目的 为膝关节前交叉韧带损伤分度提供新的影像诊断依据。 方法 选取膝关节弥散张量成像扫描检查正常者100例和单侧前交叉韧带撕裂伤者100例，后者按照损伤程度分为Ⅰ~Ⅳ级，在工作站划分前交叉韧带损伤处及正常组相应部位感兴趣区，测量各向异性分数（fractional anisotropy，FA）和表观弥散系数（apparent diffusion coefficient，ADC），生成纤维示踪图像。 结果 前交叉韧带损伤处与正常组相应部位的FA和ADC差异有统计学意义，损伤处的FA低于正常组，ADC高于正常组。前交叉韧带Ⅰ级、Ⅱ级、Ⅲ级、Ⅳ级损伤处的FA和ADC差异有统计学意义，FA随损伤程度增高而逐渐降低，与损伤程度呈负相关；ADC则逐渐增高，与损伤程度呈正相关。FA和ADC、纤维示踪成像及MRI诊断前交叉韧带损伤程度分级的灵敏度、特异度、准确度、阳性预测值及阴性预测值差异均有统计学意义，从高到低均依次为纤维示踪成像、FA和ADC、MRI。 结论 膝关节前交叉韧带损伤处的FA和ADC与损伤程度密切相关，纤维示踪成像可以提高损伤程度分级的准确率，弥散张量成像可以为前交叉韧带损伤分级提供更准确的影像诊断依据。
Abstract
Objective To provide a new imaging diagnostic basis for the classification of anterior cruciate ligament injury of the knee. Methods One hundred cases of normal knee joint and one hundred cases of unilateral anterior cruciate ligament laceration were selected to perform diffusion tensor imaging scanning, the latter were divided into I grade, II grade, III grade and IV grade according to the damage degree. At the workstation, the regions of interest of the anterior cruciate ligament injury and the corresponding position of the normal group were divided, the fractional anisotropy(FA) values and apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC) values were measured, and the tractography images were generated. Results There were significant differences in the FA values and ADC values between the anterior cruciate ligament injury and the normal group. The FA values of anterior cruciate ligament injury was lower than that of the normal group, while the ADC values was higher than that of the normal group. There were significant differences in the FA values and ADC values of the anterior cruciate ligament injure at I grade, II grade, III grade and IV grade, the FA values decreased gradually with the increasing of damage degree, which was negatively correlated with the damage degree. The ADC values increased gradually, which was positively correlated with the damage degree. There were significant difference in the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the FA values and ADC values, tractography imaging and MRI in the diagnosis of degree classification of the anterior cruciate ligament injury, it was the tractography imaging, FA values and ADC values, MRI in order from high to low. Conclusions The FA values and ADC values of anterior cruciate ligament injure of knee joint are closely related to the damage degree, the tractography imaging can improve the diagnostic rate of the degree classification of anterior cruciate ligament injury, and the diffusion tensor imaging can provide a more accurate imaging diagnostic basis for degree classification of anterior cruciate ligament injury.
关键词
前交叉韧带 /
弥散张量成像 /
纤维示踪成像 /
膝关节 /
MRI
Key words
Anterior cruciate ligament /
Diffusion tensor imaging /
Tractography imaging /
/
Knee joint /
Magnetic resonance imaging
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 罗仲流, 胡勇, 高志, 等. 受伤时间及次数对前交叉韧带断裂后前外侧旋转失稳的影响[J]. 中国运动医学杂志, 2019, 38(11): 938-942. DOI: CNKI:SUN:YDYX.0.2019-11-003.
[2] 邢毓, 张卢. 前交叉韧带损伤MRI诊断与临床诊断对比[J]. 当代医学, 2018, 24(21): 157-158. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4393. 2018. 21. 064.
[3] Van DP, Vanhoenacker FM, Gielen JL, et al. Three tesla magnetic resonance imaging of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee: can we differentiate complete from partial tears[J]? Skeletal Radiol, 2011, 40(6): 701-707. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-010-1044-8.
[4] 陈立勋, 赵衡, 李劲松, 等. 健康人前交叉韧带的扩散张量成像及其与MRI的比较[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版), 2013, 38(6): 610-616. DOI: CNKI:SUN:HNYD.0.2013-06-013.
[5] Yang XF, Li M, Chen DY, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging for anatomical and quantitative evaluation of the anterior cruciate ligament and ACL grafts: a preliminary study[J]. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2014, 38(4): 489-494. DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000078.
[6] 李显, 赵力, 王淑丽, 等. 前交叉韧带损伤的关节镜与MRI诊断分级研究[J]. 中国医学前沿杂志(电子版), 2011, 3(1): 61-65. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7372.2011.01.016.
[7] 敖英芳, 崔国庆, 田得祥, 等. 运动员的前交叉韧带损伤的流行病学研究[J]. 体育科学, 2014, 34 (4): 47-48. DOI: CNKI:SUN:TYKX.0.2000-04-016.
[8] 邓亚开, 陈伟南, 何俊山, 等. 混编肌腱重建兔膝前交叉韧带关节腔内愈合的组织学研究[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2016, 24(22): 2093-2098. DOI: 10.3977/j.issn.1005-8478.2016.22.18.
[9] Hakan S, Halil A, Ozgur C, et a1. Assessment of postoperative tendon quality in patients with achilles tendon rupture using diffusion tensor imaging and tendon fiber tracking [J]. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2015, 54(5): 782-786. DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2014.12.025.
[10] 刘平, 敖英芳. 交叉韧带生物力学特点研究[J]. 中国运动医学杂志, 2015, 24(3): 326-328. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6710.2005.03.014.
[11] Cushner FD, Rosa DFL, Vigorita VJ, et a1. A quantitative histologic comparison: ACL degeneration in the osteoarthritic knee[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2003, 18(6): 687-692. DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(03)00256-0.
[12] Zeng H, Zheng JH, Zhang JE, et a1. Grading of rabbit skeletal muscle trauma by diffusion tensor imaging and tractography on magnetic resonance imaging[J]. Chin Med Sci, 2006, 21(4): 276-280. PMID: 17249205.
[13] 吴冰, 丘志河, 李盛, 等. 自体腘绳肌腱移植重建前交叉韧带后植物的组织学研究[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2018, 32 (7): 873-879. DOI: CNKI:SUN:ZXCW.0.2018-07-020.
[14] 王怀东, 张富军, 裴海波, 等. 关节镜下单束和双束重建前交叉韧带对膝关节退变及膝关节稳定性的影响研究[J]. 陕西医学杂志, 2019, 48 (5): 650-653. DOI: CNKI:SUN:SXYZ.0.2019-05-030.
[15] Van Dyck P, Froeling M, De Smet E, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging of the anterior cruciate ligament graft[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2017, 46(5): 1423-1432. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25666.
[16] Zhang Y, Wu IW, Buckley S, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging of the nigrostriatal fibers in parkinson’s disease[J]. Mov Disord, 2015, 30(9): 1229-1236. DOI: 10.1002/mds.26251.
[17] Delin C, Silvera S, Coste J, et al. Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of qualitative of diffusion-weighted MRI combined with conventional MRI in differentiating between complete and partial anterior cruciate ligament tears[J]. Eur Radiol, 2013, 23(3): 845-854. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-012-2633-9.
京ICP备08002354号-3
