寰枢椎后方结构解剖学研究及临床意义

潘保顺, 陈金水, 方镇, 高明杰

中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6) : 633-638.

PDF(2881 KB)
PDF(2881 KB)
中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6) : 633-638. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2022.6.01
应用解剖

寰枢椎后方结构解剖学研究及临床意义

  • 潘保顺1,2,    陈金水2,3*,    方镇1,    高明杰1
作者信息 +

Anatomical study and clinical significance of posterior atlantoaxial structure 

  • Pan Baoshun1,2, Chen Jinshui2*, Fang Zhen1, Gao Mingjie
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的    测量寰枢椎后方结构相关数据,为设计寰枢椎后路内固定系统提供解剖学依据。  方法    测量30例寰椎和枢椎骨标本、50例男性和50例女性CT寰枢椎后方结构相关数据,分别比较骨标本、CT图像测量指标的侧别及性别统计学差异,比较骨标本数据和CT数据统计学差异。  结果   骨标本测得后中线处高(10.75±1.38)mm、厚(8.55±1.77)mm,内、外侧后中线到两侧椎动脉沟内侧缘距离分别为(13.45±0.73)mm、(20.28±2.20)mm,内、外侧缘后弓夹角分别为(141.00±3.43)°、(134.67±2.87)°。CT测量后中线处高(10.45±1.61)mm、厚(8.12±1.57)mm,内、外侧后中线到两侧椎动脉沟内侧缘距离分别为(13.60±1.26)mm、(20.48±2.05)mm,内、外侧缘后弓夹角分别为(141.23±9.64)°、(135.47±9.02)°,后弓外侧缘半径(26.77±2.14)mm,枢椎板斜率(58.34±7.60)°,寰椎后弓下缘至枢椎棘突上缘高(19.07±2.73)mm,寰枢椎后间隙高(6.83±2.01)mm。CT数据大部分性别差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。骨标本和CT数据左右侧差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。骨标本与CT数据差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。  结论    寰枢椎后方骨性结构解剖特征较为固定;CT能较好地反映该特征;本研究可为寰枢椎后路内固定系统设计提供解剖学依据。

Abstract

Objective    To measure the anatomical parameters of posterior atlantoaxial structure, so as to provide anatomic basis for the design of posterior atlantoaxial internal fixation system.   Methods   The anatomical parameters of 30 atlantoaxial vertebra specimens, CT posterior structures of atlantoaxial vertebra of 50 males and 50 females were measured. The CT data of different genders, bone and CT measurements on the left and right side, and bone and CT measurements were compared for statistical significance.   Results   The height and thickness of the posterior midline of the bone specimens were (10.75±1.38) mm and (8.55±1.77) mm, and the distances from the medial edge of the vertebral artery sulci on both sides to the posterior midline of the bone specimens were (13.45±0.73) mm and (20.28±2.20) mm, respectively. The posterior arch angles of the inner and outer edges were (141.00±3.43) ° and (134.67±2.87) °, respectively. The height and thickness of the posterior midline measured by CT were (10.45±1.61) mm and (8.12±1.57) mm, and the distances between the inner and outer posterior midline and the medial edge of the vertebral artery sulci by CT measurement were (13.60±1.26) mm and (20.48±2.05) mm, respectively. The angle of posterior arch of the inner and outer edges by CT measurement were (141.23±9.64) ° and (135.47±9.02) °, respectively, the radius of the outer edge of posterior arch was (26.77±2.14) mm, the slope rate of the vertebral lamina of the axial vertebra was (58.34±7.60) °. The height from the lower edge of the posterior arch of the atlas to the upper edge of the spinous process of the axial vertebra was (19.07±2.73) mm. The height of posterior atlantoaxial space was (6.83±2.01) mm.  There were statistical differences in most of gender in CT data (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in bone specimens and CT data on the left and right sides (P>0.05). There was no significant difference between bone specimens and CT data (P>0.05).  Conclusions  The anatomical characteristics of posterior atlantoaxial bone structure is relatively fixed. CT can better reflect the characteristics. This study can provide anatomical basis for the design of the posterior atlantoaxial internal fixation system.

关键词

寰椎;  /   / 枢椎;  /   / 解剖学;  /   / 影像学;  /   / 测量;  /   / CT

Key words

Atlas;  /   /  Axis;  /   /  Anatomy;  /   / Imaging;  /   /  Measurement;  /   / CT

引用本文

导出引用
潘保顺, 陈金水, 方镇, 高明杰. 寰枢椎后方结构解剖学研究及临床意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志. 2022, 40(6): 633-638 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2022.6.01
Pan Baoshun, Chen Jinshui, Fang Zhen, Gao Mingjie. Anatomical study and clinical significance of posterior atlantoaxial structure [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy. 2022, 40(6): 633-638 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2022.6.01
中图分类号: R323.1    

参考文献

[1]  Rajinda P, Towiwat S, Chirappapha P. Comparison of outcomes after atlantoaxial fusion with C1 lateral mass-C2 pedicle screws and C1-C2 transarticular screws[J]. Eur Spine J, 2017, 26(4): 1064-1072. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-016-4829-1.
[2] Huang DG, Hao DJ, He BR, et al. Posterior atlantoaxial fixation: a review of all techniques[J]. Spine J, 2015, 15(10): 2271-2281. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.07.008.
[3] Liu C, Kamara A, Yan Y. Biomechanical study of C1 posterior arch crossing screw and C2 lamina screw fixations for atlantoaxial joint instability[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2020, 15(1): 156. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-01609-6.
[4]  Larsen AMG, Grannan BL, Koffie RM, et al. Atlantoaxial fusion using C1 sublaminar cables and C2 translaminar screws[J]. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown), 2018, 14(6): 647-653. DOI: 10.1093/ons/opx164.
[5] Zhang Y, Li C, Li L, et al. Design a novel integrated screw for minimally invasive atlantoaxial anterior transarticular screw fixation: a finite element analysis[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2020, 15(1): 244. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-01764-w.
[6] Kelly BP, Glaser JA, DiAngelo DJ. Biomechanical comparison of a novel C1 posterior locking plate with the harms technique in a C1-C2 fixation model[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2008, 33(24): E920-E925. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318185943d.
[7]  王宾宾, 马向阳, 杨进城, 等. 成人寰椎后弓解剖学研究及内固定钉板系统设计[J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2018, 24(4): 336-341. DOI: 10.13795/j.cnki.sgkz.2018.04.012.
[8]  Natsis K, Piperaki E T, Fratzoglou M, et al. Atlas posterior arch and vertebral artery's groove variants: a classification, morphometric study, clinical and surgical implications[J]. Surg Radiol Anat, 2019, 41(9): 985-1001. DOI: 10.1007/s00276-019-02256-1.
[9]  Jin GX, Wang H, Li L, et al. C1 posterior arch crossing screw fixation for atlantoaxial joint instability[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2013, 38(22): E1397-E1404. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a40869.
[10]Christensen DM, Eastlack RK, Lynch JJ, et al. C1 anatomy and dimensions relative to lateral mass screw placement[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2007. 32(8): 844-848. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000259833.02179.c0.
[11] 王宾宾, 马向阳, 段明阳, 等. 成人寰椎后弓部分结构测量及意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2017,35(6): 610-614. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn. 1001-165x.2017.06.003.
[12] 周凤金, 倪斌, 谢宁, 等. 个体化后路寰枢椎融合内固定治疗寰枢椎不稳[J]. 脊柱外科杂志, 2014, 12(3): 143-146. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2957.2014.03.004.
[13] Goel A, Kulkarni AG, Sharma P. Reduction of fixed atlantoaxial dislocation in 24 cases: technical note[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2005, 2(4): 505-509. DOI: 10.3171/spi.2005.2.4.0505.
[14] 邹小宝, 马向阳, 杨浩志, 等. 新型后路寰枢椎板间融合器生物力学特征的有限元分析[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2019, 23(28): 4529-4534. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.1340.
[15] 邹小宝, 马向阳, 王宾宾, 等. CT测量成人寰枢椎后方部分结构数据设计寰枢椎板间融合器[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2020, 24(36): 5837-5842. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2933.
[16] Ryu JI, Bak KH, Yi HJ, et al. Evaluation of the efficacy of titanium mesh cages with posterior C1 lateral mass and C2 pedicle screw fixation in patients with atlantoaxial instability[J]. World Neurosurg, 2016, 90: 103-108. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.02.087.
[17] Guo X, Ni B, Zhao W, et al. Biomechanical assessment of bilateral C1 laminar hook and C1-2 transarticular screws and bone graft for atlantoaxial instability[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2009, 22(8): 578-585. DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31818da3fe.
[18] Floyd T, Grob D. Translaminar screws in the atlas[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2000, 25(22): 2913-2915. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200011150-00013.

基金

国家自然科学基金(81301602);福建省自然科学基金(2016J01581);福建省科技计划引导项目(2020Y0077);蚌埠医学院自然科学基金(2020byzd380)

PDF(2881 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/