超声测量跖筋膜的数字化评价

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2017.05.008

中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 513-520.doi: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2017.05.008

超声测量跖筋膜的数字化评价

吴静¹，　高阳¹，　王晓磊²，　张元智³

1.内蒙古医科大学附属医院影像科，呼和浩特 010050； 2.内蒙古医科大学附属医院超声科，呼和浩特010050；
3.内蒙古医科大学附属医院骨科，呼和浩特 010050

收稿日期:2017-05-18 出版日期:2017-09-25 发布日期:2017-10-30
通讯作者: 张元智，教授，硕士生导师，Tel：15335576855，E-mail: dryzzhang@163.com
作者简介:吴静（1981-），女，硕士研究生，副主任医师，研究方向：临床放射学，Tel：13674881470，E-mail: 27180849@qq.com
基金资助:
内蒙古医科大学科技百万工程项目（YKD2016KJB W-LH 015）

Digital evaluation of the reliability of plantar fascia by ultrasonography

WU Jing¹, GAO Yang¹, WANG Xiao-lei², ZHANG Yuan-zhi³

1. Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot 010050, China; 2. Department of Ultrasound，The Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot 010050, China; 3. Department of Orthopaedics, The Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot 010050, China

Received:2017-05-18 Online:2017-09-25 Published:2017-10-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　通过数字化分析评价超声测量跖筋膜的准确度。方法　选取2014年5月至2016年5月内蒙古医科大学附属医院50名健康成人志愿者，男25名，女25名；年龄为18～51岁，平均(31.6±3.5)岁，身高155~181 cm，平均(172.3±7.6) cm；体重49~90 kg，平均(78.3 ±3.6) kg，分别行双足CT断层、MRI断层与超声检查，记录超声图像上的跖筋膜厚度，将CT、MRI原始图像数据以dicom格式导入Materialise Mimics Innovation Suite 16.0软件，进行数字化分析、测量，比较三者的相关性。结果　超声、CT、MRI三者之间的测量在同性别之间差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。同一性别的左、右两侧差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05），而同一侧在男、女性别之间差异有统计学意义，三种检查结果跖筋膜平均厚度男性大于女性，（P＜0.05）。结论　超声检查能够为跖筋膜厚度的测量提供相对简便的方法而且准确度较高。

关键词: 超声, 　跖筋膜, 　数字化

Abstract:

Objective　To evaluate the reliability of the plantar fascia by ultrasonography.　Methods 50 healthy adult volunteers (25 males and 25 females) were involved in this research. Images of the plantar fascia from 100 feet were acquired by ultrasonography, CT and MRI scanning, and recording the plantar fascia thickness of ultrasound image. Image data of CT and MRI in DICOM format were transformed into Materialise Mimics Innovation Suite 16 software for digital analysis. The reliability was compared among these three image data.　Results　There was no significant difference among the three groups in ultrasound, CT and MRI in the same gender (P>0.05). There was no statistical significance of the same sex differences between the left and right sides (P>0.05). There was significant difference of the same side between the male and female.the average thickness of the plantar fascia in males was larger than in females (P<0.05).Conclusion　Ultrasonography can provide a relatively simple and reliable method for the measurement of plantar fascia thickness.

Key words: Uhrasonography, 　Plantar fascia, 　Digital

吴静，高阳，王晓磊，张元智 . 超声测量跖筋膜的数字化评价[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2017, 35(5): 513-520.

WU Jing1, GAO Yang1, WANG Xiao-lei2, ZHANG Yuan-zhi3. Digital evaluation of the reliability of plantar fascia by ultrasonography[J]. Chinese Journal Of Clinical Anatomy, 2017, 35(5): 513-520.

参考文献

[1] Covey CJ, Mulder MD. Plantar fasciitis: How best to treat [J] ? J Fam Pract, 2013, 62(9): 466-471.
[2] Draghi F, Gitto S, Bortolotto C, et al. Imaging of plantar fascia disorders: findings on plain radiography, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging [J]. Insights Imaging, 2017, 8(1): 69-78.
[3] Osborne HR, Breidahl WH, Allison GT. Critical differences in lateral X-rays with and without a diagnosis of plantar fasciitis [J]. J Sci Med Sport, 2006, 9(3): 231-237.
[4] Mohseni-Bandpei MA, Nakhaee M, Mousavi ME, et al. Application of ultrasound in the assessment of plantar fascia in patients with plantar fasciitis: a systematic review [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2014, 40(8): 1737-1754.
[5] Chen H, Ho HM, Ying M, et al. Association between plantar fascia vascularity and morphology and foot dysfunction in individuals with chronic plantar fasciitis [J]. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 2013, 43(10): 727-734.
[6] McMillan AM, Landorf KB, Gregg JM, et al. Hyperemia in plantar fasciitis determined by power Doppler ultrasound [J]. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 2013, 43(12): 875-880.
[7] Mendon.a JA, Provenza JR, Appenzeller S.Positive power Doppler signal in plantar fasciitis [J]. Rheumatol Int, 2013, 33(2): 507-509.
[8] Walther M, Radke S, Kirschner S, et al. Power Doppler findings in plantar fasciitis [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2004, 30(4): 435-440.
[9] Wu CH. A few considerations on "Ultrasound elastography in the early diagnosis of plantar fasciitis" [J]. Clin Imaging, 2015, 39(1): 165.
[10]Chimutengwende-Gordon M, O'Donnell P, Singh D. Magnetic resonance imaging in plantar heel pain [J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2010, 31(10): 865-870.
[11]Huang CK, Kitaoka HB, An KN, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of longitudinal arch stability [J] .Foot Ankle, 1993, 14(6):353-357.
[12] Irving DB，Cook JL，Young MA，et al. Obesity and pronated foot typemay increase the risk of chronic plantar heel pain: a matched case-control study[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord，2007, 8: 41.
[13] Alotaibi AK, petrofsky JS, Daher NS, et al. Effect of Monophasic Pulsed Current on Heel Pain and Functional Activities caused by Plantar Fasciitis[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2015, 21: 833-839.
[14] Van Middelkoop M, Kolkman J, Van Ochten J, et al. Risk factors for lower extremity injuries among male marathon runners[J]. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 2008, 18(6): 691-697.
[15]Fong DT, Pang KY, Chung MM, et al. Evaluation of combined prescription of rocker sole shoes and custom-made foot orthoses for the treatment of plantar fasciitis[J]. Clin Biomech(Bristol,Avon), 2012, 27(10): 1072-1077.
[16]Crofts G, Angin S, Mickle KJ, et al. Reliability of ultrasound for measurement of selected foot structures [J]. Gait Posture, 2014, 39(1): 35-39.
[17] Angin S, Crofts G, Mickle KJ, et al. Ultrasound evaluation of foot muscles and plantar fascia in pes planus [J]. Gait Posture, 2014, 40(1): 48-52.
[18] 宋烨，李园，陆雯，等. 超声检查跖腱膜厚度和回声的信度研究[J].中华创伤骨科杂志，2014, 16(6): 486-489．
[19] 余雪玲，邓福珠，张立，等. 肌肉骨骼超声用于慢性足底筋膜炎临床诊断的价值探讨[J].现代医用影像学，2017, 26(3): 801-802.
[20] Kane D，Balint PV，Sturroek R，et a1．Musculoskeletal ultrasound a state of the art review in rheumatology．Part 1：Current controversies and issues in the development of musculoskeletal ultrasound in rheumatology[J]．Rheumatology (Oxford)，2004, 43(7): 823-828.
[21]Sabir N，Demirlenk S，Yagci B，et a1．Clinical utility of sonography in diagnosing plantar fasciitis[J]．J Ultrasound Med，2005，24(8)：1041-1048.
[22]Rathleff MS, Moelgaard C, Lykkegaard Olesen J． Intra- and interobserver reliability of quantitative ultrasound measurement of the plantar fascia [J]．J Clin Ultrasound，2011, 39(3): 128-134.
[23] Ozdemir H，Yilmaz E，Murat A，el a1．Sonographic evaluation of plantar fasciitis and relation to body mass index[J]．Eur J Radiol，2005，54(3)：443-447.
[24]Gibbon WW，Long G．Ultrasound of the plantar aponeurosis (fascia) [J]．Skeletal Radiol，1999, 28(1): 21-26.
[25] McMillan AM，Landorf KB，Barrett JT，et al．Diagnostic imaging for chronic plantar heel pain：a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]．J Foot Ankle Res，2009, 2: 32.

超声测量跖筋膜的数字化评价

Digital evaluation of the reliability of plantar fascia by ultrasonography

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0

[1]	廖晓霜, 鲁辉, 刘融, 魏在荣, 周健, 陈伟, 蒋海芳, 聂开瑜. 基于三维测量的颞浅动脉干解剖学研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2023, 41(3): 263-269.
[2]	汪斐, 徐灏, 姜江, 杨萃, 贾蕊, 杜冰冉, 李鉴轶. 机械臂超声成像结合超声-CT配准技术构建胫股关节在体检测系统的可行性及精度分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2023, 41(3): 336-341.
[3]	杨静怡, 胡昕, 姚洁, 徐洲, 杨智, 陈志, 吴毅. 基于中国数字化人体的支气管树三维模型构建及纤维支气管镜手术模拟仿真[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2023, 41(1): 1-7.
[4]	李梓瑜, 李琨, 郭燕, 越洒, 曲星月, 刘宇航, 张凤珍, 王星, 徐以发, 李志军, 李筱贺, 张少杰. 数字儿童颅底及颈部可视化模型建立研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2022, 40(6): 639-643.
[5]	杨巧华, 颜滨, 李征毅, 杜冰冉, 汝首航, 姜江, 汪斐, 贾蕊, 李鉴轶. 不同体位下青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者椎旁肌的超声影像测量与分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2022, 40(6): 655-659.
[6]	阿拉木斯, 张元智, 胡旭锋, 刘刚, 刘亚欧, 莫伟鹏, 郝晓东, 李严兵. 青少年骶骨骶髂螺钉钉道增龄变化的数字化评估[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2022, 40(4): 398-403.
[7]	胡闻珂, 邵欣欣, 杜少华, 戴双武, 邝玉媚, 许广威. 重视超声在鉴别骨与软组织肿瘤复发中的价值[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2022, 40(3): 327-332.
[8]	常叶, 王琳琳, 蔺春红. 4D-HyCoSy结合造影剂逆流时宫腔压力测量评价输卵管通畅度的诊断价值[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2022, 40(2): 234-238.
[9]	刘瑞可, 李桂芳, 王影, 杜学谦. 早产儿脑室周围-脑室内出血与小脑发育的相关研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2021, 39(6): 654-659.
[10]	王一丹, 许阳阳, 和雨洁, 高明杰, 蔡永强, 金凤, 张云凤, 王利东, 王海燕, 李筱贺, 李志军, 高尚. 内蒙古地区蒙古族青年大学生面部解剖学参数三维数字化测量#br#[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2021, 39(3): 252-258.
[11]	柳莉, 叶玉琴, 祁雅婕, 王翠翠, 邢英琦. 高频超声对国人四肢周围神经及颈部神经根正常值的研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2021, 39(3): 276-281.
[12]	蓝家富, 钟秋红, 陆启升, 张秋艳 . 产前超声诊断先天性马蹄内翻足的应用价值[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2021, 39(3): 359-362.
[13]	刘瑞可, 李桂芳, 杜学谦, 陈帅. 新生儿小脑发育与胎龄的相关性研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2021, 39(2): 140-144.
[14]	陈韦东, 谭炜浩, 钟锦涛, 杨斌, 陈志敏, 马纯玲, 瞿东滨, 郑明辉. 胸椎旁神经阻滞技术的研究进展[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2021, 39(1): 111-114.
[15]	赵宁波, 冯文霞, 邓芬, 董常峰, 周鹏, 贡雪灏. 肝移植术后肝动脉狭窄频谱Tardus Parvus波形和超声造影微灌注定量技术的临床价值[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2020, 38(6): 723-727.