基于2D/3D配准技术评估两种可调式颈托对椎间孔形态的影响
Evaluation of the effect of the two kinds of the adjustable neck bracket on the morphological parameters of intervertebral foramen based on 2D/3D registration technique
目的 基于2D/3D配准技术评估可调式颈托一代与二代对椎间孔形态的影响并进行对比，从而探讨哪种颈托可以更好地为颈椎病患者提供牵引治疗。 方法 利用2D/3D配准技术采集C2/3、C3/4、C4/5、C5/6双侧椎间孔面积等数据，计算不同角度椎间孔面积差值及面积增长率。统计对比颈托一代与二代不同角度椎间孔面积差值及面积增长率。 结果 通过对比，第二代颈托的牵引效果在颈椎大部分位置上统计学结果是显著的，差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05），尤其是C5/6节段在4个牵引角度上都是显著的。 结论 第二代颈托对于扩大椎间孔面积效果优于第一代颈托，能更有效地对颈椎病患者进行牵引治疗。
Objective To investigate the effect of the two kinds of the adjustable neck bracket on the morphological parameters of the intervertebral foramen based on 2D/3D registration technique. And compare the two to discuss which kind of neck bracket can better provide traction treatment for patients with cervical spondylosis. Methods The 2D/3D registration technique was used to measure the bilateral intervertebral foramen area of C2/3, C3/4, C4/5 and C5/6. The intervertebral foramen area growth rates of different angles were calculated. The d-value of intervertebral foramen area and area growth rate of different angles between the first and the second generation of the neck bracket were statistically compared. Results By contrast, the effect of the second generation of the adjustable neck bracket was statistically significant in most cervical vertebrae（P<0.05）. In particular, the C5/6 segment was significant at 4 angles. Conclusion The effect of the second generation of the neck bracket in the enlargement of the area of the intervertebral foramen is better than that of the first generation. And the traction therapy for patients with cervical spondylosis is more effectively.
2D/3D registration technique; / Adjustable neck bracket; / Morphological parameters of intervertebral foramen
[1] 尹立全,张洪侠,郝小波,等.神经肌肉关节促进法治疗神经根型颈椎病的疗效[J]. 中国老年学杂志,2015,35(20):5889-5890.
[2] Liu M,Cui L,Guan Y,et al.Single-fiber electromyography in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and cervical spondylosis[J].Muscle Nerve,2013,48(1):137-139.
[3] 潘晓华, 张贯石, 赵彤. 中老年颈椎病患者血管声像图与血流动力学改变[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2014, 34(19): 5593-5594.
[4] 王丽平, 廖彬, 徐沙丽. 法舒地尔注射联合颈椎牵引治疗椎动脉型颈椎病的临床研究[J]. 中国康复, 2015, 30(2):126-127.
[5] 平少华, 梁春雨, 刘昊. 痹祺胶囊联合手法及颈椎牵引治疗神经根型颈椎病的临床研究[J]. 中华中医药杂志, 2016, 31(2):742-744.
[6] Muhammad Umar, Naeem A, Badshah M, et al. Effectiveness of cervical traction combined with core muscle strengthening exercises in cervical radiculopathy[J]. Asia Pacific Family Medicine,2012,11(1):1-5.
[7] 汪芳俊, 魏威, 廖胜辉, 等. 前屈位不同角度牵引治疗颈椎病的有限元分析[J]. 中国骨伤, 2014, 27(7):592-596.
[8] 叶强, 李鉴轶, 李鹏, 等. 利用2D/3D配准技术开展直立位颈椎椎间孔形态学测量的可行性研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2015, 33(3): 288-294.
[9] 张鑫涛, 叶强, 李鉴轶, 等. 基于2D/3D配准技术测量颈椎间孔形态学的精度研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2016, 34(5): 495-498.
[10] 王艳国,郭秀琴,张琪,等.手法治疗神经根型颈椎病的系统评价[J].中华中医药杂志,2013,28(2):499-503.
[11]Chang YW, Winkelstein BA. Schwann cell proliferation and macrophage infiltration are evident at day 14 after painful cervical nerve root compression in the rat[J]. J Neurotrauma, 2011, 28(12): 2429-2438.
[12] 李曙明, 尹战海, 王莹. 神经根型颈椎病的影像学特点和分型[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2013, 21(1): 7-11.
[13] 张正丰, 梅芳瑞, 周军海. 下颈椎屈伸运动对椎间孔面积影响的实验研究[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 1998, 8(5): 22-25.
[14] 张正丰, 梅芳瑞, 周军海. 下颈椎屈伸运动节律的实验研究[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 1999, 6(1): 45-46.
[15] Moustafa IM, Diab AA, Harrison DE. Does rehabilitation of cervical lordosis influence sagittal cervical spine flexion extension kinematics in cervical spondylotic radiculopathy subjects? J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2016 Mar 27.
[16] Yoo J U, Zou D, Edwards W T, et al. Effect of cervical spine motion on the neuroforaminal dimensions of human cervical spine[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976),1992,17(10):1131~1136.
[17] 马峥, 沈磊, 白跃宏. 订制颈椎矫形器与成品颈托治疗椎动脉型颈椎病的比较[J].中国康复理论与实践,2010,16(4):385-386.
[18] 宣守松. 颈椎旋转微调手法配合颈托外固定治疗稳定型寰枢关节半脱位68例疗效观察[J]. 河北中医, 2011, 33(12): 1831-1832.
广东省省级科技计划项目(2012B091100314，2014A020212200,2015A040404022，2015B010125006，2015B010125005)
京ICP备08002354号-3/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
