弓状线在腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术中的临床解剖学观察及其临床意义

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2021.01.004

中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1) : 16-21. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2021.01.004

王友华，　黄海，　骆剑华，　张焕彬，　郑富强，　梁绍诚，　周学鲁

作者信息 +

Anatomical observation and clinical significance of the arcuate line in totally extraperitoneal preperitoneal （TEP） herniorrhaphy

Wang Youhua, Huang Hai, Luo Jianhua, Zhang Huanbin, Zheng Fuqiang, Liang Shaocheng, Zhou Xuelu

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

目的　观察弓状线的位置、形态和毗邻关系, 为腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术（TEP）提供应用解剖学资料和手术指导。方法　对60例成人原发性腹股沟疝患者TEP时解剖显露弓状线，用穿刺针从皮肤垂直刺入测量弓状线的位置和长度、观察其形态和数量。结果　60例分为经典组（脐下4~5 cm ）15例（25.0%），高位组（3 cm）1 例（1.7%），低位组（6~12 cm） 43例（71.6%）和无弓状线组1例（1.7%）。单个弓状线22例（36.7%），而多条弓状线38 例（63.3%）。直线形弓状线2例（3.3）%，弧形和逐渐变薄消失形各为28例和29例（各占46.7%和48.3%）。结论　弓状线是腹直肌鞘后层缺如所形成的弓状游离缘，其位置、形态和数量存在很大差异，弓状线变异不仅加大了TEP手术难度，而且也增加了手术并发症。弓状线在TEP手术中具有重要的临床意义。

Abstract

Objective　To study the position and morphological features of the arcuate line and get better understanding of its clinical significance, so as to provide the applied anatomical data and operation guide for the totally extraperitoneal (TEP) herniorrhaphy. Methods The arcuate line was dissected and observed during TEP in 60 cases of adult patients with primary inguinal hernia. The location and length of the arcuate line were determined by puncturing needle vertically through the skin, and its morphology and quantity data were recorded.　Results　The arcuate line was recorded and divided into four groups, namely, a classical group (4~5 cm) in 15 cases (accounting for 25.0%), a high level group (less than 3 cm) in one case (accounting for 1.7 %), a low level group (6~12 cm) in 43 cases（accounting for 71.6%）, an absent arcuate line group in one case (accounting for 1.7%). Twenty-two cases were single arcuate line (accounting for 36.7%), while 38 cases were multiple arcuate line (accounting for 63.3%). Two cases were the straight shaped arcuate line (accounting for 3.3%), 28 cases and 29 cases were the arc-shaped and the transition shaped arcuate line (accounting for 46.7% and 48.3 % respectively). Conclusions The arcuate line is the free margin formed by the absence of the posterior layer of the rectus sheath. There are great differences in its position, morphology and number. The variation of arcuate line not only increases the difficulty of the TEP surgery, but also increases the complications. The arcuate line has important clinical significance in the TEP operation.

导出引用

王友华, 黄海, 骆剑华, 张焕彬, 郑富强, 梁绍诚, 周学鲁. 弓状线在腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术中的临床解剖学观察及其临床意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志. 2021, 39(1): 16-21 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2021.01.004

Wang Youhua, Huang Hai, Luo Jianhua, Zhang Huanbin, Zheng Fuqiang, Liang Shaocheng, Zhou Xuelu. Anatomical observation and clinical significance of the arcuate line in totally extraperitoneal preperitoneal （TEP） herniorrhaphy [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy. 2021, 39(1): 16-21 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2021.01.004

中图分类号： R657.8

参考文献

[1] 周上军, 周学鲁. Kugel 补片在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中有效性和安全性的临床研究[J]. 中国现代医生, 2017, 55(24):53-56.
[2] 周学鲁, 王友华, 黄海, 等. 弓状线变异在腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术中的临床意义[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志, 2019, 13(1):39-43. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2019.01.011.
[3] 宗华, 潘凯, 陶红光, 等. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中出血控制及解剖分析[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(1):34-38. DOI:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2016.01.008.
[4] Daes J. The enhanced view–totally extraperitoneal technique for repair of inguinal hernia[J]. Surg Endosc, 2012, 26(10):1187-1189. DOI:10.1007/s00464-011- 1993-6.
[5] 刘忠诚,王守光,尹鹏,等. 解剖定位标志在腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术中的临床应用[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2018, 18(1):33-35. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn. 1009-6604.2018.01.009.
[6] Putnis S, Berney CR. Totally extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: techniques and pitfalls of a challenging procedure[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2012, 397(8):1343-1351. DOI:10.1007/s00423-012-0999-4.
[7] Ansari MM. Rectusial Fascia: A new entity of laparoscopic live surgical anatomy [J]. Open Access J Surg, 2017, 3:1-5. DOI:10.19080/OAJS.2017.03.555618.
[8] Ansari MM. Arcuate line of Douglas: Localization from surface anatomic landmarks of anterior abdomen during laparoscopic TEPP hernioplasty[J]. International J Sci and Res Pub, 2017, 7(7):575-580.
[9] 中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组. 腹股沟疝、股疝和腹壁切口疝手术治疗方案（草案）[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2001,21,(10):彩色插页. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1005-2208.2001.10.037
[10] 刘正津, 钟世镇. 腹直肌鞘的观察[J]. 解剖学报, 1965, 8(4):568-573.
[11] Rizk NN. The arcuate line of the rectus sheath-dose it exists[J]? J Anat, 1991, 175(4): 1-6. DOI:10.1002/ar.1092290416.
[12] Mwachaka PM, Saidi HS, Odula PQ, et al. Locating the arcuate line of Douglas: is it of surgical relevance[J]? Clin Anat 2010, 23(1):84-86. DOI:10.1002/ ca.20877.
[13] 马振超, 何文武, 樊中川, 等. 弓状线位置的应用解剖[J]. 四川解剖学杂志, 2008, 16(3): 18-19. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1005-1457.2008.03.006.
[14] 杜廷页, 史二栓, 石岩. 弓状线的自身比例研究[J]. 包头医学院学报, 2000, 16(4): 264-265.
[15] Ansari MM. Arcuate line variations: are they important for TEP surgeons [J]. Kuwait Med J, 2015, 47(4): 313-316.
[16] 李武, 于小平, 崔怀瑞, 等. 腹壁下动脉后鞘穿支腹膜瓣的应用解剖学研究[J].中国临床解剖学杂志, 2016, 34(1):16-20. DOI:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x. 2016.01.005.
[17] 彭鸿翔, 杨炳彦, 郭晓丹, 等. 异常闭孔动脉的形态特点及其临床意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2018, 36(1):10-13. DOI:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x. 2018. 01.003