股前外侧穿支皮瓣游离移植441例、带蒂转移27例、特殊形式穿支皮瓣基本术式511例、衍生术式100例。修复下肢787例，上肢264例，躯干部17例，头颈部4例，上述多部位7例。并对各种个性化精准设计的股前外侧穿支皮瓣术后临床疗效及并发症发生率进行统计比较。结果本组1079例股前外侧穿支皮瓣中，术后顺利成活1063例，其中发生血管危象行探查术成活14例，总成功率为98.52%。比较游离股前外侧穿支皮瓣、带蒂转移、特殊形式穿支皮瓣基本术式和衍生术式各组成功率，结果显示各组间成功率无明显差异（P>0.05）。本组1079例股前外侧穿支皮瓣主要并发症发生情况：静脉危象35例（3.24%），动脉危象22例（2.04%），感染19例（1.76%），切口延迟愈合6例（0.56%），完全坏死16例（1.48%），部分坏死35例（3.24%）。统计学分析显示静脉危象方面特殊形式穿支皮瓣基本类型组发生率低于衍生术式组（P<0.001），切口感染方面带蒂转移组发生率高于特殊形式穿支皮瓣组（P =0.007），切口延迟愈合方面传统游离移植组发生率高于特殊形式穿支皮瓣组（P=0.04），皮瓣部分坏死方面带蒂转移组发生率高于特殊形式穿支皮瓣组（P=0.008）。结论股前外侧穿支皮瓣个性化精准设计，可以获得良好的临床疗效，值得临床推广应用。

Abstract

Objectives To investigate the clinical efficacy of individualized precision design using anterolateral thigh perforator flaps for reconstructing various complex tissue defects. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 1079 patients who underwent reconstruction using individualized precision-designed anterolateral thigh perforator flaps at our department from January 2013 to January 2023. The descending branches of the lateral circumflex femoral artery were utilized as the vascular pedicle (including 65 pediatric cases) in 1013 cases, transverse branches in 40 cases, oblique branches (including 1 pediatric case) in 26 cases, and descending branch of the medial circumflex femoral artery or femoral artery perforators as the pedicle in 9 cases. Procedures included 441 cases of free flap transplantation, 27 cases of pedicle transfer, 511 cases of basic types of special form perforator flaps, and 100 cases of derivatives. Defects repaired included 787 cases in the lower limbs, 264 cases in upper limbs, 17 cases in trunk, 4 cases in head-neck region and 7 cases in multiple sites. Postoperative clinical outcomes and complication rates of various individualized precision designs of anterolateral thigh perforator flaps were statistically analyzed and compared. Results Among the 1079 cases of anterolateral thigh perforator flaps, 1063 cases survived postoperatively, with 14 cases undergoing vascular exploration due to vascular crisis, yielding an overall success rate of 98.52%. Comparison of success rates among free anterolateral thigh perforator flaps, pedicled flaps, basic types and derivatives of special form perforator flaps revealed no significant differences in success rates (P>0.05). Complications included venous crisis in 35 cases (3.24%), arterial crisis in 22 cases (2.04%), infection in 19 cases (1.76%), delayed wound healing in 6 cases (0.56%), complete necrosis in 16 cases (1.48%), and partial necrosis in 35 cases (3.24%). In terms of venous crisis, the incidence rate of perforator flaps in basic types group was lower than that in derivatives group (P<0.001). Regarding wound infection, the incidence rate in pedicled flap group was higher than that of basic types group (P = 0.007). For delayed wound healing, the incidence rate of perforator flaps in traditional free flaps group was higher than that in basic types group (P = 0.04). In terms of partial flap necrosis, the incidence rate in pedicled flap group was higher than that of basic types group (P=0.008). Conclusions Individualized precision design of anterolateral thigh perforator flaps could achieve favorable clinical outcomes and merit further clinical application and promotion.

导出引用

唐举玉, 孙念哲, 吴攀峰, 俞芳, 曾磊, 卿黎明, 肖勇兵, 潘丁, 刘睿, 符劲飞, 贺继强, 李诚. 股前外侧穿支皮瓣的个性化精准设计：十年1079例临床疗效分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志. 2024, 42(5): 510-516 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2024.5.04

Tang Juyu, Sun Nianzhe, Wu Panfeng, Yu Fang, Zeng Lei, Qing Liming, Xiao Yongbing, Pan Ding, Liu Rui, Fu Jinfei, He Jiqiang, Li Cheng. Individualized precision design of anterolateral thigh perforator flaps: a clinical effectiveness analysis of 1079 cases over ten years[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy. 2024, 42(5): 510-516 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2024.5.04

中图分类号： R622

参考文献

[1] 唐举玉, 魏在荣, 张世民, 等. 穿支皮瓣的临床应用原则专家共识[J]. 中华显微外科杂志, 2016, 39(2): 105-106. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-2036.2016.02.001.
[2] Koshima I, Soeda S. Inferior epigastric artery skin flaps without rectus abdominis muscle[J]. Br J Plast Surg, 1989, 42(6): 645-648. DOI: 10.1016/0007-1226(89)90075-1.
[3] 唐举玉, 徐达传, 徐永清, 等. 特殊形式穿支皮瓣及其衍生术式命名专家共识[J]. 中华显微外科杂志, 2022, 45(1): 5-13. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441206-20220114-00010.
[4] 唐举玉. 穿支皮瓣的基础理论与基本技术[J]. 中华显微外科杂志, 2022, 45(2): 222-226. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cm441206-20220403-00068.
[5] 孙丰文, 杨林, 程俊楠, 等. 股前外侧皮瓣设计法与切取法的研究进展[J]. 中国美容整形外科杂志, 2023, 34(3): 158-161.
[6] 唐举玉. 重视穿支皮瓣设计进一步提升我国创面修复水平[J]. 中华整形外科杂志, 2022, 38(10): 1079-1084. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn114453-20221010-00310.
[7] 唐举玉, 卿黎明, 吴攀峰, 等. 一种股前外侧穿支皮瓣血管切取的方法—逆行四面解剖法[J]. 中华显微外科杂志, 2021, 44(2): 137-140. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441206-20200303-00121.
[8] 许来雨, 彭伶丽, 黄伟红, 等. 皮瓣移植术后血管危象识别与防控管理信息系统的开发及应用研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2022, 57(11): 1291-1296. DOI: 10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2022.11.002.
[9] Jc D, Fs C. Precision medicine in 2030-seven ways to transform healthcare[J]. Cell,2021, 184(6):1415-1419. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell. 2021. 01.015.
[10]L Hood, SH Friend. Predictive, personalized, preventive, participatory (P4) cancer medicine[J]. Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2011, 8(3):184-187. DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2010.227.
[11]李娜, 马麟, 詹启敏. 科技创新与精准医学[J]. 精准医学杂志, 2018, 33(1): 3-5, 8. DOI: 10.13362/j.jpmed.201801003.
[12]孔亚林, 刘承利, 刘磊, 等. 基于精准外科理念的外科学教育改革[J]. 医学理论与实践,2017, 30(10): 1549-1551. DOI: 10.19381/j.issn. 1001-7585.2017.10.084.
[13]李显勇, 李平华, 李腊梅, 等. 股前外侧游离皮瓣修复上肢创面的临床应用[J]. 实用手外科杂志, 2023, 37(4): 491-493.
[14]唐林. 特殊形式穿支皮瓣修复四肢复杂创面的临床研究[D]. 泸州: 西南医科大学, 2024.
[15]黄永涛, 杨林, 巨积辉. 以旋股外侧动脉各分支为蒂的股前外侧皮瓣临床应用研究进展[J]. 中国美容整形外科杂志, 2023, 34(7): 412-415.
[16]Agostini T, Lazzeri D, Spinelli G. Anterolateral thigh flap: systematic literature review of specific donor-site complications and their management[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2013, 41(1): 15-21.DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.05.003
[17]王剑利, 刘兴龙, 赵刚, 等. 传统皮瓣与穿支皮瓣的临床回顾对比研究[J]. 中国骨与关节杂志, 2015, 4(2): 128-132.
[18]刘嘉玥, 陈勇, 王倩, 等. 带蒂股外侧肌（皮）瓣在下肢复杂性创面修复中的应用[J]. 组织工程与重建外科, 2023, 19(5): 440-445. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-0364.2023.05.002.
[19]唐举玉, 贺继强, 吴攀峰, 等. 旋股外侧动脉降支嵌合穿支皮瓣立体修复合并深部死腔的下肢软组织缺损[J]. 中华显微外科杂志, 2018, 41(5): 424–427. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-2036.2018.05.003.
[20]唐举玉. 特殊形式穿支皮瓣及其衍生术式的分型与命名[J]. 中华显微外科杂志, 2021, 44(3): 245-254. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441206-20210530-00193.
[21]谢文斌, 王海文, 江新明, 等. 血流桥接股前外侧穿支皮瓣修复伴有血供障碍手掌皮肤软组织缺损[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2016, 34(1): 24-27. DOI:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2016.01.007.
[22]王伟, 周征兵, 程冬冬, 等. 联体股前外侧穿支皮瓣修复足踝部大面积软组织缺损[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2022, 36(9): 1178-1180. DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202204003.
[23]单振锋, 周晓, 喻建军, 等. 应用血管化游离组织瓣修复头颈部肿瘤缺损时血管危象的临床分析[J]. 河南医学研究, 2022, 31(8): 1351-1354. DOI: 10.3969./j.issn.1004-437X.2022.08.002.
[24]Bekara F, Herlin C, Somda S, et al. Free versus perforator-pedicled propeller flaps in lower extremity reconstruction: What is the safest coverage? A meta-analysis[J]. Microsurgery, 2018, 38(1): 109-119. DOI: 10.1002/micr.30047.
[25]刘元波, 王欣, 张世民, 等. 《带蒂穿支皮瓣常见并发症原因分析与防治》专家共识[J]. 中华显微外科杂志, 2017, 40(2): 105-108. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-2036.2017.02.001.
[26]Sisti A, D’Aniello C, Fortezza L, et al. Propeller Flaps: A Literature Review[J]. In Vivo, 2016, 30(4): 351-373.
[27]王欣, 刘元波, 张世民, 等. 《游离穿支皮瓣常见并发症原因分析与防治》专家共识[J]. 中华显微外科杂志, 2017, 40(3): 209-212. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-2036.2017.03.001.