中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2016, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 289-292.doi: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2016.03.011

• 断层影像解剖 • 上一篇    下一篇

数控机床金属导板辅助无牙颌种植的实验研究

徐楚1,2, 吴补领2, 李鉴轶1, 白宇哲3, 宋颖1, 马立超4, 唐雷1   

  1. 1.南方医科大学人体解剖学教研室 广东省医学生物力学重点实验室,  广州   510515; 2.南方医科大学
    口腔医学院,  广州   510515; 3.中国人民解放军总医院第一附属医院四肢修复重建外科,  北京   100048;
    4.南方医科大学附属南方医院影像中心,  广州   510515
  • 收稿日期:2016-04-04 出版日期:2016-05-25 发布日期:2016-06-17
  • 通讯作者: 唐雷,高级工程师,Tel:020-62789091,E-mail: cdheg@126.com
  • 作者简介:徐楚(1988-),女,江苏徐州人,在读硕士,主要从事口腔数字医学研究,Email:dahliacat@me.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金重大项目(61190120,61190122,61190123)

The experimental study on edentulous mandible implantation assisted by metal surgical guides based on computer numerical control technology

XU Chu 1,2, WU Bu-ling 2, LI Jian-yi1, BAI Yu-zhe3, SONG Ying1, MA Li-chao4, TANG Lei1   

  1. 1. Department of Anatomy, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Biomechanics, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China; 2. School of Stomatology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515; 3. Department of Limbs Repair and Regeneration Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of the PLAGeneral Hospital, Beijing, 100048, China; 4. Diagnostic Imaging Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China
  • Received:2016-04-04 Online:2016-05-25 Published:2016-06-17

摘要:

目的 探讨利用数控机床(computer numerical control, CNC)制造个性化下颌无牙颌金属种植导板的新方法。  方法 8具下颌无牙颌标本随机分为两组,分别运用CNC技术加工出金属导板、运用快速成型(rapid prototyping, RP)技术加工出树脂导板并测量其在体外实验中辅助置钉的精确性。  结果 CNC与RP导板在下颌骨中部水平面上的绝对偏差分别为(0.23±0.14) mm、(1.01±0.27) mm,差异有统计学意义(P=0.000);在矢状面上分别为(0.30±0.24) mm、(0.95±0.24) mm,差异有统计学意义(P=0.000)。  结论 在体外实验中,CNC金属下颌无牙颌种植导板辅助种植精确性高于RP树脂导板。

关键词: 数控机床, 下颌无牙颌, 种植导板, 计算机辅助设计

Abstract:

Objective To explore a new method for manufacturing customized edentulous mandible metal implant surgical guides using computernumerical control (CNC) machines. Methods Eight corpse edentulous mandibles were randomly divided into two groups, CNC metal guides and rapid prototyping (RP) resin guides were manufactured respectively. All guides were used to assist edentulous mandible implantations to analyze the accuracy in vitro. Results The absolute deviation on horizontal plane was (0.23±0.14) mm in the CNC group and (1.01±0.27) mm in the RP group, respectively, between which the difference was significant (P=0.000). The absolute deviation on sagittal plane was (0.30±0.24) mm in the CNC group and (0.95±0.24) mm in the RP group, respectively, between which the difference was significant (P=0.000). Conclusions In vitro implantations, CNC surgical guides assisted implantations have higher accuracy than RP guides.

Key words:  CNC machine, Edentulous mandible, Implant surgical guide, Computer aided design