不同国家人群胸椎椎弓根解剖结构的对比研究
Comparative research of anatomical structures of human thoracic pedicle in different countries
目的 通过文献回顾对比不同国家人群胸椎椎弓根解剖结构的异同，为胸椎手术中椎弓根钉的选择、手术成功率及安全性的提高奠定理论基础。 方法 以 “胸椎”、“椎弓根”、“解剖”、“测量”等为关键词，语言限定为英语或中文，在中国知识网、Pubmed、Web of knowledge等数据库中检索相关文献。排除不符合要求的文献，根据实验对象来源地将纳入文献进行国别划分，对比不同国家人群胸椎椎弓根解剖参数的异同。 结果 共20篇文献被纳入对比性研究。椎弓根高（pedicle height， PDH）最小值均位于T1，最大值位于T11或T12，中间椎序列PDH变化相对较小；不同国家人群椎弓根宽（pedicle width，PDW）均随椎序数的增加呈现先减小后增大的变化趋势，最小值位于T4或T5；虽然来自不同国家人群椎弓根水平面夹角（transverse pedicle angle，TPDA）数值存在一定差异，但均自T1~T10随椎序的增加呈减小趋势。 结论 不同国家人群胸椎椎弓根解剖参数随椎序变化呈现大致相同的变化趋势，但其具体解剖参数尚存在一定差异，熟悉上述解剖差异是提高手术成功率与安全性的关键。
Objective To compare the similarities and differences of human thoracic pedicle anatomical structures in different countries by literature review, and to provide a theoretical basis for the selection of pedicle screws in thoracic surgery and improve the operation success rate and safety. Methods To retrieve the related literature at home and abroad in CNKI, Pubmed, Web of knowledge and other database with the key words named "thoracic", "pedicle", "anatomy" and "measured", language limited to English or Chinese. Excluding the non-conforming literature, the remaining literature was divided into groups according to the origin of the experimental objects, and then the anatomical parameters of human thoracic vertebral pedicle in different countries were compared. Results A total of 20 articles were included after screening. The minimum value of pedicle height (PDH) was located at T1, and the maximum value was at T11 or T12, and the PDH varied relatively little at the middle levels of thoracic spine. In different countries, the pedicle width (PDW) decreased firstly and then increased from T1 to T12 and the minimum value was at T4 or T5. Although there were some differences in the numerical value of the pedicle horizontal (TPDA）angle in different countries, all of them were decreasing from T1 to T10. Conclusions The anatomical parameters of human thoracic vertebral pedicles in different countries show a similar trend with the change of vertebral body sequence, but there are some differences in anatomical parameters. Familiarity with the above anatomical differences is the key to improve the success rate and safety of surgery.
Thoracic spine / Pedicle / Anatomy / Measurement / Comparison among countries
[1] Yang G, Wang Z, Liu S, et al. A rare case of urachal carcinoma metastatic to thoracic vertebra detected by FDG PET/CT[J]. Clin Nucl Med, 2017, 42(7): 544-546.
[2] Yu HL, Xiang LB, Liu J, et al. Severe thoracic fracture dislocation[J]. Spine J, 2016, 16(10): e649-e650.
[3] Katzman WB, Vittinghoff E, Kado DM, et al. Thoracic kyphosis and rate of incident vertebral fractures: the Fracture Intervention Trial[J]. Osteoporos Int, 2016, 27(3): 899-903.
[4] Ghasemi AA, Ashoori S. Efficacy of pedicle screw fixation in unstable upper and middle thoracic spine fractures[J]. Trauma Mon, 2016, 21(1): e28627.
[5] Zhang BB, Zhang T, Tao HR, et al. Neurological complications of thoracic posterior vertebral column resection for severe congenital spinal deformities[J]. Eur Spine J, 2017, 26(7): 1871-1877.
[6] Farshad M, Betz M, Farshad-Amacker NA, et al. Accuracy of patient-specific template-guided vs. free-hand fluoroscopically controlled pedicle screw placement in the thoracic and lumbar spine: a randomized cadaveric study[J]. Eur Spine J, 2017, 26(3): 738-749.
[7] Jost GF, Walti J, Mariani L, et al. Inertial measurement unit-assisted implantation of thoracic, lumbar, and sacral pedicle screws improves precision of a freehand technique[J]. World Neurosurg, 2017, 103: 11-18.
[8] Kwan MK, Chiu CK, Gani SM, et al. Accuracy and safety of pedicle screw placement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients: a review of 2020 screws using computed tomography assessment[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2017, 42(5): 326-335.
[9] Solomiichuk V, Fleischhammer J, Molliqaj G, et al. Robotic versus fluoroscopy- guided pedicle screw insertion for metastatic spinal disease: a matched-cohort comparison[J]. Neurosurg Focus, 2017, 42(5): E13.
[10]Gu Y, Dong J, Jiang X, et al. Minimally invasive pedicle screws fixation and percutaneous vertebroplasty for the surgical treatment of thoracic metastatic tumors with neurologic compression[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2016, 41 Suppl 19: B14-B22.
[11]Kretzer RM, Chaput C, Sciubba DM, et al. A computed tomography-based morphometric study of thoracic pedicle anatomy in a random United States trauma population[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2011, 14(2): 235-243.
[12]Panjabi MM, Takata K, Goel V, et al. Thoracic human vertebrae. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1991,16(8): 888-901.
[13]Berry JL, Moran JM, Berg WS, et al. A morphometric study of human lumbar and selected thoracic vertebrae[J]. Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 1987, 12(4): 362-367.
[14]Zindrick MR, Wiltse LL, Doornik A, et al. Analysis of the morphometric characteristics of the thoracic and lumbar pedicles[J]. Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 1987,12(2): 160-166.
[15] Sheng SR, Chen JX, Chen W, et al. Cortical bone trajectory screws for the middle-upper thorax: An anatomico-radiological study[J]. Medicine, 2016, 95(35): e4676.
[16]崔冠宇, 田伟, 刘波, 等. 成人胸椎安全置入椎弓根钉相关的解剖形态特点及意义[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2016, 31(1): 1-5.
[17]Zhuang Z, Xie Z, Ding S, et al. Evaluation of thoracic pedicle morphometry in a Chinese population using 3D reformatted CT[J]. Clin Anat, 2012, 25(4): 461-467.
[18]Chen Y, Zeng J, Guan J, et al. Reformatted computed tomographic evaluation of the thoracic pedicle in a Chinese population for the surgical application of transpedicular screw placement[J]. Surg Radiol Anat, 2010, 32(5): 463-468.
[19]Lien SB, Liou NH, Wu SS. Analysis of anatomic morphometry of the pedicles and the safe zone for through-pedicle procedures in the thoracic and lumbar spine[J]. Eur Spine J, 2007, 16(8): 1215-1222.
[20]Hou S, Hu R, Shi Y. Pedicle morphology of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine in a Chinese population[J]. Spine, 1993, 18(13): 1850-1855.
[21]Kaur K, Singh R, Prasath V, et al. Computed tomographic-based morphometric study of thoracic spine and its relevance to anaesthetic and spinal surgical procedures[J]. J clin orthop trauma, 2016, 7(2): 101-108.
[22]Sinqh R, Srivastva SK, Prasath CS, et al. Morphometric measurements of cadaveric thoracic spine in Indian population and its clinical applications[J]. Asian spine J, 2011, 5(1): 20-34.
[23]Pai BS, Gangadhara, Nirmala S, et al. Morphometric analysis of the thoracic pedicle: an anatomico-radiological study[J]. Neurol India, 2010, 58(2): 253-258.
[24]Kim JH, Choi GM, Chang IB, et al. Pedicular and extrapedicular morphometric analysis in the Korean population: computed tomographic assessment relevance to pedicle and extrapedicle screw fixation in the thoracic spine[J]. J Korean Neurosurg Soc, 2009, 46(3): 181-188.
[25] Choi YS, Kim YJ, Yi HJ, et al. Pedicle morphometry for thoracic screw fixation in ethnic Koreans: radiological assessment using computed tomographic myelography[J]. J Korean Neurosurg Soc, 2009, 46(4): 317-321.
[26] Nojiri K, Matsumoto M, Chiba K, et al. Morphometric analysis of the thoracic and lumbar spine in Japanese on the use of pedicle screws[J]. Surg Radiol Anat, 2005, 27(2): 123-128.
[27]Liau KM, Yusof ML, Abdullah MS, et al. Computed tomographic morphometry of thoracic pedicles: safety margin of transpedicular screw fixation in malaysian malay population[J]. Spine, 2006, 31(16): E545-E550.
[28]Tan SH, Teo EC, Chua HC. Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy of cervical, thoracic and lumbar vertebrae of Chinese Singaporeans[J]. Eur Spine J, 2004, 13(2): 137-146.
[29]Ugur HC, Attar A, Uz A, et al. Thoracic pedicle: surgical anatomic evaluation and relations[J]. J Spinal Disord, 2001, 14(1): 39-45.
[30] Morales-Avalos R, Leyva-Villegas J, Sáanchez-Mejorada G, et al. Age- and gender-related variations in morphometric characteristics of thoracic spine pedicle A Study of 4,800 Pedicles[J]. Clin Anat, 2014, 27(3): 441-450.
京ICP备08002354号-3/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
