微创Juvara联合Akin截骨术治疗重度母外翻的临床疗效研究

沈国栋, 邹运璇, 张宏宁, 杨康勇, 赖志斌, 朱永展

中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1) : 89-92.

PDF(1797 KB)
PDF(1797 KB)
中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1) : 89-92. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2022.1.18
临床研究

微创Juvara联合Akin截骨术治疗重度母外翻的临床疗效研究

  • 沈国栋, 邹运璇, 张宏宁, 杨康勇, 赖志斌, 朱永展*
作者信息 +

Clinical efficacy of minimally Juvara combined with Akin osteotomy on severe hallux valgus

  • Shen Guodong, Zou Yunxuan, Zhang Hongning, Yang Kangyong, Lai Zhibin, Zhu Yongzhan*
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的    探讨微创Juvara联合Akin截骨术治疗重度母外翻的临床疗效。  方法 选取2016年8月~ 2018年8月佛山市中医院骨八科治疗的重度母外翻患者45例(50足),均采用微创Juvara联合Akin截骨术。术前、术后3个月、6个月、12个月均通过X线片测量母外翻角、跖骨间角、跖骨远端关节角、跖趾关节远端固定角、趾骨间角,参照美国足踝外科协会(AOFAS)评分和Olerud-Molander主观功能(OMA)评分标准进行测评。  结果 45例患者术后均获随访,随访时间12 ~ 17个月,平均(14.20 ± 1.55)个月,无复发病例。上述指标及评分方面,术前与术后3个月、6个月、12个月相比,差异均具有显著性意义(P<0.01);术后3个月、6个月和12个月两两比较,差异均无显著性意义(P>0.01)。  结论    微创Juvara联合Akin截骨术治疗重度母外翻疗效确切,手术切口小,安全性高,值得临床推广应用。

Abstract

Objective To study the clinical efficacy of minimally Juvara combined with Akin osteotomy on severe hallux valgus. Methods Forty-five patients (50 feet) with severe hallux valgus treated by minimally Juvara combined with Akin osteotomy in Eight Department of Orthopaedics, Foshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from August 2016 to August 2018 were collected in this study. Hallux valgus Angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), distal metatarsal angle (DMAA), distal metatarsophalangeal angle (DASA), interphalangeal angle (IPA) were measured by X-ray examination preoperatively and 3, 6 and 12 months after operation. The efficacy was evaluated in accordance with the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score and the Olerud-Molander Ankle (OMA) Score. Results All patients were followed up within 12~17 months (mean, 14.20±1.55 months). There was no recurrence during follow-up period. In terms of HVA, IMA, DMAA, DASA, IPA, AOFAS and OMA, there were significant differences in postoperative 3, 6 and 12 months and before operation (P<0.01). There were no significant differences among before operation and 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively (P>0.01). Conclusions For severe hallux valgus, minimally Juvara combined with Akin osteotomy can effectively correct the hallux valgus deformity with small surgical incision, high safety and curative effect, which is worthy of popularization and application in clinical.

关键词

重度母外翻 /  Juvara截骨术 /  Akin截骨术 /  微创治疗

Key words

  / Severe hallux valgus /  Juvara osteotomy /  Akin osteotomy /  Minimal incision treatment

引用本文

导出引用
沈国栋, 邹运璇, 张宏宁, 杨康勇, 赖志斌, 朱永展. 微创Juvara联合Akin截骨术治疗重度母外翻的临床疗效研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志. 2022, 40(1): 89-92 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2022.1.18
Shen Guodong, Zou Yunxuan, Zhang Hongning, Yang Kangyong, Lai Zhibin, Zhu Yongzhan. Clinical efficacy of minimally Juvara combined with Akin osteotomy on severe hallux valgus[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy. 2022, 40(1): 89-92 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2022.1.18
中图分类号: R687.31   

参考文献

[1]  郭娟, 钱丽霞, 王晓东. MRI评价母外翻畸形: 母 趾跖趾关节结构及位置的改变[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2019, 23(24): 3857-3861. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.1296.
[2] Yang J, Wang J, Liang X, et al. Relationship between genetic polymorphisms of the gene and hallux valgus susceptibility[J]. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers, 2019, 23(6): 380-386. DOI: 10.1089/gtmb.2018.0269.
[3] Hannan MT, Menz HB, Jordan JM, et al. High heritability of hallux valgus and lesser toe deformities in adult men and women[J]. Arthritis Care Res(Hoboken), 2013, 65(9): 1515-1521. DOI: 10.1002/acr.22040.
[4] Hsu YH, Liu YF, Hannan MT, et al. Genome-wide association meta-analyses to identify common genetic variants associated with hallux valgus in Caucasian and African Americans[J]. J Med Genet, 2015, 52(11): 762-769. DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2015-103142.
[5] Doty JF, Harris WT. Hallux valgus deformity and treatment: a three-dimensional approach[J]. Foot Ankle Clin, 2018, 23(2): 271-280. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcl.2018.01.007.
[6]  Welck MJ, Al-Khudairi N. Imaging of hallux valgus: how to approach the deformity[J]. Foot Ankle Clin, 2018, 23(2): 183-192. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcl.2018.01.002.
[7]  石凯, 刘志刚. “跖袖”的解剖学特点及临床意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志,2007, 25(3): 266-268, 271. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x. 2007. 03.010.
[8]  陈大伟, 李兵, 俞光荣. 第1跖趾关节相关生物力学研究进展[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2009, 27(3): 366-368. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2009.03.036.
[9] Zeidan H, Ryo E, Suzuki Y, et al. Detailed analysis of the transverse arch of hallux valgus feet with and without pain using weight bearing ultrasound imaging and precise force sensors[J]. PloS One, 2020, 15(1): e0226914. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226914.
[10]Mann RA. Distal soft tissue procedure and proximal metatarsal osteotomy for correction of hallux valgus deformity[J]. Orthopedics, 1990, 13(9): 1013-1018. DOI:10.3928/0147-7447-19900901-14.
[11]中华医学会骨科学分会足踝外科学组, 中国医师协会骨科医师分会足踝外科专业委员会. 拇外翻诊疗专家共识[J]. 中国医学前沿杂志(电子版), 2017, 9(10): 30-42. DOI: 10.12037/YXQY.2017.10-06.
[12]Kaufmann G, Hofer P, Braito M, et al. Effect of Akin osteotomy on hallux valgus correction after scarf osteotomy with hallux valgus interphalangeus[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2019, 40(10): 1182-1188. DOI: 10.1177/1071100719855043.
[13]Nguyen JK, Sullivan M, Alpuerto BB, et al. A radiographic analysis of the abnormal hallux interphalangeus angle range: considerations for surgeons performing Akin osteotomies[J]. J Orthop Surg(Hong Kong), 2019, 27(2): 2309499019841093. DOI: 10.1177/2309499019841093.
[14]Kaufmann G, Hofmann M, Ulmer H, et al. Outcomes after scarf osteotomy with and without Akin osteotomy a retrospective comparative study[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2019, 14(1): 193. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-019-1241-7.
[15]Rajeev A, Tumia N. Three-year follow-up results of combined short scarf osteotomy with Akin procedure for hallux valgus[J]. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2019, 58(5): 837-841. DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.12.016.
[16]Min JJ, Kwon SS, Sung KH, et al. Progression of planovalgus deformity in patients with cerebral palsy[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2020, 21(1): 141. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-3149-0.
                                                                              (下转第97页)
(上接第92页)
[17]Smyth NA, Aiyer AA. Introduction: why are there so many different surgeries for hallux valgus[J]? Foot Ankle Clinics, 2018, 23(2): 171-182. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcl.2018.01.001.
[18]Al-Nammari SS, Christofi T, Clark C. Double first metatarsal and Akin osteotomy for severe hallux valgus[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2015, 36(10): 1215-1222. DOI: 10.1177/1071100715589173.
[19]Loison M. Note sur le traitment chirurgical de hallux valgus d’apresl’etude radiographique de la deformation[J]. Bull Mem Soc Chir, 1901, 27: 528.
[20]Balacescu J. Un caz de hallux balgus simetric[J]. Rev Cir, 1903, 7: 128.
[21]陈及非, 龙作林, 刘栋, 等. 第一跖骨基底部闭合楔形截骨结合锁定钢板治疗中重度母外翻[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2017, 25(7): 616-620. DOI: 10.3977/j.issn.1005-8478.2017.07.08.
[22]Li C, Lu L, Zhang Y, et al. F-shaped osteotomy combined with basal opening wedge osteotomy for severe hallux valgus[J]. Orthop Surg, 2019, 11(4): 604-612. DOI: 10.1111/os.12505.
[23]Wagner E, Ortiz C, Wagner P. Using the center of rotation of angulation concept in hallux valgus correction: why do we choose the proximal oblique sliding closing wedge osteotomy[J]? Foot Ankle Clin, 2018, 23(2): 247-256. DOI: 10.1016/j.fcl.2018.01.005.
[24]毛威, 张建中, 孙超, 等. 基底楔形闭合截骨治疗MU外翻的几何学特征[J].中国组织工程研究, 2018, 22(7): 1056-1065. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.0117.
[25]董颖. 温氏微创截骨手法整复术治疗重度MU外翻回顾性研究[D]. 北京: 北京中医药大学, 2012.

PDF(1797 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/