高浓度低流速对比剂联合低管电压方案行腹部CT血管成像的可行性

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2024.1.18

PDF(2259 KB)

中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1) : 99-103. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2024.1.18

临床研究

高浓度低流速对比剂联合低管电压方案行腹部CT血管成像的可行性

周伟¹，石倩倩²，李盖¹，陈伟彬¹*

作者信息 +

Feasibility of abdominal CT angiography with high concentration and low velocity contrast agent combined with low tube voltage

Zhou Wei¹, Shi Qianqian², Li Gai¹, Chen Weibin¹*

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

目的探讨腹主动脉CTA应用高浓度、低流速对比剂注射联合低管电压方案的可行性。方法前瞻性收集430例行腹主动脉CA患者，分为A组（215例）和B组（215例），A组采用碘帕醇（370 mgI/mL），剂量400 mgI/kg，流速5 mL/s，管电压120 kV，B组采用碘美普尔（400 mgI/ mL），剂量300 mgI/kg，流速4 mL/s，管电压100 kV。比较两组患者图像质量、腹主动脉及分支的CT值，以及有效辐射剂量等指标。结果与A组比较，B组患者肾动脉显示分级及图像质量评分更优，腹主动脉、腹腔干、肠系膜上下动脉及左右肾动脉CT值更高，辐射剂量明显降低（3.94±0.62）vs（12.25±1.19）mSv，注射碘总量更少，对比剂外渗发生率更低，均P<0.05；两组信噪比、对比度噪声比无统计学差异（P>0.05）。结论高浓度低流速对比剂联合低管电压方案可有效降低辐射剂量、注射碘总量及对比剂外渗等风险。

Abstract

Objective To explore the feasibility of using high concentration and low flow rate contrast agents combined with low tube voltage injection in abdominal aortic CTA. Methods Four hundred and thirty patients with abdominal aortic CT angiography were retrospectively collected and divided into group A (215 cases) and group B (215 cases). Group A was treated with iopamidol (370 mgI/ml) and administered at 400 mgI/kg, with a flow rate of 5 ml/s and a tube voltage of 120 kV. Group B was treated with lomeprol (400 mgI/ml) and administered at 300 mgI/kg, with a flow rate of 4 ml/s and a tube voltage of 100 kV. The image quality score, CT values of abdominal aorta and branches, effective radiation dose, and other indicators between the two groups were compared. Results Compared with Group A, the renal artery vascular display grading and image quality score in group B were better, the CT values of the abdominal aorta, abdominal trunk, superior and inferior mesenteric arteries, and left and right renal arteries were higher, the radiation dose significantly decreased from (3.94±0.62) to (12.25±1.19) mSv (P<0.05), the total amount of iodine injected was less and the incidence of contrast agent extravasation was lower, all P<0.05. There was no statistical difference in signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio between the two groups (P>0.05) Conclusions The combination of high concentration, low flow rate contrast agent and low tube voltage scheme can effectively reduce the risk of radiation dose, total injected iodine and contrast agent extravasation.

导出引用

周伟, 石倩倩, 李盖, 陈伟彬. 高浓度低流速对比剂联合低管电压方案行腹部CT血管成像的可行性[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志. 2024, 42(1): 99-103 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2024.1.18

Zhou Wei, Shi Qianqian, Li Gai, Chen Weibin. Feasibility of abdominal CT angiography with high concentration and low velocity contrast agent combined with low tube voltage[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy. 2024, 42(1): 99-103 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2024.1.18

中图分类号： R813

参考文献

[1] 曹力科, 林锦仕. CT血管成像对腹主动脉粥样硬化斑块的临床评价价值[J]. 黑龙江医学, 2016, 40(7): 637-639. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5775.2016.07.027.
[2] 张圆圆, 孟秀君, 田沈, 等. 颈部彩色多普勒超声、CT血管成像与数字减影血管造影诊断颈内动脉狭窄、斑块形态及溃疡的准确性比较[J]. 中国全科医学,2015, 18(30): 3763-3768. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn. 1007-9572.2015.30.028.
[3] Pistolesi V, Regolisti G, Morabito S, et al. Contrast medium induced acute kidney injury: a narrative review[J]. Nephrol, 2018, 31(6): 797-812. DOI: 10.1007/s40620-018-0498-y.
[4] 中华医学会放射学分会腹部学组. 碘美普尔(碘浓度400 mg/mL)肝脏CT应用专家共识[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2020, 54(1): 3-9. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1201.2020.01.002.
[5] 梁振华, 黄钰坚, 方挺松, 等. 双低剂量CT主动脉血管造影的应用研究[J]. 海南医学, 2019, 30(13): 1711-1714. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6350.2019.13.021.
[6] 陈伟彬, 冯莉, 宫凤玲, 等. 探讨256层螺旋CT血管造影对主肾动脉及肾段动脉的显示[J]. 医学影像学杂志, 2014, 24(5): 782-785. CNKI: SUN:XYXZ.0.2014-05-026.
[7] McCollough C, Cody D, Edyvean S, et al. The measurement, reporting, and management of radiation dose in CT[J]. AAPM, 2008, 23(23): 1-28. DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2007.912542.
[8] Wei L, Li S, Gao Q, et al. Use of low tube voltage and low contrast agent concentration yields good image quality for aortic CT angiography[J]. Clin Radiol, 2016, 71(12): 1313.e5-1313.e10. DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.07.018.
[9] 王婕妤, 乔伟, 黎秋菊, 等. 低管电压结合低剂量对比剂在64层螺旋CT头颈部血管成像中的应用[J]. 中国医学影像学杂志, 2015, 23(7): 481-485. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-5185.2015.07.001.
[10] 杜煜, 时高峰, 王亚宁. 探讨双源CT颈动脉造影低管电压扫描的可行性[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2012, 28(11): 2079-2082. CNKI: SUN:ZYXX.0.2012-11-046.
[11] 余红胜, 沈又利, 刘义康. “双低”技术主动脉MSCTA临床应用研究[J]. 医疗卫生装备, 2017, 38(2): 76-79, 88. DOI: 10.7687/J.ISSN1003-8868.2017.02.076.
[12]Maffei E, Arcadi T, La Grutta L, et al. Abdominal Computed Tomography Angiography at 80 kV: feasibility study[J]. Acta Biomed, 2015, 86(3): 234-241. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1673.2004.01275.x.
[13] Bae KT. Intravenous contrast medium administration and scan timing at CT: considerations and approaches[J]. Radiology, 2010, 256(1): 32-61. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10090908.
[14] 杨建华, 刘亚龙, 贾维. 不同浓度碘对比剂应用于腹部血管CT的增强效能比较研究[J]. 中外医学研究, 2020, 18(36): 58-60. DOI: 10.14033/j.cnki.cfmr.2020.36.023.
[15]中华医学会放射学分会对比剂安全使用工作组. 碘对比剂使用指南[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2013, 47(10): 869-872. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2013.47.10.869.
[16]Hazirolan T, Turkbey B, Akpinar E, et al. The impact of warmed intravenous contrast material on the bolus geometry of coronary CT angiography applications[J]. Korean J Radiol, 2009, 10(2): 150-155. DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2009.10.2.150.
[17]Seehofnerová A, Kok M, Mihl C, et al. Feasibility of low contrast media volume in CT angiography of the aorta[J]. Eur J Radiol Open, 2015, 2: 58-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejro.2015.03.001.