中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1): 93-97.doi: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2018.01.021

• 临床研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

富血小板血浆联合钻孔减压、同种异体腓骨支撑治疗早期股骨头坏死的研究

姜良斌1,2, 刘松1,2, 岳永彬1,2, 孙海忠1,2, 韦标方1   

  1. 1. 临沂市人民医院骨科,  山东   临沂    276001; 2. 广州中医药大学,  广州   510006
  • 收稿日期:2017-07-29 出版日期:2018-01-25 发布日期:2018-03-06
  • 作者简介:姜良斌, 博士,研究方向:中西医结合治疗股骨头坏死,E-mail:jianglb1984 @163.com
  • 基金资助:

    2014山东省科技发展计划(2014GSF119022)

Early research of the platelet-rich plasma (PRP) combined with core decompression and allogeneic fibula rod support for the treatment of the osteonecrosis of the femoral head

JIANG Liang-bin 1,2, LIU Song 1,2, YUE Yong-bin 1,2, SUN Hai-zhong 1,2,WEI Biao-fang 1   

  1. 1.Department of Orthopedics, Linyi People's Hospital, Linyi 276001, Shandong Province, China; 2.Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510006, China
  • Received:2017-07-29 Online:2018-01-25 Published:2018-03-06

摘要:

目的 探讨富血小板血浆(PRP)促进早期股骨头坏死修复的作用效果。  方法 2014年7月至2017年5月, 将采用改良二次离心法制作的 PRP 用于治疗早期股骨头坏死26 例(35髋)( PRP 组)。采用非PRP治疗的治疗早期股骨头坏死24例(32髋)患者(对照组),两组进行疗效比较,术后1、3、6个月行X线片复查,观察病情变化,用髋关节Harris评分、疼痛VAS评分进行疗效评价,观察比较两组股骨头修复情况以及坏死进展并加以分析。 结果 两组患者均获随访,随访时间6个月。1.术后6个月影像学检查显示,PRP组患者股骨头外形良好,均未发生变形及塌陷,同种异体腓骨整合良好,股骨头密度增加。对照组7例发生塌陷,同种异体腓骨与股骨头界限明显,整合差。末次随访时效果明显优于对照组。2. PRP组Harris髋关节评分由术前(67.82±9.61)分提高至末次随访的(88.45±6.02)分,对照组Harris髋关节评分由术前(69.74±8.26)分提高至末次随访的(78.36±6.17)分;PRP组疼痛VAS评分由术前(4.6±1.2)分下降至末次随访的(1.7±1.0)分,对照组疼痛VAS评分由术前(4.3±0.9)分下降至末次随访的(2.3±1.1)分。两组治疗前后比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。  结论 临床使用富血小板血浆后可以改善患者髋部疼痛、关节功能,促进骨长入,具有显著的临床应用价值。

关键词: 富血小板血浆,  股骨头坏死,  同种异体腓骨,  钻孔减压

Abstract:

Objective To investigate the potency of the platelet-rich plasma (PRP) combined with core decompression and allogeneic fibula rod support for the treatment of the osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Methods From July 2014 to May 2017, 26 cases (35 hips) of osteonecrosis of the femoral head were treated with platelet-rich plasma combined with core decompression and allogeneic fibula rod support (PRP group) and 24 cases (32 hips) with core decompression and allogeneic fibula rod support only (control group). At 1, 3,6 months after operation, Patients were followed up and evaluated using Harris hip score、VAS score and radiography. Results All the patients(67 hips) were followed up thoroughly and the follow-up periods were 6 months. At 6 months after operation, the shape of the femoral heads of the PRP groups was good with no deformation and collapse. The location of the top of the allograft fibula rod was perfect with no fibula rod out. The fibula rods made integration with the surrounding bone without infection. Harris score of PRP group before and after treatment increased from 67.82±9.61 to 88.45±6.02, Harris score of control group before and after treatment increased from 69.74±8.26 to 78.36±6.17;VAS score of PRP group before and after treatment increased from 4.6±1.2 to 1.7±1.0, VAS score of control group before and after treatment increased from 4.3±0.9 to 2.3±1.1. There were statistically significant differences in the pre-therapy and post-treatment groups (P<0.05) and there were statistically significant differences in the postoperation between the two groups (P<0.05). Conclusions Use of the platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in clinic can ease hip pain and improve joint function, and it is highly valuable in clinical use.

Key words: Platelet-rich plasma,  Osteonecrosis of the femoral head,   Allogeneic fibula rod,  Core decompression