自体颗粒植骨与髂骨块植骨治疗单节段胸腰椎结核的疗效对比

李剑箫; 欧云生; 高永建; 赵增辉; 朱勇; 杜兴; 陈艳阳

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2018.03.020

中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (3) : 333-337. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2018.03.020

临床研究

自体颗粒植骨与髂骨块植骨治疗单节段胸腰椎结核的疗效对比

李剑箫¹，　欧云生¹，　高永建²，　赵增辉¹，　朱勇¹ ,　杜兴¹，　陈艳阳¹

作者信息 +

Autogenous morselized bone garft versus autogenous iliac bone graft in the treatment of thoracic and lumbar spinal tuberculosis

LI Jian-xiao¹, OU Yun-sheng¹, GAO Yong-jian², ZHAO Zeng-hui¹, ZHU Yong¹, DU Xing¹, CHEN Yan-yang¹

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

目的　回顾性观察自体颗粒植骨和髂骨块植骨在后路单节段胸腰椎结核手术中的临床疗效差异。方法　2012年8月至2016年6月行后路病灶清除、椎体间植骨融合内固定术治疗的58例单节段胸腰椎结核患者，按植骨方式不同分为两组，颗粒组31例，髂骨组27例。比较两组手术时间、术中出血量，手术前后的VAS、ODI评分、神经功能恢复，在影像学资料上记录两组节段后凸Cobb角和椎间高度的改善及末次随访时的丢失、植骨融合时间。结果　术后平均随访26(15~38)月，颗粒组手术时间(194.2±34.9) min、术中出血量(282.2±130.0) ml、植骨融合时间(5.8±1.0)月均优于髂骨组（240.0±61.5 min、540.7±276.6 ml、8.3±3.6月）（P<0.05）。两组术后、末次随访时节段后凸Cobb角和椎间高度均较术前明显改善（P<0.05），末次随访时颗粒组节段后凸Cobb角和椎间高度丢失稍大于髂骨块组，但两组间无明显统计学差异（P>0.05）。结论　和髂骨植骨相比，颗粒骨植骨方便易行，术中出血少，植骨融合快，应用于单节段胸腰椎结核手术中，是一种安全、有效的植骨方式。

Abstract

Objective　Retrospectively evaluate the clinical outcomes of autogenous morselized bone graft and autogenous iliac bone graft for single-segment thoracic and lumbar spinal tuberculosis.　Methods Between August 2012 to June 2016,58 cases of thoracic or lumbar spinal tuberculosis were treated by the surgery of interbody bone graft after debridement and fusion combined with posterior instrumentation.31 patients in group A underwent autogenous morselized bone graft and 27 cases in Group B underwent autogenous iliac bone graft. The surgical duration, blood loss, visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-Reactive protein (CRP), The intervertebral height, segment-kyphotic angle were recorded and compared. The loss of segment kyphotic angle and intervertebral space height，and the bone fusion time on X-ray or CT scanning at the time point of post-operation and follow-ups were recorded and compared.　Results　Final follow-up time ranged from 15 to 38 months，with an average of 26 months. The operation time was 194.2±34.9 min in group A and 240.0±61.5 minutes in group B（P<0.05）. The blood loss was 282.2±130.0 ml in group A and 540.7±276.6 ml in group B（P<0.05）. The bone fusion time was 5.8±1.0 months in group A and 8.3±3.6 months in group B（P<0.05）. Both groups got good kyphosis correction and intervertebral height restoration. The loss of kyphosis correction and intervertebral height in group A were found to be more than those in group B, but with no significant difference between group A and group B (P>0.05).　Conclusions　Based on this retrospective study, autogenous morselized bone graft has a shorter surgical duration, lower blood loss and shorter bone fusion time compared with the autogenous iliac bone graft. The autogenous morselized bone graft is a safe and effective approach in treating single-segment thoracic and lumbar tuberculosis.

导出引用

李剑箫,欧云生,高永建,赵增辉,朱勇,杜兴,陈艳阳. 自体颗粒植骨与髂骨块植骨治疗单节段胸腰椎结核的疗效对比[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志. 2018, 36(3): 333-337 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2018.03.020

LI Jian-xiao, OU Yun-sheng, GAO Yong-jian, ZHAO Zeng-hui, ZHU Yong, DU Xing, CHEN Yan-yang. Autogenous morselized bone garft versus autogenous iliac bone graft in the treatment of thoracic and lumbar spinal tuberculosis[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy. 2018, 36(3): 333-337 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2018.03.020

参考文献

[1] Ferrer M F, Torres L G, Ramírez O A, et al. Tuberculosis of the spine. A systematic review of case series[J]. Int Orthop, 2012, 36(2):221-31.
[2] De l G R R, Goodwin C R, Abu-Bonsrah N, et al. The epidemiology of spinal tuberculosis in the United States: an analysis of 2002-2011 data[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2016, 26(4):507-512.
[3] 官众, 许勇, 任磊, 等. 三种不同植骨方式在胸、腰椎结核手术治疗中的观察[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2013, 23(06):488-492.
[4] Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Mcenery KW, et al. Anterior fresh frozen structural allografts in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Do they work if combined with posterior fusion and instrumentation in adult patients with kyphosis or anterior column defects[J]? Spine, 1995, 20(12):1410-1418.

[5] 赵增辉, 朱勇, 罗伟, 等. 一期后路经单侧入路病灶清除植骨内固定治疗多节段胸腰椎结核[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2017, 31(9): 1073-1079.
[6] Zeng H, Zhang P, Shen X, et al. One-stage posterior-only approach in surgical treatment of single-segment thoracic spinal tuberculosis with neurological deficits in adults: a retrospective study of 34 cases[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2015, 16(1):186.
[7] Panchmatia JR, Lenke LG, Molloy S, et al. Review article: Surgical approaches for correction of post-tubercular kyphosis.[J]. J Orthop Surg（HK）, 2015, 23(3):391-394.
[8] Shen X, Liu H, Wang G, et al. Single-stage posterior-only approach treating single-segment thoracic tubercular spondylitis[J]. Int J Clin Exp Pathol,2015, 8(9):11051-11059.
[9] 吴鹏, 欧云生, 刘德龙, 等. 后路经单侧椎弓根病灶清除植骨内固定治疗胸腰椎结核的疗效分析[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2015, 29(10):1259-1264.
[10] Sundararaj GD, Amritanand R, Venkatesh K, et al. The use of titanium mesh cages in the reconstruction of anterior column defects in active spinal infections: can we rest the crest [J] ? Asian Spine J, 2011, 5(3):155-161.
[11] Kurz LT, Garfin SR, Jr BR. Harvesting autogenous iliac bone grafts. a review of complications and techniques[J]. Spine, 1989, 14(12):1324-1331.
[12] Tuli SM. Tuberculosis of the spine: a historical review[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2007, (460):29-38.
[13] Gong K, Wang Z, Luo Z. Single-stage posterior debridement and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with autogenous bone grafting and posterior instrumentation in the surgical management of lumbar tuberculosis[J]. Arch Ortho Trauma Surg, 2011, 131(2):217-223.
[14]Ohtori S, Suzuki M, Koshi T, et al. Single-level instrumented posterolateral fusion of the lumbar spine with a local bone graft versus an iliac crest bone graft: a prospective, randomized study with a 2-year follow-up[J]. Eur Spine J, 2011, 20(4):635-639.
[15]王丛, 陈根元, 杨成业, 等. 改良后路病灶清除打压植骨内固定治疗胸腰椎结核[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2011, 21(10):835-838.
[16]Tosun B, Erdemir C, Yonga O, et al. Surgical treatment of thoracolumbar tuberculosis: a retrospective analysis of autogenous grafting versus expandable cages.[J]. Eur Spine J, 2014, 23(11):2299-2306.
[17]Li H, Zou X, Xue Q, et al. Effects of autogenous bone graft impaction and tricalcium phosphate on anterior interbody fusion in the porcine lumbar spine.[J]. Acta Orthop Scand, 2004, 75(4):456-463.