肩胛骨关节盂长短径解剖测量及临床意义

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2020.04.004

中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (4) : 381-384. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2020.04.004

应用解剖

肩胛骨关节盂长短径解剖测量及临床意义

任中楷^1，2，　张英泽^2，3，　汪建^1，2，　张益²，　陈进利²，　张春佳¹，　于腾波²

作者信息 +

Anatomical measurement and clinical significance of line of apsides in glenoid

REN Zhong-kai ^1,2, ZHANG Ying-ze ^2,3, WANG Jian^1,2, ZHANG Yi ²， CHEN Jin-li²,ZHANG Chun-jia^1,2,YU Teng-bo²

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

目的　通过测量肩关节盂长短径形态数据，分析数据之间相关性，指导关节盂骨缺损的预估。方法　选取青岛大学解剖室完整成对肩胛骨标本共50对（100例），进行编号后根据左右侧进行分组，分别测量关节盂长径，关节盂短径，并进行统计学分析处理。结果　100例肩胛骨标本中，各项数据平均值分别为：关节盂长径（35.46±3.29）mm，关节盂短径（26.11±3.20）mm。左右侧分组平均值：左侧关节盂长径（35.28±3.81）mm，右侧关节盂长径（35.24±3.31）mm，左侧关节盂短径（25.83±3.18）mm，右侧关节盂短径（26.38±3.23）mm，左右侧关节盂短径存在相关性（P<0.05，r=0.882，R2=0.777），线性关系式为：y（右侧关节盂短径）=2.907+0.869x（左侧关节盂短径）。关节盂长径与短径存在相关性(P<0.05, r=0.810，R2=0.657)，线性关系式为：y（关节盂短径）=-1.816+0.787x（关节盂长径）。结论　左、右侧关节盂短径间以及同侧关节盂长、短径间存在正相关性；该相关性可修正人工测量关节盂最佳拟合圆直径的误差，指导临床术前预估关节盂骨缺损范围。

Abstract

Objective　To measure the glenoid morphology of the shoulder, analyze the correlation between the data and to guide the prediction of glenoid defects.　Methods　A total of 50 pairs (100 cases) of shoulder specimens were collected from the anatomy department of Qingdao University. The specimens were divided into groups according to the left and right sides after numbering. The longitudinal diameter of the glenoid and the transverse diameter of the glenoid were measured respectively. Then the statistical analysis was conducted. Results　In the 100 scapular specimens, the mean values of the data were as followings: longitudinal diameter of the glenoid cavity was (35.46±3.29) mm and transverse diameter of the glenoid cavity was (26.11±3.20) mm, respectively. The average values of the left and right side were as followings: longitudinal diameter on the left side of the glenoid cavity was (35.28±3.81) mm; the right side was (35.24±3.31) mm, transverse diameter on the left side of the glenoid cavity was (25.83±3.18) mm, and the right side was (26.38±3.23) mm. There was a correlation between transverse diameter on the left side of the glenoid cavity and transverse diameter on the right side of the glenoid cavity (P<0.05, r=0.882, R2=0.777). The linear relation was: y (transverse diameter on the right side of glenoid cavity) = 2.907+0.869x (transverse diameter on the left side of the glenoid cavity). There was a correlation between the longitudinal and transverse diameter of the glenoid joint (P<0.05, r=0.810，R2=0.657). The linear relationship was y (transverse diameter of the glenoid joint)= -1.816+0.787x (longitudinal diameter of the glenoid joint).　Conclusions　There are positive correlations between the longitudinal diameter of the glenoid joint and the transverse diameter of the glenoid joint, between transverse diameter on the left and right side of the glenoid cavity. The correlation can reduce the error of artificial subjective measurement of the best-fit circle diameter of the glenoid cavity, and can predict the area of anterior glenoid bone loss before clinical operation and improve the prognosis.

导出引用

任中楷, 张英泽, 汪建, 张益, 陈进利, 张春佳, 于腾波. 肩胛骨关节盂长短径解剖测量及临床意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志. 2020, 38(4): 381-384 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2020.04.004

REN Zhong-kai, ZHANG Ying-ze, WANG Jian, ZHANG Yi, CHEN Jin-li, ZHANG Chun-jia, YU Teng-bo. Anatomical measurement and clinical significance of line of apsides in glenoid[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy. 2020, 38(4): 381-384 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2020.04.004

中图分类号： R322 R323.42

参考文献

[1] Wilk KE, Arrigo CA, Andrews JR. Current concepts: the stabilizing structures of the glenohumeral joint [J]. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 1997, 25(6): 364-379.
[2] VandenBerghe G, Hoenecke HR, Fronek J. Glenohumeral joint instability: the orthopedic approach [J]. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol, 2005, 9(1): 34-43.
[3] Mohammed H, Skalski MR, Patel DB, et al. Coracoid Process: The lghthouse of the shoulder [J]. Radiographics, 2016, 36(7): 2084-2101.
[4] Klemt C, Toderita D, Nolte D, et al. The critical size of a defect in the glenoid causing anterior instability of the shoulder after a Bankart repair, under physiological joint loading [J]. Bone Joint J, 2019, 101-B(1): 68-74.
[5] Burkhart SS, Debeer JF, Tehrany AM, et al. Quantifying glenoid bone loss arthroscopically in shoulder instability [J]. Arthroscopy, 2002, 18(5): 488-491.
[6] Kralinger F, Aigner F, Longato S, et al. Is the bare spot a consistent landmark for shoulder arthroscopy? A study of 20 embalmed glenoids with 3-dimensional computed tomographic reconstruction [J]. Arthroscopy, 2006, 22(4): 428-432.
[7] 李成, 董启榕, 范志海,等. 定量评估肩盂骨质缺损的解剖及三维CT研究 [J]. 江苏医药, 2014, 40(18): 2167-2169，2241.
[8] Chuang TY, Adams CR, Burkhart SS. Use of preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography to quantify glenoid bone loss in shoulder instability [J]. Arthroscopy 2008, 24(4): 376-382.
[9] Delage Royle A, Balg F, Bouliane MJ, et al. Indication for computed tomography scan in shoulder instability: sensitivity and specificity of standard radiographs to predict bone defects after traumatic anterior glenohumeral instability [J]. Orthop J Sports Med, 2017, 5(10): 2325967117733660.
[10]Sugaya H, Moriishi J, Dohi M, et al. Glenoid rim morphology in recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability [J]. J Bone Joint Surg, 2003, 85(5): 878-884.
[11] 赵宇晴, 袁慧书. 基于肩关节骨性关节盂后下部最大拟合圆采用径线缺损比例法评价关节盂形态的可靠性研究 [J]. 中国运动医学杂志, 2019, 38(2): 99-103.