肘管的解剖特点对原位松解术治疗肘管综合征的疗效影响

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2017.04.020

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　探讨肘管的解剖特点，为肘管综合征的手术方式的选择提供参考意义。方法　选取81例肘管综合征患者，依据其肘管的解剖构造特点分为A、B两组，A 组：肘管支持带的厚度≥1.4 mm者，或者肘管支持带被滑车上肘肌取代者，共39例，B组：肘管支持带的厚度＜1.4 mm者，共42例，均实施尺神经原位松解术，术后随访12个月，我们将两组的有效率进行比较。结果　两组的有效率具有显著差异（P＜0.05）， A组的有效率为92.31%， B组的有效率为76.19%。结论　对于肘管支持带较厚者，或者直接被滑车上肘肌的患者，引发肘管综合征的病因考虑为被增厚的弓状韧带或者被滑车上肘肌卡压，故实施尺神经原位松解术的效果好，而肘管支持带相对较薄者，实施尺神经原位松解术治疗效果较差，考虑这类肘管综合征患者为尺神经完全屈肘时遭到牵拉引起，而非卡压造成。

关键词: 肘管综合征, , , 肘管支持带, , , 滑车上肘肌

Abstract:

Objective　To explore anatomic feature of cubital tunnel, and to provide reference for the decompression treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome.　Methods　We selected 81 patients with cubital tunnel syndrome, and divided these patients into two groups, in accordance with the feature of cubtial tunnel. Group A: It included the patients whose thickness of cubital tunnel retinaculum was ≥1.40 mm, or the cubital tunnel retinaculum was replaced by epitrochleo-anconeus. There were 39 cases in all. Group B: It included the patients whose thickness of cubital tunnel retinaculum was＜1.40 mm, there were 42 cases. Two groups were treated by in situ decompression treatment. The patients were followed up for 12 months. We compared the efficacy rate of two groups.　Results　There was statistical significance of the effective rate of two groups (P<0.05). The effective rate of group A was 92.31%. The efficacy rate of group B was 76.19%.　Conclusions　For the patients whose cubital tunnel retinaculum was thicken or is replaced by epitrochleo-anconeus, the origin of cubital tunnel syndrome was that the ulnar nerve was compressed by the thickened cubital tunnel retinaculum or the epitrochleo-anconeus. Therefore, the result of in situ decompression treatment was better, however, for those with a thinner cubital tunnel retinaculum, the result of in situ decompression treatment is poor. For these cases, we consider that the cubital tunnel syndrome is caused by the excessive stretch of the ulnar nerve when the elbow full flexion rather than it being compressed.

Key words: Cubital tunnel syndrome; , Cubital tunnel retinaculum; , Epitrochleo-anconeus

贾科锋. 肘管的解剖特点对原位松解术治疗肘管综合征的疗效影响[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2017, 35(4): 453-455.

JIA Ke-feng. The anatomical features of cubital tunnel influence on the outcomes of in situ decompression treatment for cubital tunnel syndrome[J]. Chinese Journal Of Clinical Anatomy, 2017, 35(4): 453-455.

参考文献

[1] Contreras MG, Warner MA, Charboneau WJ, et al. Anatomy of the ulnar nerve at the elbow: potential relationship of acute ulnar neuropathy to gender differences [J]. Clin Anat, 1998, 11(6): 372-378.
[2] O'Driscoll SW, Horii E, Carmichael SW, et al. The cubital tunnel and ulnar neuropathy [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1991, 73(4): 613-617.
[3] Dinh PT, Gupta R. Subtotal medial epicondylectomy as a surgical option for treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome [J]. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg, 2005, 9(1): 52-59.
[4] 贾科锋，丁实，翟丽东, 等. 肘管与滑车上肘肌的解剖学研究及其临床意义 [J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志，2011, 29（2）：140-144.
[5] Gervasio O, Zaccone C. Surgical approach to ulnar nerve compression at the elbow caused by the epitrochleoanconeus muscle and a prominent medial head of the triceps [J]. Neurosurgery, 2008, 62(3 Suppl 1): 186-192.
[6 Jeon IH, Fairbairn KJ, Neumann L, et al. MR imaging of edematous anconeus epitrochlearis: another cause of medial elbow pain [J]. Skeletal Radiol, 2005, 34(2): 103-107.
[7] Karatas A, Apaydin N, Uz A, et al. Regional anatomic structures of the elbow that may potentially compress the ulnar nerve [J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2009, 18(4): 627-631.
[8] Mitsionis GI, Manoudis GN, Paschos NK, et al. Comparative study of surgical treatment of ulnar nerve compression at the elbow [J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2010, 19(4): 513-519.
[9] Keiner D, Gaab MR, Schroeder HW, et al. Comparison of the long-term results of anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve or simple decompression in the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome--a prospective study [J]. Acta Neuro chir, 2009, 151(4): 311-315.
[10] McGowan AJ. The result of transposition of the ulnar nerve for traumatic ulnar neuritis [J]. Bone Joint Surg Br, 1950, 32(3):293–301.
[11] Palmer BA. Cubital tunnel syndrome [J]. J Hand Surg Am， 2010, 35(1):153-163.
[12]杨稀月，黄格朗，陶宗欣. 正常肘管的高频超声检测及临床意义[J]. 微创医学， 2012, 7（5）：465-468.
[13] Macnicol MF. The results of operation for ulnar neuritis [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1979, 61(2):159-164.
[14]Bacle G, Marteau E, Freslon M, et al. Cubital tunnel syndrome: comparative results of a multicenter study of 4 surgical techniques with a mean follow-up of 92 months [J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2014, 100(4 Suppl):S205-208.
[15] Soltani AM, Best MJ, Francis CS, et al. Trends in the surgical treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome: an analysis of the national survey of ambulatory surgery database [J] J Hand Surg Am, 2013, 34(8): 1551-1556.
[16] Charles YP, Coulet B, Rouzaud JC et al. Comparative clinical outcomes of submuscular and subcutaneous transposition of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome [J]. J Hand Surg Am, 2009, 34(5): 866-874.
[17] Watts AC, Bain GL. Patient-rated outcome of ulnar nerve decompression: a comparison of endoscopic and open in situ decompression [J]. J Hand Surg Am, 2009, 34(8): 1492-1498.
[18] Ahcan U, Zorman P. Endoscopic decompression of the ulnar nerve at the elbow [J]. J Hand Surg Am, 2007, 32(8): 1171-1176.

[1]	江剑宏, 段仁鹏, 李晓锋. 国人胆道三维重建解剖变异应用研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 1-4.
[2]	郭红志, 王瑜, 张加琪, 梁海彬, 马梓玮, 冯伟, 吴忧, 司子燚. 血管铸型结合CT三维模型评估先兆子痫胎盘血管结构[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 5-10.
[3]	李佳伟, 张静, 李灿然, 兰文杰, 籍庆余, 郭志勇, 张云凤, 刘启, 陈清威, 李筱贺. 蒙古族人群股骨近端解剖参数X线测量[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 11-16.
[4]	李琨, 张燕, 郭冉, 郝咪咪, 吴轩宇, 徐艺芳, 王超群, 马文童, 张灵淇, 杨宏宇, 李志军, 张少杰, 王星. 儿童及青少年枕颈角与后枕颈角数字化测量及其临床意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 17-20.
[5]	李文, 杨思艺, 黄蕾, 卿霁雯, 蒋松涛, 张磊. 基于MRI探讨Lisfranc韧带的形态学特点及临床意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 21-25.
[6]	李凡凡, 徐阳, 王晓旭. 紫草素调节Nrf2/HO-1信号通路对实验性大鼠肉芽肿性小叶性乳腺炎的治疗作用研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 26-32.
[7]	王兴航, 丁佳媛, 李放, 包翠芬, 阎丽菁. 人参皂苷Rg1通过抑制NLRP3炎症小体途径减轻氧糖剥夺/复供后小胶质细胞炎症反应[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 33-41.
[8]	程莹莹, 武建军, 蔡海燕, 焦旭文, 马江波, 丁银秀. 体外炎性诱导星形胶质细胞激活及功能分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 42-46.
[9]	祁志, 杨力, 贾秋叶, 陈浩伦, 段兆达, 吴春云. 依达拉奉经MAPKs通路对脂多糖激活的小胶质细胞Sirt3表达调控[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 47-53.
[10]	张晶晶, 王洪新. 黄芩苷通过PDGF/P38 MAPK信号通路对肺动脉高压大鼠的保护作用[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 54-58.
[11]	乐钦, 陈荣丽, 熊婧熙, 王婷怡, 蔡志恒, 易秋实, 曾心怡. 白芨多糖对大鼠跨区皮瓣choke区的影响[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 59-64.
[12]	李笑予, 张磊, 付磊, 李东波, 汪国友. 三步接骨法治疗Sanders Ⅱ型跟骨骨折的有限元研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 65-70.
[13]	吴研飞, 马剑雄, 卢斌, 王颖, 柏豪豪, 靳洪震, 马信龙. CT后处理技术重建CT值与终板抗压强度的相关性研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 71-76.
[14]	庄万强, 唐毅, 骆勇刚, 张辉. 关节镜联合胫骨高位截骨术对髌骨位置及髌股关节功能影响的早中期回顾性研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 77-82.
[15]	罗鹰, 窦伟誉, 吴小杭, 陈璟昆, 彭昌贵, 潘剑英 . 微创海马钢板内固定治疗跟骨骨折并发症的影响因素[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 83-88.