颈椎前路多节段融合术后邻椎病的再手术策略

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2023.2.17

PDF(3631 KB)

中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2) : 218-223. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2023.2.17

临床研究

颈椎前路多节段融合术后邻椎病的再手术策略

涂强^1,2,3,4，孙昊⁴，陈虎³，朱昌荣¹，陈育岳¹，黄显华¹
刘永刚¹，马向阳¹，王建华¹，章凯¹，夏虹¹*

作者信息 +

The surgical treatment strategy for adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion of multi-segments

Tu Qiang^1,2,3,4, Sun Hao⁴, Chen Hu³, Zhu Changrong¹, Chen Yuyue¹, Huang Xianhua¹, Liu Yonggang¹, Ma Xiangyang¹, Wang Jianhua¹, Zhang Kai¹, Xia Hong¹*

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

目的探讨颈椎前路多节段融合术后邻椎病的手术治疗策略。方法对2015年至2020年我院收治的13例颈椎前路多节段融合术后邻椎病再手术治疗的患者进行回顾分析，采取颈椎前路Zero-P钢板固定术治疗8例单节段邻椎病，后路颈椎单开门椎管扩大成形术治疗5例2个节段邻椎病，采用JOA评分、VAS评分及NDI指数进行疗效评价，分析X线、CT或MRI影像学表现。结果本组所有病例得到随访，平均随访11.6个月（6~24个月）。两种术式术后患者JOA评分、VAS评分、NDI指数均得到显著改善。颈椎前路Zero-P钢板术后内固定物位置良好，随访未见钢板螺钉松动，骨融合平均时间为7.6个月。颈椎后路单开门椎管扩大成形术治疗患者均未出现C5神经根麻痹、椎板再关门等并发症。结论颈椎前路多节段融合术后邻椎病再手术方式的选择应遵循个体化原则，单节段邻椎病且不伴严重后纵韧带骨化，可选择前路减压融合Zero-P固定术；邻椎病变节段≥2处，可选择后路单开门椎管扩大成形术。

Abstract

Objective To explore the surgical treatment strategy for adjacent segment disease (ASD) after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion of multi-segments. Methods From 2015 to 2019, 13 patients with ASD in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Eight patients were treated with anterior cervical Zero-P plate and 5 patients were treated with single-door laminoplasty. JOA, VAS, and NDI were noted to evaluate the clinical outcomes, and X-ray, CT, and MRI imaging were recorded and analyzed as well. Results All the patients were followed up for an average of 11.6 months (6~24 months). The JOA, VAS and NDI were significantly improved after both surgeries. In the anterior cervical operation group, the position of the internal fixation was good and no loosening of the plate screw was observed during follow-up. The average time of bone fusion was about 7.6 months. In patients who were treated with single-door laminoplasty, there were no complications such as C5 nerve root palsy, lamina re-closing and so on. Conclusions The selection of reoperation methods for ASD after multilevel anterior cervical fusion should follow the principle of individualization. For single-level ASD without severe posterior longitudinal ligament ossification, anterior decompression and fusion with the Zero-P system should be selected. For multi-levels ASD, the posterior single-door laminoplasty is preferred.

导出引用

涂强, 孙昊, 陈虎, 朱昌荣, 陈育岳, 黄显华, 刘永刚, 马向阳, 王建华, 章凯, 夏虹. 颈椎前路多节段融合术后邻椎病的再手术策略[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志. 2023, 41(2): 218-223 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2023.2.17

The surgical treatment strategy for adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion of multi-segments[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy. 2023, 41(2): 218-223 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2023.2.17

中图分类号： R681.5

参考文献

[1] Harada GK, Alter K, Nguyen AQ, et al. Cervical Spine endplate abnormalities and association with pain, disability, and adjacent segment degeneration after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2020, 45(15): E917-E926. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003460.
[2] Hirvonen T, Siironen J, Marjamaa J, et al. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in young adults leads to favorable outcome in long-term follow-up[J]. Spine J, 2020, 20(7): 1073-1084. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.03.016.
[3] Lawrence BD, Hilibrand AS, Brodt ED, et al. Predicting the risk of adjacent segment pathology in the cervical spine: a systematic review[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2012, 37(22 Suppl): S52-S64. DOI: 10.1097/brs.0b013e31826d60fb.
[4]Hussain M, Nassr A, Natarajan RN, et al. Biomechanics of adjacent segments after a multilevel cervical corpectomy using anterior, posterior, and combined anterior-posterior instrumentation techniques: a finite element model study[J]. Spine J, 2013, 13(6): 689-696. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.02.062.
[5] Matsumoto M, Okada E, Ichihara D, et al. Anterior cervical decompression and fusion accelerates adjacent segment degeneration: comparison with asymptomatic volunteers in a ten-year magnetic resonance imaging follow-up study[J]. Spine, 2010, 35(1): 36-43. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b8a80d.
[6] Chan SC，Ferguson SJ，Wuertz K，et al. Biological response of the intervertebral disc to repetitive short-term cyclic torsion[J]. Spine, 2011, 36(24): 2021-2030. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318203aea5.
[7] 韦竑宇, 蒋欣, 谭明生. 颈椎前路钢板固定融合术后邻近节段骨化发生的因素[J]. 中日友好医院学报, 2009, 23(2): 70-72. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0025.2009.02.002.
[8] 罗春山, 赵国权, 梁栋柱, 等. C5/6椎间隙不同撑开高度对临近椎间盘压力的研究分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2015, 33(6): 696-699. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2015.06.017.
[9] Zhang Yijian, Shao Yijie, Liu Hao, et al. Association between sagittal balance and adjacent segment degeneration in anterior cervical surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2019, 20(1): 430. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-019-2800-0.
[10]Coric D, Kim PK, Clemente JD, et al. Prospective randomized study of cervical arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with long-term follow-up: results in 74 patients from a single site[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2013, 18(1): 36-42. DOI: 10.3171/2012.9.SPINE12555.
[11]盛斌, 黄象望, 向铁城, 等. 人工颈椎间盘置换治疗前路颈椎减压融合术后相邻节段病的中期随访观察[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2012, 23(11): 1050-1052. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-406X.2013.11.23.