目的 比较3D打印截骨导板辅助全膝关节置换（total knee arthroplasty，TKA）与传统手术方式行TKA的临床效果差异，探讨应用3D打印个性化截骨技术在TKA中的临床应用价值。 方法 将2015年10月~2018年6月间行TKA的120例（136膝）患者，随机分成3D组和传统组，3D组60例（70膝）采用3D打印截骨导板辅助膝关节置换手术，传统组60例（66膝）采用传统的膝关节置换方法。术前两组患者年龄、性别、KSS（knee society score）评分，均无统计学差异（P>0.05）。记录手术时间，术中实际股骨远端、胫骨近端截骨量，术后X线片测量平均股骨、胫骨机械轴夹角（MFTA），矢状位胫骨平台后倾角（STCA），并进行统计学分析，末次随访时行KSS评分。 结果 术后随访9~32个月，两组病例均未出现关节感染，假体松动、移位、下沉等并发症。3D导板组术前规划的股骨远端、胫骨近端截骨量与手术实际无统计学差异（P>0.05）；3D导板组的手术时间、MFTA值、STCA值与传统组相比差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）；末次随访3D导板组KSS临床及功能评分均高于传统组，两组间差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。 结论 3D打印个性化截骨技术简化了TKA手术步骤，可提高手术的精准度与临床疗效，值得进一步推广应用。
Abstract
Objective To compare the differences of clinical efficacy between 3D printing technology surgical method and conventional surgical method in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and to investigate the application of 3D printing osteotomy technique assisted TKA in the treatment of knee arthropathy. Methods From October 2015 to June 2018, 136 knees of 120 patients with TKA were randomly divided into two groups, a 3D group and a conventional group. The 60 patients in the 3D group (70 knees) used 3D printing osteotomy guide plate to assist the TKA operation. The 60 patients (66 knees) in the conventional group adopted the traditional TKA method over the same period. There were no significant differences in age, gender and knee society score grade among two groups before operation (P>0.05). Operation time, the actual distal femur and the osteotomy data of proximal tibia during operation were recorded. The mechanical femur tibia angle (MFTA), the sagittal tibia plateau caster angle (STCA) of two groups after operation were measured by X-ray and were analyzed statistically, and the knee society score (KSS) was recorded and compared between the two groups at the end of the follow-ups. Results All patients were followed up for 9~32 months, no infection, prosthesis loosening or motion was observed in two groups. No significant differences in the distal femur and the osteotomy data of proximal tibia were found between the planned value in 3D group and the actual value in the operation (P＞0.05). There were statistical significances in operation time, MFTA value and STCA value between 3D group and conventional group (P<0.05). The 3D group had better clinical and functional grade in KSS than the conventional group during the last follow-ups. and there were statistical significances (P＜0.05). Conclusion The 3D printing technique can simplify the operation procedure, improve the surgical accuracy and the clinical efficacy, making it worthy of further promotion.
关键词
膝关节 /
置换 /
3D打印 /
截骨 /
个性化
Key words
Knee-joint /
Arthroplasty /
3D printing /
Osteotomy /
Personalized
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Victor J, Dujardin J, Vandenneucker H, et al. Patient-specificguides do not improve accuracy in total knee arthroplasty: aprospective randomized controlled trial[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2014, 472(1): 263-271.
[2] Malhotra R, Singla A, Lekha C, et al. A prospective randomizedstudy to compare systemic emboli using the computer-assisted andconventional techniques of total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2015, 97(11): 889-894.
[3] Iorio R, Bolle G, Conteduca F, et al. Accuracy of manualinstrume ntation of tibial cutting guide in total knee arthroplasty[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2013, 21(10): 2296-2300.
[4] Krishnan SP, Dawood A, Richards R, et al. Areview of rapid prototyped surgical guides for patient-specific total knee replacement[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2012, 94(11): 1457-1461.
[5] Cozmei C, Caloian F. Additive manufacturing flickering at thebeginning of existence[J]. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2012, 3(12): 457-462.
[6] Nunley RM, Ellison BS, Ruh EL, et al. Are patient-specific cuttingblocks cost-effective for total knee arthroplasty[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2012, 470(3): 889-894.
[7] Lachiewicz PF, Henderson RA. Patient-specific instruments fortotal knee arthroplasty[J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2013, 21(9): 513-518.
[8] 吴东迎, 袁峰, 吴继彬, 等. 3D打印截骨导板在人工全系关节置换术中的应用[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2015, 35(9): 921-926.
[9] 刘峰, 张勇, 朱庭标, 等. 3D打印截骨导板辅助TKA治疗膝外翻畸形[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2017, 32(3): 329-331.
[10]Cip J, Widemschek M, Luegmair M, et al. Conventional versus computer-assisted technique for total knee arthroolasty: a minimum of 5-year follow-up of 200 patients in a prospective randomized comparative trial[J] . J Arthroplasty, 2014, 29(9): 1795-1802.
[11]Harvie P, Sloan K , Beaver RJ. Computer navigation vs conventional total knee arthroplasty five-year functional results of a prospective randomized trial[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2012, 27(5): 667-672.
[12]Gøothesen O, Espehaug B, Havelin LI, et al. Functional outcome and alignment in computer-assisted and conventionally operated total knee replacements: a multicentre parallel-group randomised controlled trial[J]. Bone Jiont J, 2014, 96-B(5): 609-618.
[13]Song EK, Seon JK, Yim JH, et al. Robotic-assisted TKA reduces postoperative alignment outliers and improves gap balance compared to conventional TKA[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2013, 471(1): 118-126.
[14]Bell SW, Anthony I, Jones B, et al. Improved accuracy of component positioning with robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: data from a prospective, randomized controlled study[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2016, 98(8): 627-635.
[15]Pearle AD, O'Loughlin PF, Kendoff DO. Robot-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2010, 25(2): 230-237.
基金
甘肃省民生科技专项-社会发展专题 (18CX3FG023)
京ICP备08002354号-3
