两种方法治疗股骨干骨折合并较大游离骨块的效果比较

殷渠东; 顾三军; 徐可林; 芮永军; 孙振中; 刘军

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2017.01.020

中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2017, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1) : 98-101. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2017.01.020

临床研究

两种方法治疗股骨干骨折合并较大游离骨块的效果比较

殷渠东，　顾三军，　徐可林，　芮永军，　孙振中，　刘军

作者信息 +

Effect comparison of two methods for treatment of large free bone block associated with femoral shaft fractures

YIN Qu-dong, GU San-jun, XU Ke-lin, RUI Yong-jun, SUN Zhen-zhong, LIU Jun

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

目的　比较两种方法治疗股骨干骨折合并较大游离骨块的效果差异。方法　选择66例股骨干骨折合并较大游离骨块行切开复位内固定治疗患者。按游离骨块处理方法不同分为对照组（35例，仅复位固定，未行钻孔和植骨）和试验组（35例,行钻孔、松质骨孔内插秧式植骨和周围植骨，以及复位固定）。比较两组的手术时间、手术出血量、骨折愈合时间、并发症发生情况和末次随访时临近关节功能恢复（HSS法）。结果　两组患者一般资料比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。对照组的手术出血(847.58±147.53) ml和手术时间(138.43±12.10) min优于试验组（分别752.18±143.78 ml和115.27±11.31 min），而试验组的骨折愈合时间（4.79±1.00 月）、骨延迟愈合（1/35）、骨不连（0）和内固定断裂（0）的发生率以及功能恢复（26/5/0/0）均优于对照组（分别为9.49±2.59 月，11/35，8/35，4/35和15/13/7/0），差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论　对于股骨干骨折合并较大游离骨块，仅复位固定的效果较差，而采用钻孔、松质骨植骨可以加快爬行替代愈合速度和改善骨折端的力学性能，骨折治疗效果明显优于前者。

Abstract

Objective　To compare the difference in effect of two methods g for treatment of large free bone block associated with femoral shaft fractures. Methods 66 cases of femoral shaft fractures with large free bone block treated by open reduction and internal fixation were selected.According to different methods for large free bone block,they were divided into control group(35 cases,treated without drilling and without bone grafting) and test group(35 cases,treated with drilling and cancellous bone grafting liking rice transplant in the holes and surrounding).The two groups were compared in terms of operation time,operative bleeding,healing time of fracture,morbidity of complications and functionary recovery of the adjacent joints(HSS’s criterion) at the last follow-up. Results The two groups were not significantly different in clinical data (P>0.05).The operation bleeding (847.58±147.53 ml) and operative time (138.43±12.10 min) in the control group were superior to those in the test group（752.18±143.78 ml and 115.27±11.31 min, respectively）, but the healing time of fracture（4.79±1.00 month）, the morbidity of delayed healing(1/35), nonunion (0) and broken of internal fixation (0)，as well as the functionary recovery in the test group were superior to those in the control group (9.49±2.59 month，11/35，8/35，4/35 and 15/13/7/0, respectively), the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05).　Conclusion　As for free bone block associated with femoral shaft fractures, simple reduction and fixation has unsatisfied result,but drilling and cancellous bone grafting can promote healing of creeping substitution and improve mechanical property in the fracture ends, the result is superior to that in the former.

导出引用

殷渠东，　顾三军，　徐可林，　芮永军，　孙振中，　刘军. 两种方法治疗股骨干骨折合并较大游离骨块的效果比较[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志. 2017, 35(1): 98-101 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2017.01.020

YIN Qu-dong, GU San-jun, XU Ke-lin, RUI Yong-jun, SUN Zhen-zhong, LIU Jun. Effect comparison of two methods for treatment of large free bone block associated with femoral shaft fractures[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy. 2017, 35(1): 98-101 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2017.01.020

参考文献

[1] 欧阳振华, 黄建荣, 向绪金,等. 带锁髓内钉在股骨干骨折翻修术应用研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2010,28(4): 458-460.
[2] 赵益峰, 朱凤华, 查玉梅, 等. 股骨干骨折髓内钉固定术后不愈合[J].中华创伤骨科杂志, 2013, 15(11):1003-1004.
[3] 魏俊强, 刘利蕊, 潘进社, 等. 仰卧位与侧卧位闭合复位髓内钉内固定治疗股骨干骨折的疗效比较[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2013,15(8):660-665.
[4] 毛玉江, 武长江, 孙林, 等. 股骨干骨折钢板内固定失效更换髓内钉固定的改良手术方法[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志， 2012,14(11):964-967.
[5] 徐可林, 殷渠东, 顾三军, 等. 四肢骨折不同固定物治疗后发生骨不连的局部因素分析[J].中国组织工程研究, 2012, 52(52):9761-9765.
[6] Metsemakers WJ, Roels N, Belmans A, et al. Risk factors for nonunion after intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures: Remaining controversies[J]. Injury, 2015, 39(2): 255-261.
[7] 宋财, 梁西俊, 刘向阳, 等. 带锁髓内钉和动力加压钢板内固定修复股骨干骨折后骨不连的比较[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2015,19(35): 5663-5668.
[8] 王秋根, 高堪达, 高伟, 等. 下肢髓内钉术后非感染性骨不连的对策:内植骨结合阻挡钉技术[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志，2008,16(14):1045-1047.
[9] 张世明, 李海丰, 黄轶刚. 骨折分类与功能评定[M]. 北京：人民军医出版社, 2008：333-334.
[10]翟文亮, 丁真奇, 练克俭, 等. 骨干骨折压力侧皮质缺损钢板内固定的生物力学研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2003, 21(6):624-626.
[11]Bullens PH, Bart Schreuder HW, de Waal Malefijt MC, et al. Is an impacted morselized graft in a cage an alternative for reconstructing segmental diaphyseal defects [J] ? Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2009, 467(3):783-791.　

[12] 郑小飞, 黄华扬, 丁焕文, 等. 大块同种异体骨移植重建骨肿瘤巨大骨缺损78例[J]. 中国组织工程研究与临床康复, 2009, 13(15): 2978-2983.
[13] 杨小彬, 胡蕴玉, 徐建强, 等. 同种异体骨复合带血管自体骨移植修复大段骨缺损的实验研究[J]. 中国骨肿瘤骨病, 2009, 8（1):35-38.
[14] 王松, 秧荣昆, 张培琴, 等. 大段同种异体骨移植重建四肢骨大段骨缺失[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2008, 16(22):1751-1754.
[15]杜辉, 付勤. 同种异体骨移植与自体骨移植修复四肢粉碎性骨折: 骨性愈合及骨活性比较[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2015, 19(8):1206-1210.
[16] 冯仕明, 高顺红, 焦成. 同种异体骨移植的研究进展[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2011, 19(21):1797-1799.
[17]迟志永, 张承敏, 王岩. 自体皮质骨作为骨移植材料治疗股骨缺损膝关节功能恢复疗效评价[J].中国临床康复, 2004, 8(5):826-827.
[18]Chen GF, Badshah SA, Li M, et al. Resection,cryosurgical ablation by means of cryoprobe and re-implantion in limb salvage for osteosarcoma of femur:a case report and review of literature[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2014, 22(13):1234-1241.