C7棘突的体表定位观测及其临床意义

张磊; 周鑫; 祁冀; 张少群; 汪国友; 扶世杰; 李义凯

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2016.06.004

中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6) : 615-618. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2016.06.004

应用解剖

C7棘突的体表定位观测及其临床意义

张磊^1,2 ，　周鑫¹，　祁冀²，　张少群²，　汪国友¹，　扶世杰¹，　李义凯²

作者信息 +

Positioning surface observation of C7 spinous process and clinical significance

ZHANG Lei ^1,2, ZHOU Xin¹, QI Ji², ZHANG Shao-qun², WANG Guo-you¹, FU Shi-jie¹, LI Yi-kai²

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

目的　研究健康成年人C7棘突体表触诊定位的准确性，探讨其原因及临床意义。方法　选取健康成年志愿者500名（男性354名、女性146名），由3名骨科主治医师应用触诊法，对其进行C7棘突的体表定位并用铝片标记，再拍摄颈椎正侧位X线片，然后观察C7棘突的体表触诊定位准确率。同时，通过X线、CT三维重建测量C6、C7、T1棘突的长度，并对测量结果进行分析。结果　98.8%（494名）的被检者能通过体表触诊准确定位C7，1.2%（6名，均为男性）的被检者体表触诊定位于C6。在X线中，C6的棘突长度为(2.97±0.11) cm，C7为(3.16±0.16) cm，T1为(3.20±0.15) cm；在CT三维重建中，C6的棘突长度为(2.98±0.12) cm，C7为(3.18±0.17) cm，T1为(3.50±0.16) cm。无论是X线还是CT三维重建，三个椎体棘突长度都具有统计学差异（P<0.01），但两种影像学检查手段所测得的C6、C7、T1棘突长度不具有统计学差异（P>0.05）。结论　C7棘突的体表触诊定位方法受到多种因素的影响，可能存在一定的误差。临床可利用颈椎X线、CT等辅助方法确保其诊治的准确性、安全性。

Abstract

Objective　The aim of this study is to study the accuracy of C7 spinous process on palpation positioning of healthy adults, and to explore the causes and clinical significance.　Method　500 healthy adult volunteers (354 males and 146 females) were enrolled into this study. Three orthopedic physicians used palpation to locate the surface mark of the C7 spinous process with an aluminum sheet, and then the surface palpation positioning accuracy of the C7 spinous process was observed by cervical lateral X-ray. Meanwhile, the length of C6, C7 and T1 was measured by X-ray and CT 3D reconstruction, and the results were analyzed. Result 98.8% (494) of the subjects’ C7 could be accurately positioned through surface palpation, but surface palpation of 1.2% (six subjects were male) subjects was positioned in C6. In X-ray, the length of C6 spinous process was （2.97±0.11）cm, the length of C7 spinous process was （3.16±0.16）cm, the length of T1 spinous process was（3.20±0.15）cm; in CT 3D reconstruction, the length of C6 spinous process was （2.98±0.12）cm, the length of C7 spinous process was （3.18±0.17）cm, the length of T1 spinous process was （3.50±0.16）cm. In X-ray and CT 3D reconstruction, there was statistically significant difference (P< 0.01) in three vertebral spinous process length, but there wasn’t statistically significant difference (P> 0.05) in the length of C6, C7, T1 spinous process as measured by the two kinds of imaging examination. Conclusion The surface palpation positioning method of C7 spinous process was affected by many factors, so there may be some errors. X-ray, CT and other auxiliary methods can be used to ensure the accuracy and safety of clinical diagnosis and treatment.

导出引用

张磊,周鑫,祁冀,张少群,汪国友,扶世杰,李义凯. C7棘突的体表定位观测及其临床意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志. 2016, 34(6): 615-618 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2016.06.004

ZHANG Lei, ZHOU Xin, QI Ji, ZHANG Shao-qun, WANG Guo-you, FU Shi-jie, LI Yi-kai. Positioning surface observation of C7 spinous process and clinical significance[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy. 2016, 34(6): 615-618 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2016.06.004

参考文献

[1] Diepenmaat AC, van der Wal M F, de Vet HC, et al. Neck/shoulder, low Back, and arm pain in relation to computer use, physical activity, stress, and depression among Dutch adolescents[J]. Pediatrics, 2006, 117(2): 412-416.
[2] Fejer R, Hartvigsen J, Kyvik KO. Heritability of neck pain: a population-based study of 33,794 Danish twins[J]. Rheumatology, 2006, 45(5): 589-594.
[3] 李玉玲, 季成叶, 陆舜华, 等. 汉族双生子儿童体格发育指标的遗传效应[J]. 中华预防医学杂志, 2005, 39(5): 345-347.
[4] Pietilinen KH, Kaprio J, Rsnen M, et al. Genetic and environmental influences on the tracking of body size from birth to early adulthood[J]. Obes Res, 2002, 10(9): 875-884.
[5] Hensinger RN. Congenital anomalies of cervical spine[J]. Clinical Orthop Relat Res, 1991, 264(264): 16-19.
[6] Forterre F, Casoni D, Tomek A, et al. Congenital cervical kyphosis in two young sighthounds[J]. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol, 2015; 28(1): 73-78.
[7] Katsuura A, Hukuda S, Imanaka T, et al. Anterior cervical plate used in degenerative disease can maintain cervical lordosis[J]. Spinal Disord, 1996, 9(6): 470-476.
[8] 魏威, 廖胜辉, 韩颖. 非创伤性生理曲度变直与颈椎退变关系的生物力学研究[J]. 中华中医药学刊, 2011, 29(11): 2474-2476.
[9] 王震, 田纪伟. 颈椎后凸畸形的研究进展[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2009, 17(18): 1393-1396.
[10] 沈晓龙, 田野, 东人, 等. 青少年特发性颈椎后凸畸形的影像学特征及其临床指导意义[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2011, 21(9): 745-749.
[11] 房敏, 姜淑云, 洪水棕, 等. 颈伸肌群对颈椎间盘和小关节内压力变化的影响[J]. 中国组织工程研究与临床康复, 2008, 12(15): 2847-2850.
[12] Kim JT, Lee HJ, Choi DY, et al. Sequential alignment change of the cervical spine after anterior cervica discectomy and fusion in the lowercervical spine[J]. Eur Spine J. 2016: 1-10.
[13] Riesenburger RI, Safain MG, Ogbuji R, et al. A novel classification system of lumbar disc degeneration[J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2014, 22(2): 346-51.
[14] Kim CH, Shin KH, Chung CK. Changes in cervical sagittal alignment after single-level posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical diskectomy[J]. Global Spine J, 2015, 5(1): 31-38.
[15] White NA, Danelson KA, Gayzik FS, et al. Head and neck response of a finite element anthropomorphic test device and human body model during a simulated rotary-wing aircraft impact[J]. J Biomech Eng, 2014, 136(11).
[16] 李凤辉, 马祖彬, 苑卉, 等. 论肩井穴功效及临床应用[J]. 山东中医药大学学报, 2016, 40(1): 21-23.
[17] 马荣, 暴宏伶. 大椎穴刺血拔罐治疗痤疮102例[J]. 中国针灸, 1994, (5): 46.
[18] 杜玉茱, 贾春生, 王建岭. 基于数据挖掘的刺络放血疗法治疗痤疮规律与特点研究[J]. 针刺研究, 2015, 40(3): 251-257.
[19] 李义凯, 叶淦湖, 刘晓华, 等. 颈椎棘突的形态学特征及在颈部推拿中的临床意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2003, 21(1): 25-26.
[20] 张少杰, 史君, 刘萨日娜,等. 青少年颈椎棘突的形态特征:与成人干燥骨标本比较[J]. 中国组织工程研究与临床康复, 2010, 14(35): 6578-6580.
[21] 高秀来. 系统解剖学[M]. 北京: 北京大学医学出版社, 第3版, 2013: 16.