两种改进的自体骨融合方式在后路腰椎融合术中的应用研究

钟志宏; 周葳; 余灏涛; 张亮; 张志; 张平; 李健

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2017.06.016

中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (6) : 671-675. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2017.06.016

临床研究

两种改进的自体骨融合方式在后路腰椎融合术中的应用研究

钟志宏，　周葳，　余灏涛，　张亮，　张志，　张平，　李健

作者信息 +

Study of the clinical effects of two improved autogenous bone fusion methods

ZHONG Zhi-hong, ZHOU Wei, YU Hao-tao, ZHANG Liang, ZHANG Zhi, ZHANG Pin, LI Jian

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

目的　回顾研究两种改进的自体骨融合方案(自体颗粒骨打压植骨、自体骨cage植骨)与PEEK cage植骨在腰椎后路融合手术中的临床疗效差异，旨在证实其临床价值。方法　收集2010年6月至2016年6月因退行性腰椎疾患在我科行腰椎融合术的患者，根据腰椎融合的采用情况将患者分为自体骨打压组36例、自体骨cage组35例、PEEK cage组39例。观察手术前后的 VAS、ODI评分，并在影像学资料上计算术后24h、术后6月、术后12月的椎间隙高度丢失度及椎体融合率。术前患者一般资料无统计学差异，资料可比性良好。结果　三组术后均未发生严重的手术相关并发症。影像学结果示术后6月、12月的椎体高度丢失度分别为：打压植骨组(6.1±2.5、6.5±3.8)%；自体骨cage组(5.6±2.9、5.8±3.7)%；PEEK cage 组(5.4±3.3、5.9±4.1)%。术后6月、12月的椎间相对融合率为：打压植骨组(27.5±10.5、26.5±9.1)%；自体骨cage组(31.2±8.7、28.1±8.7)%；PEEK cage 组(28.4±7.1、29.3±8.2)%。各组结果均无统计学差异(P＞0.05)。术后三组的ODI、VAS评分亦无统计学差异(P＞0.05)。结论　三组术后的临床疗效及术后融合率无明显差异，自体颗粒骨打压植骨、自体骨cage植骨融合效果良好。

Abstract

Objective　To retrospectively study the clinical effect of two improved autologous bone lumber interbody fusion methods (autogenous bone interbody fusion cage(ABIF) and autogenous morselized bone graft impaction(AMBI)) compared with the PEEK cage fusion.　Methods　The clinical data of 110 cases of patients who took the lumber fusion surgery from 2010 to 2016 were collected. All the cases were divided into three groups by the fusion method: AMBI:36 cases, ABIF:35 cases, PEEK:39 cases. The VAS score, ODI score at the time point of pre-operation, 6 months post-operation and 12 months post-operation were evaluated, the loss of intervertebral space height on X-ray and the relative fusion rate on CT scanning at the time point of 24 h post-operation, 6 months post-operation and 12 months post-operation was evaluated. The general information of three groups had no statistical significance, indicating good comparability of the three groups.　Result　All three groups had no serious complications. The loss of intervertebral space height 6m and 12 m post-operation of each group: AMBI:(6.1±2.5、6.5±3.8)%, ABIF:(5.6±2.9、5.8±3.7)%；PEEK:(5.4±3.3、5.9±4.1)%,the relative fusion rate 6 months and 12 months post-operation of each group: AMBI:(27.5±10.5、26.5±9.1)%, ABIF:(31.2±8.7、28.1±8.7)%, PEEK:(28.4±7.1、29.3±8.2)%。Statistical results showed VAS score, ODI score, loss of intervertebral space height and the relative fusion rate 6m and 12m post-operation of each group have no statistical significance (P＞0.05). Conclusion　All three groups have the same clinical effect and fusion rate, the result indicate a good promise of clinical application of AMBI and ABIF.

导出引用

钟志宏,周葳,余灏涛,张亮,张志,张平,李健. 两种改进的自体骨融合方式在后路腰椎融合术中的应用研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志. 2017, 35(6): 671-675 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2017.06.016

ZHONG Zhi-hong, ZHOU Wei, YU Hao-tao, ZHANG Liang, ZHANG Zhi, ZHANG Pin, LI Jian. Study of the clinical effects of two improved autogenous bone fusion methods[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy. 2017, 35(6): 671-675 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2017.06.016

参考文献

[1] Lawrence JP, Waked W, Gillon TJ, et al. rhBMP-2(ACS and CRM formulations) overcomes pseudarthrosis in a New Zealand white rabbit posterolateral fusion model[J]. Spine, 2007, 32(11):1206-1213.
[2] Park JJ, Hershman SH, Kim YH. Updates in the use of bone grafts in the lumbar spine[J].Bull Hosp Jt Dis, 2013, 71(1):39-48.
[3] Baker JF, Errico TJ, Kim Y, et al. Degenerative spondylolistheis: contemporary review of the role of interbody fusion[J].Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2017, 27(2):169-180.
[4] Assem Y, Mobbs RJ, Pelletier MH, et al. Radiological and clinical outcomes of novel Ti/PEEK combined spinal fusion cages:a systematic review and preclinical evaluation[J]. Eur Spine J, 2017, 26(3):593-605.
[5] Chong E, Pelletier MH, Mobbs RJ, et al. The design evoultion of interbody cages in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review[J].BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2015, 16(1):99-110.
[6] Boden SD. Overview of the biology of lumbar spine fusion and principles for selecting a bone graft substitute[J]. Spine, 2002, 27(16 Suppl 1):S26-S31.
[7] 王小刚, 罗建平, 杨彬, 等. 新型后路同种异体骨解剖形腰椎融合器治疗腰椎间盘突出症的疗效分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2016, 34(4):450-453.
[8] Salamanna F, Sartori M, Brodano GB, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of spinal arthrodesis: from preclinical research to clinical scenario[J]. Stem cell Int, 2017, 2017(407):1-27.
[9] Madan S, Boeree NR. Outcome of posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion for spondylolytic spondylolisthesis[J].Spine, 2002, 27(14): 1536-1542.
[10]Buser Z, Brodke DS, Youssef JA, et al. Synthetic bone graft versus autograft or allograft for spinal fusion: a systematic review[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2016, 25(4):509-516.
[11]Tuchman A, Brodke DS, Youssef JA, et al. Iliac crest bone graft versus local autograft or allograft for lumbar spinal fusion: a systematic review[J]. Global Spine J, 2016, 6(6):592-606.
[12]Wang L, Huang H, Zhang Z, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of a novel autogenous bone interbody fusion cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion in a cadaveric model[J]. Spine, 2014, 39(11):E684–E692.
[13]钟志宏, 李健, 张平, 等. Cage椎弓根内固定联合自体颗粒骨打压植骨的即时生物力学稳定性[J]. 中国组织工程研究与临床康复, 2011, 15(26): 4825-4828.
[14]李健, 石林毅, 黄景祥, 等. 自体骨cage 在后路腰椎间融合手术中的临床应用观察[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2013, 29(16): 2701-2704.
[15]李健, 张震山, 赵洪普, 等. 自体颗粒骨打压植骨腰椎椎间融合术治疗下腰椎退变性不稳的疗效[J]. 广州医学院学报, 2010, 38(5):24-27.