新型脊柱外固定技术减少医源性脊旁肌损伤的动物模型研究

李珊, 彭文, 晏怡果, 王程, 宋西正, 李学林, 欧阳智华, 薛静波, 王文军

中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (3) : 311-318.

PDF(8364 KB)
PDF(8364 KB)
中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (3) : 311-318. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2021.03.012
实验研究

新型脊柱外固定技术减少医源性脊旁肌损伤的动物模型研究

  • 李珊1, 彭文1, 2, 晏怡果1, 王程1, 宋西正1, 李学林1
    欧阳智华1, 薛静波1, 王文军1
作者信息 +

Animal experimental study of new spinal external fixation surgery on paraspinal muscle injury

  • Li Shan1, Peng Wen1.2, Yan  Yiguo1, Wang Cheng1 ,Song Xizheng1,Li Xuelin1, Ouyang Zhihua1, Xue Jingbo1,Wang Wenjun1
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 验证新型脊柱外固定技术较开放内固定手术减少医源性脊旁肌损伤的优势。  方法 取山羊10头,随机均分为脊柱外固定手术组和开放内固定手术组制作模型。术后3月处死模型动物,对手术节段腰椎行3.0 T MRI扫描,完整解剖脊旁肌组织行准静态拉伸实验及病理学切片,分析两种手术方式对脊柱脊旁肌的影响。  结果 成功构建山羊动物模型。相较开放内固定手术组,MRI示新型脊柱外固定技术组仅在螺钉周围出现少量的肌肉损伤,准静态拉伸力学实验、组织切片染色(HE染色、Masson染色)均提示新型脊柱外固定技术组肌肉损伤较少,有统计学差异。  结论 新型脊柱外固定技术通过经皮置钉以及外置矫形固定装置改进,可减少内固定装置挤压和干扰引发的脊旁肌损伤。

Abstract

Objective To verify the advantages of spinal external fixation surgery in reducing paraspinal muscle injury. Methods Ten goats were randomly divided into a spinal external fixation surgery group and an open internal fixation surgery group. The experimental animals were sacrificed at 3 months after operation. The lumbar vertebrae of the surgical segment were scanned by 3.0T MRI, and the paraspinal muscle tissue was completely dissected for quasi-static tensile test and pathological section. The effects of the two surgical methods on paraspinal muscle were analyzed. Results The goat animal model was successfully constructed. MRI showed that compared with the open internal fixation surgery group, there were only a small amount of muscle injury around the screw in the spinal external fixation surgery group. Quasi-static tensile mechanical tests, tissue section staining (HE staining, Masson staining) all suggested that there was less muscle injury in the spinal external fixation surgery group. There are statistical differences. Conclusions The method of spinal external fixation through percutaneous nail implantation and external orthopedic fixation was verified to reduce the paraspinal muscle injury caused by postoperative internal fixation device compression and interference.

关键词

新型脊柱外固定器 /  山羊脊旁肌 /  手术损伤 /  动物实验

Key words

New spinal external fixator /  Goat paraspinal muscle /  Surgical injury /  Animal experiment

引用本文

导出引用
李珊, 彭文, 晏怡果, 王程, 宋西正, 李学林, 欧阳智华, 薛静波, 王文军. 新型脊柱外固定技术减少医源性脊旁肌损伤的动物模型研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志. 2021, 39(3): 311-318 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2021.03.012
Li Shan, Peng Wen, Yan Yiguo, Wang Cheng, Song Xizheng, Li Xuelin, Ouyang Zhihua, Xue Jingbo, Wang Wenjun. Animal experimental study of new spinal external fixation surgery on paraspinal muscle injury[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy. 2021, 39(3): 311-318 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2021.03.012
中图分类号: R95-33    R649.9    

参考文献

[1]  管礼安, 谭永超, 成业东. 胸腰椎骨折分型及开放性手术治疗的研究进展[J]. 颈腰痛杂志, 2016, 37(4): 336-339. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-7234.2016.04.004.
[2] Magerl FP. Stabilization of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine with external skeletal fixation[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1984, (189): 125-141. PMID: 6478690.
[3] Olerud S, Sjöström L, Karlström G, et al . Spontaneous effect of increased stability of the lower lumbar spine in cases of severe chronic back pain. The answer of an external transpeduncular fixation test[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1986, (203): 67-74. PMID: 2937596.
[4]  金正帅, 王道新, 范卫民, 等. 脊柱外固定复位器在胸腰椎骨折的应用[J]. 江苏医药, 2005, 31(2): 102-104, 76. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-3685.2005.02.008.
[5]  徐又佳, 郑祖根, 王以进, 等. 经椎弓根外固定器的设计和生物力学分析[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 1994, 4(4): 152-156.
[6]  王文军, 宋西正, 王麓山, 等. 脊柱外固定器联合内窥镜技术治疗胸腰椎爆裂骨折[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2008, 18(10): 741-746. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-406X.2008.10.005.
[7]  宋西正, 康禹, 王程,等. 脊柱外固定动静结合治疗胸腰椎骨折的临床研究[J]. 中国中医骨伤科杂志, 2018, 26(12): 13-17.
[8]  刘洪, 王文军, 宋西正, 等. 新型脊柱外固定器的研制和生物力学测试[J]. 医学临床研究, 2006, 23(2): 148-150. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-7171.2006.02.002.
[9]  高万军. 微创椎弓根钉内固定在胸腰椎创伤性骨折治疗中的应用效果评价[J]. 当代医学, 2020, 26(2): 131-132. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4393.2020.02.055.
[10] 宋西正, 汪向东, 王文军, 等. 脊柱外固定器的研制及其在胸腰椎骨折微创治疗中的临床应用[J]. 中国骨伤, 2008, 21(9): 698-699. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.yyyy.nn.zzz.
[11]史亚民, 侯树勋, 韦兴, 等. 腰椎后路手术早期并发症的防治[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2004, 24(9): 34-37. DOI: 10.3760/j.issn:0253-2352. 2004. 09. 008.
[12]刘国民, 孔宁, 韩宏志, 等. 鹿、羊和人腰椎生物学参数的比较及其意义[J]. 吉林大学学报(医学版), 2012, 38(6): 1096-1100, 1252.
[13]郑学天, 薛京浩, 崔成哲, 等. 眠乃宁(鹿眠宁)对141头次黑熊的麻醉试验[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2004, (3): 44-45. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7034.2004.03.028.
[14]甘胡勇, 彭广能, 胡霖, 等. 不同剂量鹿眠宝对山羊的麻醉效果观察[J]. 中国兽医杂志, 2010, 46(8): 30-32. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0529-6005.2010.08.011.
[15] 马建青, 吴占勇, 孔建军, 等. 山羊腰椎融合动物模型的围手术期管理[J]. 生物骨科材料与临床研究, 2018, 15(5): 5-7, 13. CNKI: SUN:SWGK.0.2018-05-002.
[16] 白万胜, 沙比提. 速眠新对卡拉库尔羊麻醉效果的研究[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2012, (1): 120-121. CNKI: SUN:HLJX.0.2012-01-048.
[17] 王建林, 盛文亮, 孙祥贵, 等. 马头山羊躯干肌肉解剖研究[J]. 中国养羊, 1994, (1): 17-21.
[18] 洪汛宁, 王德杭, 王小宁, 等. 肌肉损伤磁共振成像的病理基础研究[J].南京医科大学学报, 2000, 20(5): 362-364. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn. 1007-4368.2000.05.012.
[19] 王欣, 李梅, 廖志钢, 等. 尸僵再形成的实验性研究[J]. 法医学杂志, 2001, 17(4): 202-204. DOI: 1004-5619(2001)04-0202-03.
[20] 王宝珍. 肌肉类软组织动态力学性能研究[D]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学, 2010.
[21] 边蔷, 胡海威, 温建民, 等. 足部相关肌肉、肌腱组织材料弹性模量的测定[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2015, 19(12): 1919-1923. CNKI: SUN:XDKF.0.2015-12-024.
[22] 唐兆升, 梁秀龄, 陈嵘, 等. 腓骨肌萎缩症腓肠神经病理的形态计量学[J]. 中山医科大学学报, 1998, 19(3): 24-27.
[23] 李洵桦, 田伟, 马耘田, 等. 近端型脊肌萎缩症骨骼肌病理及其形态定量分析的研究[J]. 中国神经精神疾病杂志, 2000, 26(2): 105-106. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0152.2000.02.016.
[24] Bleiler C, Ponte Castañeda P, Röhrle O. A microstructurally-based, multi-scale, continuum-mechanical model for the passive behaviour of skeletal muscle tissue[J]. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2019, 97: 171-186. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.05.012.
[25] Morrow DA, Haut Donahue TL, Odegard GM, et al . Transversely isotropic tensile material properties of skeletal muscle tissue[J]. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2010, 3(1): 124-129. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2009.03.004.
[26] Silva M, Parente M, Brandão S, et al . Characterization of the passive and active material parameters of the pubovisceralis muscle using an inverse numerical method[J]. J Biomech, 2018, 71: 100-110. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.01.033.
[27] Oh HS, Kim JS, Lee SH, et al . Comparison between the accuracy of percutaneous and open pedicle screw fixations in lumbosacral fusion[J]. Spine J, 2013, 13(12): 1751-1757. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee. 2013. 03. 042.
[28] Hu ZJ, Fang XQ, Zhou ZJ, et al . Effect and possible mechanism of muscle-splitting approach on multifidus muscle injury and atrophy after posterior lumbar spine surgery[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2013, 95(24): e192(1-9). DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01607.
[29] Hu Y, Leung HB, Lu WW, et al. Histologic and electrophysiological changes of the paraspinal muscle after spinal fusion: an experimental study[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2008, 33(13): 1418-1422. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181753bea.
[30] Bresnahan L, Fessler RG, Natarajan RN. Evaluation of change in muscle activity as a result of posterior lumbar spine surgery using a dynamic modeling system[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2010, 35(16): E761-E767. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e45a6e.
[31] Mori E, Okada S, Ueta T, et al. Spinous process-splitting open pedicle screw fusion provides favorable results in patients with low back discomfort and pain compared to conventional open pedicle screw fixation over 1 year after surgery[J]. Eur Spine J, 2012, 21(4): 745-753. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-2146-2.

基金

国家自然科学基金(31570946);湖南省研究生科研创新项目资助(CX2017B568);湖南省卫生计生委科研计划课题项目资助(A2017016)

PDF(8364 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/