颈椎单开门微型钢板固定在颈椎侧块置钉方法改进的解剖研究

吴洁石, 薛骏, 袁凤来, 赵鹏, 赵全明, 徐瑞生

中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5) : 503-506.

PDF(1537 KB)
PDF(1537 KB)
中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5) : 503-506. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2021.05.001
应用解剖

颈椎单开门微型钢板固定在颈椎侧块置钉方法改进的解剖研究

  • 吴洁石1, 薛骏1, 袁凤来1, 赵鹏2, 赵全明1, 徐瑞生
作者信息 +

An anatomical study of the improved screw placement in the mini-plate fixation of lateral mass for cervical open-door laminoplasty operation

  • Wu Jieshi1, Xue Jun1, Yuan Fenglai1, Zhao Peng2, Zhao Quanming1, Xu Ruisheng1
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 为颈椎单开门手术中微型钢板侧块固定螺钉更为安全的钉道和置钉方向提供解剖学基础。  方法 选取50套C3~7椎骨标本,确定微型钢板固定侧块时上、下两枚螺钉在颈椎侧块上的进钉点A和B,测量垂直颈椎侧块表面进钉的钉道长度A1和B1,以及头倾15°进钉的钉道长度A2和B2。  结果 A1的平均值C3(9.4±1.2)mm、C4 (11.7±2.8) mm、C5(12.9±2.5)mm、C6(12.0±2.3)mm、C7(10.4±1.8)mm;A2的平均值C3(11.9±1.6)mm、C4(15.3±1.7)mm、C5 (15.7±1.7) mm、C6 (14.2±1.3) mm、C7 (13.5±1.0) mm均大于11 mm; B1的平均值C3(4.7±0.6) mm、C4(5.0±1.1)mm、C5(5.8±0.9) mm、C6(5.5±0.6)mm、C7(5.3±0.4)mm,钉道长度<5 mm的占比分别为57%、46%、28%、27%和35%。B2的平均值C3 (6.8±0.8) mm、C4 (7.0±2.1) mm、C5 (7.8±1.4) mm、C6 (8.5±0.8) mm、C7 (7.6±0.6) mm均大于5 mm。  结论 微型钢板颈椎侧块固定时,为避免螺钉尖端穿出颈椎侧块前方,宜按头倾15°建立钉道,头端一枚可选择长度9 mm的螺钉、尾端一枚宜选择长度5 mm的螺钉,头倾15°建立钉道可以增加钉道的长度并避免螺钉尖端突破侧块前方而破坏小关节的关节面。

Abstract

Objective To provide the anatomical basis for a safer screw direction and screw path for cervical microplate side mass fixation screws in cervical open-door laminoplasty operation. Methods The points of A and B on the surface of lateral mass for setting cephalic and caudal screws to fix the plate were determined in 50 specimens of C3~C7 vertebra, the length of vertical screw path A1 and B1 and head tilt of 15o A2 and B2 were measured. Results The mean value of A1 length in cervical vertebra was C3 (9.4±1.2) mm, C4 (11.7±2.8) mm, C5 (12.9±2.5) mm, C6 (12.0±2.3) mm, C7 (10.4±1.8) mm. The mean value of A2 length was C3 (11.9±1.6) mm, C4 (15.3±1.7) mm, C5 (15.7±1.7) mm, C6 (14.2±1.3) mm and C7 (13.5±1.0) mm, which were all greater than 11 mm. The mean value of B1 length was C3 (4.7±0.6) mm, C4 (5.0±1.1) mm, C5 (5.8±0.9) mm, C6 (5.5±0.6) mm, and C7 (5.3±0.4) mm. The percentage of B1 length less than 5 mm in the C3, C4, C5, C6 and C7 vertebrae was 57%, 46%, 28%, 27% and 35%, respectively. The average length of B2 nail track in all cervical vertebrae specimens C3  was (6.8±0.8) mm, C4 (7.0±2.1) mm, C5 (7.8±1.4) mm, C6 (8.5±0.8) mm, and C7 (7.6±0.6) mm, which was greater than 5 mm. Conclusions When the cervical mini-plate is fixed to the lateral mass of cervical spine, in order to avoid screw's over length, it is necessary to set the screw path at the head tilt of 15o. The length of the cephalic screw can be 9 mm, and the caudal one should be 5 mm, which can efficiently avoid screw protruding out facet and hurting the articular cartilage of the cervical spine small joint.

关键词

颈椎病 /  颈椎 /  椎管扩大术 /  脊髓减压术 /  骨钉 /  颈痛

Key words

颈椎病 /  颈椎 /  椎管扩大术 /  脊髓减压术 /  骨钉 /  颈痛

引用本文

导出引用
吴洁石, 薛骏, 袁凤来, 赵鹏, 赵全明, 徐瑞生. 颈椎单开门微型钢板固定在颈椎侧块置钉方法改进的解剖研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志. 2021, 39(5): 503-506 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2021.05.001
Wu Jieshi, Xue Jun, Yuan Fenglai, Zhao Peng, Zhao Quanming, Xu Ruisheng. An anatomical study of the improved screw placement in the mini-plate fixation of lateral mass for cervical open-door laminoplasty operation[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy. 2021, 39(5): 503-506 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2021.05.001
中图分类号: R323.1   

参考文献

[1]  Chiba K, Ogawa Y, Ishii K, et al. Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy: average 14-year follow-up study[J]. Spine, 2006,31(26):2998-3005. DOI:10.1097/01.brs.000025 0307.78987.6b.
[2] Mayer M, Meier O, Auffarth A, et al. Cervical laminectomy and instrumented lateral mass fusion: techniques, pearls and pitfalls [J]. Eur Spine J, 2015, 24(Suppl 2): 168-185. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-2838-x.
[3] Ogawa Y, Toyama Y, Chiba K, et al. Long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2004, 1(2):168-174. DOI: 10.3171/spi.2004.1.2.0168.
[4]  幸嵘,孔清泉. 颈椎后路椎管扩大成形术后并发症的研究进展[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志,2012, 26(3): 284-288. DOI: CNKI:51-1372/R.20120229.0859.006.
[5]  曾云, 熊敏, 余化龙, 等. 微型钢板与锚定法在单开门颈椎管扩大成形术中应用的对比研究[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志,2011, 25(8): 946-950. DOI: CNKI:51-1372/R.20110708.0934.016.
[6]  Yi S, Rim DC, Nam KS, et al. Biomechanical comparison of cervical fixation via transarticular facet screws without rods versus lateral mass screws with rods [J]. World Neurosurg. 2015, 83(4): 548-552. DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2014.12.008.
[7]  潘胜发, 孙宇, 朱振军, 等. 单开门颈椎管扩大椎扳成形术后轴性症状与颈椎稳定性的相关观察[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志,  2003, 13(10): 604-607. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-406X.2003.10.008.
[8]  李雷, 王欢, 崔少千, 等. 重建后方韧带复合体的颈椎单开门桥式植骨椎板成形术对术后轴性症状和颈椎曲度的影响[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2007, 21(5): 457-460. DOI: CNKI:SUN:ZXCW.0.2007-05-006
[9] Chen H C, Chang M C, Yu W K, et al. Lateral mass anchoring screws for cervical laminoplasty preliminary report of a novel technique [J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2008, 21(6):387-392. DOI: 10.1097/BSD. 0b013e 318157c699.
[10] Lee JY, Hanks SE, Oxner W, et al. Use of small anchors in cervical laminoplasty to maintain canal expansion: a technical note [J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2007, 20(1): 33 - 35. DOI: 10.1097/01.bsd. 0000211229. 81930.80. 
[11] 陈华,刘浩,李涛,等. 微型钢板侧块螺钉穿透小关节面对颈椎单开门术后轴性症状的影响[J]. 中国修复重建杂志,2013,  27(11):1318-1324. DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.20130289.
[12] Kurd MF, Millhouse PW, Schroeder GD, et al. Lateral Mass Fixation in the Subaxial Cervical Spine [J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2015, 28(7): 259-263. DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000302.
[13] Al Barbarawi MM, Allouh MZ. Cervical lateral mass screw-rod fixation: Surgical experience with 2500 consecutive screws, an analytical review, and long-term outcomes [J]. Br J Neurosurg, 2015, 29(5): 699-704. DOI: 10.3109/02688697.2015.1026798.
[14] Johnston TL, Karaikovic EE, Lautenschlager EP, et al. Cervical pedicle screws vs. lateral mass screws: uniplanar fatigue analysis and residual pullout strengths [J].Spine J. 2006, 6(6): 667-672. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.03.019.
[15] 章庆军,罗卓荆,李明全. 颈椎侧块的应用解剖及其在后路钢板螺钉内固定术中的意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志,2003, 21(1): 19-21. DOI: CNKI:SUN:ZLJZ.0.2003-01-007.
[16] Nishinome M; Iizuka H; Iizuka Y; et al. Anatomy of subaxial cervical foramens: the safety zone for lateral mass screwing[J].Eur Spine J.2012,21(2):309-313. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-1984-2.
[17]吉立新,宋祥平,黄海,等. 颈椎侧块的形态学测量及其在临床上的应用[J]. 中国解剖与临床,2000, 5(4): 207-208. DOI: CNKI:SUN:JPLC.0.2000-04-007.
18 Gottschalk MB, Yoon ST, Park DK, et al. Surgical training using three-dimensional simulation in placement of cervical lateral mass screws: a blinded randomized control trial [J]. Spine J, 2015, 15(1):168-175. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.08.444.
[19] Kim HS, Suk KS, Moon SH, et al. Safety evaluation of freehand lateral mass screw fixation in the subaxial cervical spine: evaluation of 1256 screws [J]. Spine, 2015, 40(1): 2-5. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000 000667.
[20] Wang LN, Wang L, Song YM, et al. Clinical and radiographic outcome of unilateral open-door laminoplasty with alternative levels centerpiece mini-plate fixation for cervical compressive myelopathy: a five-year follow-up study [J]. Int Orthop, 2016, 40(4): 1267-1274. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-016-3194-3.

基金

国家自然科学基金面上项目(81770876);无锡市“太湖人才计划”医疗卫生高端人才科研项目(2020-50)

PDF(1537 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/