影响因素预测小儿肠套叠空气灌肠整复失败的价值

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2022.6.20

中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6): 738-742.doi: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2022.6.20

影响因素预测小儿肠套叠空气灌肠整复失败的价值

杨绍伟¹，陈瑜¹，肖霞²，刘帆¹，黄穗¹*

1.华中科技大学同济医学院附属武汉儿童医院放射科，武汉 430016； 2.华中科技大学同济医学院附属
武汉儿童医院妇幼超声影像科，武汉 430016

收稿日期:2022-07-05 出版日期:2022-11-25 发布日期:2022-12-26
通讯作者: 黄穗，主任医师，E-mail：huangsuidf@sina.com
作者简介:杨绍伟（1986-），男，江西抚州人，硕士，研究方向：儿科影像诊断学，E-mail：hustysw@126.com
基金资助:
武汉市卫生健康委医学科研项目（WX21Z71）

The value of influencing factors in predicting air enema failure in children with intussusception

Yang Shaowei¹, Chen Yu¹, Xiao Xia², Liu Fan¹, Huang Sui¹*

1.Department of Radiology, Wuhan Children's Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430016, China; 2. Department of Maternal and Children's Ultrasound Imaging, Wuhan Children's Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430016, China

Received:2022-07-05 Online:2022-11-25 Published:2022-12-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的探讨各影响因素对小儿肠套叠空气灌肠整复失败的预测价值。方法回顾性分析2012年1月~2019年12月武汉儿童医院收治的肠套叠患儿临床资料，包括性别、年龄、病程、阵发性哭吵/腹痛、血便、呕吐、发热、腹泻、腹部包块、住院时间、肠梗阻、套叠影位置、肠套叠类型、空气灌肠整复、手术治疗情况等。单因素分析采用Mann-Whitney U检验或卡方检验，二元logistic回归分析确定独立影响因素，ROC曲线分析各因素预测整复失败的价值。结果年龄、病程≥48 h、阵发性哭吵/腹痛、血便、呕吐、发热、腹泻、腹部包块、肠梗阻、套叠影位于左半结肠及住院时间在整复成功组和失败组间差异均有统计学意义（均P<0.05）。性别分布在两组间差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。回归分析显示年龄是整复失败的保护因素，而病程时间≥48 h、血便、呕吐、发热、腹部包块、肠梗阻及套叠影位于左半结肠是危险因素。ROC曲线分析显示套叠影位于左半结肠、年龄、血便及肠梗阻均有一定预测准确性，其中年龄最佳截断点为10.5个月；肠梗阻、血便、年龄及套叠影位于左半结肠联合预测可提高准确性。结论年龄≤10.5个月、血便、肠梗阻及套叠影位于左半结肠预测整复失败均有一定准确性，联合预测准确性更高。

关键词: , 小儿肠套叠, , , 空气灌肠, , , 整复失败, , , 影响因素, , , 预测

Abstract: Objective To explore the value of various influencing factors in predicting air enema failure in children with intussusception. Methods Clinical data of children with intussusception admitted to Wuhan Children's Hospital from January 2012 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed, including gender, age, duration of disease, paroxysmal crying or abdominal pain, bloody stool, vomiting, fever, diarrhea, abdominal mass, hospital stay, intestinal obstruction, intussusception position, intussusception type, and results of air enema and surgery treatment. Mann-Whitney U test or Chi-square test was used in univariate analysis. Independent influencing factors were determined by binary logistic regression analysis, and the value of various factors to predict the enema failure was analyzed by the AUC value of the ROC curve. Results There were statistical differences in age, duration of disease ≥ 48h, paroxysmal crying or abdominal pain, bloody stool, vomiting, fever, diarrhea, abdominal mass, intestinal obstruction, intussusception located in the left colon and hospitalization time between the successful and failed groups (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in the gender distribution between the two groups (P>0.05). Regression analysis result showed that age was a protective factor for enema failure, while the duration of disease≥48 h, blood stool, vomiting, fever, abdominal mass, intestinal obstruction, and intussusception in the left colon were risk factors. ROC analysis result showed that intussusception located in the left colon, age, blood stool, and intestinal obstruction had certain predictive accuracy; and the best cut-off point for age was 10.5 months. Joint prediction with intestinal obstruction, bloody stool, age, and intussusception located in the left colon could improve the accuracy. Conclusions Age≤10.5 months, blood stool, intestinal obstruction, and intussusception located in the left colon have certain accuracy in predicting enema failure, and the accuracy will be higher when joint prediction.

Key words: Pediatric intussusception, , , , Air enema, , , , Enema failure, Influencing factors, Prediction

中图分类号:

R574.3

杨绍伟, 陈瑜, 肖霞, 刘帆, 黄穗. 影响因素预测小儿肠套叠空气灌肠整复失败的价值[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2022, 40(6): 738-742.

Yang Shaowei, Chen Yu, Xiao Xia, Liu Fan, Huang Sui. The value of influencing factors in predicting air enema failure in children with intussusception[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2022, 40(6): 738-742.

参考文献 16

[1]	Kim PH, Hwang J, Yoon HM, et al. Predictors of failed enema reduction in children with intussusception: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur Radiol, 2021, 31(11): 8081-8097. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-07935-5.
[2]	Xie XL, Wu Y, Wang Q, et al. Risk factors for failure of hydrostatic reduction of intussusceptionin pediatric patients: a retrospective study[J]. Medicine (Baltimore),2019, 98(1): e13826. DOI: 10.1097/MD. 0000000000013826.
[3]	Hu J, Liu M, Yu X, et al. Clinical characteristics of intussusception with surgical reduction: a single-center experience with 568 cases[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2019, 23(11): 2255-2262. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-019-04178-0.
[4]	Gondek AS, Riaza L, Cuadras D, et al. Ileocolic intussusception: predicting the probability of success of ultrasound guided saline enema from clinical and sonographic data[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2018, 53(4): 599-604. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.10.050.
[5]	Nisar MU, Sikander S, Khan NA, et al. Determinants of bowel resection in childhood intussusception[J]. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad, 2020, 32(1): 9-12. PMID: 32468746.
[6]	Lim RZM, Lee T, Ng JYZ, et al. Factors associated with ultrasound-guided water enema reduction for pediatric intussusception in resource-limited setting: potential predictive role of thrombocytosis and anemia[J]. J Pediatr Surg,2018, 53(11): 2312-2317. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg. 2018.01.004.
[7]	Khorana J, Singhavejsakul J, Ukarapol N, et al. Prognostic indicators for failed nonsurgical reduction of intussusception[J]. Ther Clin Risk Manag, 2016, 12: 1231-1237. DOI: 10.2147/TCRM.S109785.
[8]	何晓俊, 秦增辉, 马新瑜, 等. 小儿肠套叠空气灌肠规范化诊疗的探讨[J]. 放射学实践, 2010, 25(5): 559-562. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0313.2010.05.026.
[9]	Ajao AE, Lawal TA, Ogundoyin OO, et al. Clinical predictors and outcome of bowel resection in paediatric intussusception[J]. Afr Health Sci, 2020, 20(3): 1463-1470. DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v20i3.52.
[10]	Patel DM, Loewen JM, Braithwaite KA, et al. Radiographic findings predictive of irreducibility and surgical resection in ileocolic intussusception[J]. Pediatr Radiol, 2020, 50(9): 1249-1254. DOI: 10.1007/s00247-020-04695-0.
[11]	Huang HY, Lin XK, Guo SK, et al. Haemostatic indexes for predicting intestinal necrosis in children with intussusception[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2021, 91(7-8): 1485-1490. DOI:10.1111/ans.16854.
[12]	刘峰, 吴洁, 孙倩, 等. 超声联合相关因素预测小儿肠套叠水压灌肠复位成败的价值评估[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2018, 34(5): 431-434. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0101.2018.05.014.
[13]	Shen G, Zhang C, Li J, et al. Risk factors for short-term recurrent intussusception and reduction failure after ultrasound-guided saline enema[J]. Pediatr Surg Int, 2018, 34(11): 1225-1231. DOI: 10.1007/s00383-018-4340-3.
[14]	Xie X L, Yang WU, Wang Q, et al. A randomized trial of pneumatic reductionversus hydrostatic reduction for intussusception in pediatric patients[J]. JPediatr Surg, 2018, 53(8): 1464-1468. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.08.005.
[15]	Huang HY, Huang XZ, Han YJ, et al. Risk factors associated with intestinal necrosis in children with failed non-surgical reduction for intussusception[J]. Pediatr Surg Int, 2017, 33(5): 575-580. DOI: 10.1007/s00383-017-4060-0.
[16]	Levinson H, Rimon A, Scolnik D, et al. Fever as a presenting symptom in children evaluated for ileocolic intussusception: the experience of a large tertiary care pediatric hospital[J]. Pediatr Emerg Care, 2019, 35(2): 121-124. DOI: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001391.

影响因素预测小儿肠套叠空气灌肠整复失败的价值

The value of influencing factors in predicting air enema failure in children with intussusception

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 16

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	江剑宏, 段仁鹏, 李晓锋. 国人胆道三维重建解剖变异应用研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 1-4.
[2]	郭红志, 王瑜, 张加琪, 梁海彬, 马梓玮, 冯伟, 吴忧, 司子燚. 血管铸型结合CT三维模型评估先兆子痫胎盘血管结构[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 5-10.
[3]	李佳伟, 张静, 李灿然, 兰文杰, 籍庆余, 郭志勇, 张云凤, 刘启, 陈清威, 李筱贺. 蒙古族人群股骨近端解剖参数X线测量[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 11-16.
[4]	李琨, 张燕, 郭冉, 郝咪咪, 吴轩宇, 徐艺芳, 王超群, 马文童, 张灵淇, 杨宏宇, 李志军, 张少杰, 王星. 儿童及青少年枕颈角与后枕颈角数字化测量及其临床意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 17-20.
[5]	李文, 杨思艺, 黄蕾, 卿霁雯, 蒋松涛, 张磊. 基于MRI探讨Lisfranc韧带的形态学特点及临床意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 21-25.
[6]	李凡凡, 徐阳, 王晓旭. 紫草素调节Nrf2/HO-1信号通路对实验性大鼠肉芽肿性小叶性乳腺炎的治疗作用研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 26-32.
[7]	王兴航, 丁佳媛, 李放, 包翠芬, 阎丽菁. 人参皂苷Rg1通过抑制NLRP3炎症小体途径减轻氧糖剥夺/复供后小胶质细胞炎症反应[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 33-41.
[8]	程莹莹, 武建军, 蔡海燕, 焦旭文, 马江波, 丁银秀. 体外炎性诱导星形胶质细胞激活及功能分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 42-46.
[9]	祁志, 杨力, 贾秋叶, 陈浩伦, 段兆达, 吴春云. 依达拉奉经MAPKs通路对脂多糖激活的小胶质细胞Sirt3表达调控[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 47-53.
[10]	张晶晶, 王洪新. 黄芩苷通过PDGF/P38 MAPK信号通路对肺动脉高压大鼠的保护作用[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 54-58.
[11]	乐钦, 陈荣丽, 熊婧熙, 王婷怡, 蔡志恒, 易秋实, 曾心怡. 白芨多糖对大鼠跨区皮瓣choke区的影响[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 59-64.
[12]	李笑予, 张磊, 付磊, 李东波, 汪国友. 三步接骨法治疗Sanders Ⅱ型跟骨骨折的有限元研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 65-70.
[13]	吴研飞, 马剑雄, 卢斌, 王颖, 柏豪豪, 靳洪震, 马信龙. CT后处理技术重建CT值与终板抗压强度的相关性研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 71-76.
[14]	庄万强, 唐毅, 骆勇刚, 张辉. 关节镜联合胫骨高位截骨术对髌骨位置及髌股关节功能影响的早中期回顾性研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 77-82.
[15]	罗鹰, 窦伟誉, 吴小杭, 陈璟昆, 彭昌贵, 潘剑英 . 微创海马钢板内固定治疗跟骨骨折并发症的影响因素[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 83-88.