目的 探讨经Wiltse肌间隙入路结合伤椎置钉治疗胸腰椎骨折的临床效果。 方法 纳入2015年10月至2018年10月我科收治的胸腰椎骨折患者53例,按手术入路分为Wiltse肌间隙入路组(A组,28例)和传统后正中入路组(B组,26例)。患者Frankel分级为E级,无需椎管减压和植骨融合。A组采用Wiltse肌间隙入路手术,B组采用传统后路手术治疗。观察两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、术后下地时间,视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估疼痛情况,测量伤椎体前缘高度与Cobb角,并进行比较。 结果 所有患者获得随访,时间6~18个月,平均12.5个月。手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、术后下地时间等指标A组均优于B组(P<0.05);两组患者术后3 d、术后1月的VAS评分比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组术后伤椎前缘高度、Cobb角比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论 经Wiltse肌间隙入路结合伤椎置钉治疗胸腰椎骨折,操作简单,置钉方便,可减少手术时间及出血量,对椎旁肌影响小,减轻术后腰痛程度,缩短康复时间,具有较高的临床应用价值。
Abstract
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of the Wiltse muscle gap approach combined with vertebral screw placement on treating of thoracolumbar fractures. Methods 53 patients with thoracolumbar fractures were admitted to our department from October 2015 to October 2018, which were divided into a Wiltse muscle gap approach group (group A) and a traditional posterior median group (group B) according to the surgical approach. Based on Frankel Graded to grade E, there was no need for the patients to perform the spinal decompression and bone graft fusion. 28 patients in the group A were treated with Wiltse muscle gap approach, and 26 patients in the group B were treated with conventional posterior surgery. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, postoperative ground time were observed. Visual analog scale (VAS) was used to evaluate the pain, and the height of the vertebral body leading edge and Cobb angle were measured and compared. Results All patients were followed up for 6 to 18 months, with an average of 12.5 months. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, postoperative ground time and other indicators in the group A were better than that of the group B (P<0.05). There was statistical difference in VAS scores between 3 days and 1 month after operation of the two groups (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the height and Cobb angle between the two groups. Conclusions The Wiltse muscle gap approach combined with the vertebral screw placement for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures is simple to operate and pale the screw, which can reduce the operation time, bleeding volume and the degree of postoperative low back pain, shorten the recovery time, with little effect on the paravertebral muscles and high clinical application value.
关键词
Wiltse肌间隙入路 /
胸腰椎骨折 /
伤椎置钉 /
内固定
Key words
Wiltse muscle interstitial approach /
Thoracolumbar fracture /
Injured vertebrae /
Internal fixation
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Defino HL, Canto FR. Low thoracic and lumbar bumt fractures: radiographic and functional outcomes[J]. European Spine Journal, 2007, 16(11): 1934-1943.
[2] Schwarz F, Burckhart M, McLean AL, et al. Risk factors for adjacent fractures after cement-augmented thoracolumbar pedicle screw instrumentation[J]. Int J Spine Surg, 2018, 12(5): 565-570.
[3] 张祝秋, 薛荣, 陈余庆, 等. 椎旁肌间隙入路与后正中入路对短节段胸腰椎骨折的疗效比较[J]. 南通大学学报(医学版), 2018, 38(5): 339-341.
[4] 张兆川, 马超, 吴德慧, 等. 椎弓根螺钉椎旁肌间隙与后正中入路内固定修复胸腰椎骨折: 稳定性比较[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2014, 18(40): 6451-6458.
[5] Wiltse LL, Bateman JG, Hutchinson RH, et al. The paraspinal sacrospinalins-spliting approach to the lumbar spine[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1968, 50(5): 919-926.
[6] 朱贤友, 王家胜, 吴威, 等. Wiltse肌问隙人路与后正中人路内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折的对比研究[J]. 颈腰痛杂志, 2016, 37(3): 204-206.
[7] Kumar A, Aujla R, Lee C. The management of thoraeolumbar burst fractures: a prospective study between conservative management。Traditional open spinal surgery and minimally interventional spinal surgery[J]. Springerplus, 2015, 157(5): 831-836.
[8] 黎启福, 冼海庭, 黄志锋, 等. 经椎旁肌间隙入路联合伤椎置钉技术椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折的效果分析[J]. 齐齐哈尔医学院学报, 2018, 39(7): 767-770.
[9] 李健, 王鹏, 林森. 椎旁肌间隙入路与传统入路结合伤椎置钉内固定术治疗胸腰椎椎体骨折的比较[J]. 颈腰痛杂志, 2015, 36(3): 246-248.
[10]Dick JC, Jones MP, Zdeblick TA, el a1. A biomechanical comparison evaluating the use of intermediate screws and cross-linkage in lumbar pediele fixation[J]. J Spinal Disord, 1994, 7(5): 402-407.
基金
广东省医学科学技术研究基金项目(20181162349 2670)