目的 通过建立手舟骨腰部骨折三维模型来比较3种不同内固定方式的生物力学差异，为临床内固定方式的选择提供依据。 方法 选取健康志愿者的腕关节CT数据，应用软件建立舟骨腰部骨折的3种内固定方式模型：克氏针固定组、Herbert螺钉固定组、钉脚固定器组。分别在中立握拳位和腕背伸桡偏位施加载荷，并分析舟骨变形量、内固定器械的应力。 结果 在3种内固定装置下舟骨的变形量，克氏针最大，钉脚固定器最小。在两种工况下，舟骨变形量和固定装置的最大应力值不等，但趋势相同，均为钉脚固定器的舟骨变形量最小、所受的最大应力最小。钉脚固定器存在偏心效应，当载荷达到临界值时，易使舟骨愈合面出现开裂或不对称偏心现象。 结论 克氏针固定效果最差，钉脚固定器的固定效果最佳，钉脚固定器术后应适当限制手部负重。
Abstract
Objective To compare the biomechanical differences among three internal fixation methods by establishing a three-dimensional model of scaphoid waist fracture, so as to provide a method of selection of clinical internal fixation. Methods The wrist CT data of a healthy volunteer were selected. The application software was used to establish three internal fixation models of scaphoid waist fracture: a Kirschner wire fixation group, a Herbert screw fixation group, and a nail-feet-fixation device group. Load was applied to the neutral grip position and radial deviation-extension, and the deformation of the scaphoid, and the stress of the internal fixation device were analyzed. Results Among three internal fixation devices, the largest deformation of the scaphoid was under the action of the Kirschner wire, and the smallest was under the action of the nail holder. Under the two working conditions, the deformation of the scaphoid and the maximum stress of the fixture was different, but the trend was the same. Under the nail holder, both the scaphoid deformation and the maximum stress were the smallest. But the nail holder had an eccentric effect. When the load reached a critical value, the scaphoid healing surface was easily cracked or asymmetrically eccentric. Conclusion Kirschner wire fixation and nail-feet fixation is the worst and best in effect, respectively. The weight of the hand should be properly restricted after nail-feet fixation.
关键词
舟骨 /
腰部骨折 /
内固定 /
有限元分析
Key words
Scaphoid /
Waist fracture /
Internal fixation /
Finite element analysis
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] Meyer C, Chang J, Stern P, et al. Complications of distal radial and scaphoid fracture treatment[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2013, 95(16): 1517-1526.
[2] Hove LM. Epidemiology of scaphoid fractures in Bergen, Norway[J]. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg, 1999, 33(4): 423-426.
[3] 洪加源, 肖建华, 曾荣铭. 掌侧逆行固定治疗腕舟骨腰部骨折三维有限元分析[J]. 生物骨科材料与临床研究, 2012, 9(1): 17-20.
[4] 郑文源, 陆芸, 孟立民, 等. 螺钉、克氏针内固定治疗距骨颈骨折的三维有限元分析[J]. 山东医药, 2013, 53(3): 7-9.
[5] 孟立民, 苏啸天, 张银光, 等. 微型外固定支架和克氏针治疗Bennett骨折的三维有限元分析[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2012, 16(9): 1626-1630.
[6] Ezquerro F, Jiménez S, Pérez A, et al. The influence of wire positioning upon the initial stability of scaphoid fractures fixed using Kirschner wires a finite element study[J]. Med Eng Phys, 2007, 29(6): 652-660.
[7] 郭阳, 孙丽颖, 荣起国, 等. 舟骨骨折螺钉固定方式的有限元分析[J]. 骨科临床与研究杂志, 2017, 2(2): 101-104.
[8] Moritomo H, Apergis EP, Herzberg G, et al. 2007 IFSSH committee report of wrist biomechanics committee: biomechanics of the so-called dart-throwing motion of the wrist[J]. J Hand Surg Am, 2007, 32(9): 1447-1453.
[9] 徐达传, 黄美贤. 手舟骨的形态血供特点及其临床意义[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2010, (2): 251-255.
[10] 刘卫华, 唐曦, 王智, 等. Micro CT三维重建手舟骨相关显微影像解剖学数据测量[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2014, 18(22): 3537-3541.
[11] 王敏, 周小兵, 赵胜, 等. 手舟骨血供3D可视化模型的制备[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2016, 34(6): 639-642.
[12] 张旭林, 何晓清, 徐永清. 腕舟骨骨折固定物研究进展[J]. 国际骨科学杂志, 2017, 38(6): 345-348.
[13]Li C, Xu X, Su Y, et al. Treatment of scaphoid fractures using a memory alloy nail-feet-fixation device[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2016, 86(7-8): 584-588.
[14]徐永清, 钟世镇, 徐达传, 等. 腕关节韧带解剖及组织学特性研究[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2005, 7(12): 1147-1151.
[15] Varga P, Zysset PK, Schefzig P, et al. A finite element analysis of two novel screw designs for scaphoid waist fractures[J]. Med Eng Phys, 2016, 38(2): 131-139.
京ICP备08002354号-3
