骶骨第1椎弓根倾斜角与耳状面形态的相关性研究
The correlation between the inclination of S1 pedicles and morphology of auricular surface of sacrum
目的 研究骶骨第1椎弓根倾斜角与骶骨耳状面解剖形态的相关性,为骶髂关节骨折脱位经皮骶髂螺钉固定提供解剖学依据。 方法 42块干燥成人骶骨,在大体标本和X线影像上分别测量耳状面和第1椎弓根的相关参数,并分析他们之间的相关性。 结果 耳状面上、下半长轴长比值R1为0.86±0.15,根据其大小可将耳状面分为L型(R1>1)和f型(R1<1)。第1椎弓根倾斜角θ为(25.72±6.69)°,R1与θ呈负相关。 结论 当第1椎弓根倾斜角较小时,其耳状面多为L型,建议手术螺钉的进钉点偏下、小角度向内上;当第1椎弓根倾斜角较大时,其耳状面多为f型,建议手术螺钉的进针点偏上、大角度向内上。
Objective In order to provide anatomic basis for percutaneous fixation using sacroiliac screw by analyzing the correlation between the inclination of S1 pedicles and morphology of auricular surface of sacrum was investigated. Methods The relevant parameters of S1 pedicles and auricular surface were measured in 42 dry adult sacra respectively, then the correlation of the parameters was analyzed statistically. Results The ratio (R1) of long axis of the upper part and the lower part was 0.86±0.15. According to the value of R1, the auricular surface was classified into two types, type L (R1>1) and f (R1<1). The inclination of S1 pedicles (θ) was (25.72±6.69)°, and the ratio R1 was correlated negatively with inclination θ. Conclusion When the inclination of S1 pedicles is small, the auricular surface is type L, suggesting optimal angle of screw of S1 pedicle is smaller and the optimal point of surgical screws should be lower. When the inclination of S1 pedicles is larger, the auricular surface is type f, suggesting optimal angle of screw of S1 pedicle is larger and the optimal point of surgical screws should be higher.
Sacral auricular surface / S1 pedicle / Correlation / Fixation of sacroiliac joint
[1] Templeman DC, Simpson T, Matta JM, et al. Surgical management of pelvic ring injuries[J]. Instr Course Lect, 2005, 54:395-400.
[2] Routt ML Jr, Simonian PT. Closed reduction and percutaneous skeletal fixation of sacral fractures[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1996, 329:121-128.
[3] Hinsche AF, Giannoudis PV, Smith RM, et al. Fluoroscopy-based multiplanar image guidance for insertion of sacroiliac screws[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2002, 395:135-144.
[4] Abitbol MM. Evolution of the lumbosacral angle[J]. Am J Phys Anthropol, 1987, 72(3):361–372.
[5] Abitbol MM. Evolution of the sacrum in hominoids[J]. Am J Phys Anthropol, 1987, 74(1):65-81.
[6] Peleg S, Dar G, Medlej B, et al. Orientation of the human sacrum: anthropological perspectives and methodological approaches[J]. Am J Phys Anthropol, 2007, 133(3):967-977.
[7] Pal GP, Routal RV. Relationship between the articular surface area of a bone and the magnitude of stress passing through it[J]. Anat Rec, 1991, 230(4):570-574.
[8] 阮默,徐达传,汪新民,等. 经皮骶髂螺钉内固定术的应用解剖学研究 [J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志,2006,24(5):479-484.
[9] Ebraheim NA, Xu R, Biyani A, et al. Morphologic considerations of the first sacral pedicle for iliosacral screw placement[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1997, 22(8):841-846.
[10] Zheng Y, Lu WW, Zhu Q, et al. Variation in bone mineral density of the sacrumin young adults and its significance for sacral10 fixation[J]. Spine, 2000, 25(3):353-357.
[11] Williams PL. Sacrum and lumbosacral joints[M]//Gray's Anatomy. London, Churchill Livingstone, 1995, 531–533.
[12] 庄礼尚, 曾庆余. 骶骨耳状面倾斜度及相关径线[J]. 汕头大学医学院学报, 1992, 1:21-26.
[13] Krmek N, Jo-Osvati? A, Nikoli? T, et al. Antropological measurement of the sacroiliac joint[J]. Coll Antropol, 2006, 30(4):811-814.
第二军医大学创新能力培养计划(MS2013032)
/
〈 |
|
〉 |