猪胆总管脱细胞基质构建组织工程胆管的生物力学评价

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2015.05.015

中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 553-557.doi: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2015.05.015

猪胆总管脱细胞基质构建组织工程胆管的生物力学评价

李文春，　李静，　唐杰，　张亮，　王飞虎，　陈秀英

湖北医药学院人体解剖学教研室，湖北十堰　442000

收稿日期:2015-04-23 出版日期:2015-09-25 发布日期:2015-10-13
作者简介:李文春（1964-），男，湖北十堰人，博士，硕士生导师，二级教授，从事生物力学与组织工程研究，Tel:13972465845，E-mail:wenchunli@hbmu.edu.cn
基金资助:
湖北省自然科学基金项目（2014CFB649）；十堰市科技局项目（14Y06）；湖北医药学院研究生启动金项目（2013QDJZR07）

Biomechanical evaluation of decellularized porcine bile duct for the construction of bile duct by tissue engineering

LI Wen-chun, LI Jing, TANG Jie, ZHANG Liang, WANG Fei-hu, CHEN Xiu-ying

Department of Anatomy, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan 442000, China

Received:2015-04-23 Online:2015-09-25 Published:2015-10-13

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　用不同的脱细胞方法对猪胆总管进行处理，比较脱细胞前后的生物力学变化，筛选适宜的脱细胞方法，为组织工程胆管支架材料的应用提供理论依据。方法　30例猪胆总管，随机分为5组，A组：对照组， B组：0.05 % 胰蛋白酶+核酸酶，C组：0.1 % SDS+核酸酶，D组：1.0 % Triton X-100+核酸酶，E组：1.0 % Triton X-100+0.1 % SDS +核酸酶。在Test Resources生物力学试验机上进行加载一卸载试验和极限抗张强度试验。计算出生物力学材料常数（α1、β1、α2、β2）、弹性模量、极限抗张强度和断裂伸长率等指标。结果　Ｄ组、Ｅ组的生物力学材料常数（α1、β1、α2、β2）与A组的差异无统计学意义（F = 12.21, P = 0.06），Ｂ组、C组比A组、D组和Ｅ组的小（P < 0.01）；Ｄ组、Ｅ组的弹性模量比A组的稍增大，但差异不明显（P > 0.05），Ｂ组、C组比A组的小（P < 0.05）；Ｄ组、Ｅ组的UTS值和SOF值与A组差异不明显（P > 0.05）；B组、C组的UTS值明显小于A组（P < 0.05），SOF值明显大于A组（P < 0.05）。结论应用1.0 % Triton X-100+核酸酶和1.0 % Triton X-100+0.1 % SDS +核酸酶的脱细胞效果好，且不会影响猪胆总管的生物力学特性，是一种比较理想的猪胆总管脱细胞方法。

关键词: 胆总管, 生物力学, 组织工程, 支架材料, 猪

Abstract:

Objective The porcine common bile ducts were treated with different acellular matrix, the biomechanical change of porcine common bile ducts before and after acellular matrix treatment were evaluated, and an appropriate acellular matrix was explored to provide theoretical basis for the application of bile duct scaffold materials for tissue engineering.　Methods　Thirty porcine common bile ducts were divided into 5 groups randomly, group A: control group, group B: 0.05% trypsin + nuclease, group C:0.1% SDS + nuclease, group D: 1.0% triton X-100 + nuclease, group E: 1.0% triton X-100 + 0.1% SDS + nuclease. The loading - unloading experiment and ultimate tensile strength experiment were performed using TestResources biomechanical tester. Indexes such as biomechanical material constant (α1, β1, α2, β2), elastic modulus, ultimate tensile strength (UTS) and breaking elongation rate were calculated.　Results　There were no statistical differences in the biomechanical material constants (α1, β1,α2, β2) of the common bile ducts between group A and two acellular matrix treatment groups D and E (F = 12.21, P = 0.06). The biomechanical material constants of group B and group D were lower than that of group A, group C and group E (P < 0.01). The elastic module of common bile ducts of the two acellular matrix treatment groups D and E were a little larger than that of group A, but without significant difference (P>0.05)，the levels of group B and group C were lower than that of group A (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in UTS value and SOF value between the acellular matrix treatment groups D, E, and group A (P > 0.05). The UTS value of acellular matrix treatment groups B and C was significantly lower than that of group A (P<0.05), and the SOF value was significantly higher than that of group A (P<0.05).　Conclusion　The acellular matrix treatment effect of 1.0% Triton X - 100 + nuclease and 1.0% Triton X - 100 + 0.1% SDS + nuclease was quite satisfactory, and the biomechanical characteristics of porcine common bile duct were not affected, therefore, it is an ideal acellular method for porcine common bile ducts.

Key words: Common bile duct, Biomechanics, Tissue engineering, Scaffold-like material;　Pig

李文春，　李静，　唐杰，　张亮，　王飞虎，　陈秀英. 猪胆总管脱细胞基质构建组织工程胆管的生物力学评价[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2015, 33(5): 553-557.

参考文献

[1] Tao L, Li Q, Ren H, Chen B, et al. Repair of extrahepatic bile duct defect using a collagen patch in a swine model [J]. Artif Organs, 2015, 39(4):352-360.
[2] Sankaran KK, Subramanian A, Krishnan UM, et al. Nanoarchitecture of scaffolds and endothelial cells in engineering small diameter vascular grafts [J]. Biotechnol J, 2015, 10(1):96-108.
[3] 李静, 王配军, 李文春. 猪胆管作为人胆管移植替代材料的生物力学评价 [J]. 湖北医药学院学报, 2013, 32(5): 397-402．
[4] Li WC, Zhang HM, Li J, et al. Comparison of biomechanical properties of bile duct between pigs and humans for liver xenotransplant [J]. Transplant Proc, 2013, 45(2):741-747.
[5] Fallahiarezoudar E, Ahmadipourroudposht M, Idris A, et al. A review of: Application of synthetic scaffold in tissue engineering heart valves [J]. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2015, 48C:556-565.
[6] 杨立信，徐志云，黄盛东，等. 三种去细胞方法构建的猪主动脉瓣膜支架的性能比较[J].第二军医大学学报, 2007, 28(1):8-12.
[7] 姜宗来，何光篪.人冠状动脉的生物力学特性Ⅰ.一维载荷下的应力-应变关系 [J]. 第三军医大学学报, 1989,11(4):241-247.
[8] 张一飞，黄铁柱，张兴华, 等. 人与猪升主动脉一维载荷下的生物力学特性[J]. 郧阳医学院学报, 2004, 23(2):68-71.
[9] Pérez Alonso AJ, Del Olmo Rivas C, Machado Romero I, et al. Bile duct reconstruction using 3-dimensional collagen tubes [J]. Cir Esp, 2013, 91(9):590-594.
[10]Samouillan V, Dandurand-Lods J, Lamure A, et al. Thermal analysis characterization of aortic tissues for cardiac valve bioprostheses [J]. J Biomed Mater Res, 1999, 46(4):531-538.
[11] Somers P, De Somer F, Cornelissen M, et al. Decellularization of heart valve matrices: search for the ideal balance [J]. Artif Cells Blood Substit Immobil Biotechnol, 2012, 40(1-2):151-162.
[12] Tao Y, Hu T, Wu Z, Tang H, et al. Heparin nanomodification improves biocompatibility and biomechanical stability of decellularized vascular scaffolds [J]. Int J Nanomedicine, 2012, 7:5847-5858.
[13]Schaner PJ, Martin ND, Tulenko TN, et al. Decellularized vein as a potential scaffold for vascular tissue engineering [J]. J Vasc Surg, 2004, 40(1):146-153.
[14] 孙龙, 池一凡, 林明山,等.猪主动脉脱细胞血管基质制备[J].中国比较医学杂志, 2008,18(8): 65-66.

[1]	李笑予, 张磊, 付磊, 李东波, 汪国友. 三步接骨法治疗Sanders Ⅱ型跟骨骨折的有限元研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 65-70.
[2]	吴研飞, 马剑雄, 卢斌, 王颖, 柏豪豪, 靳洪震, 马信龙. CT后处理技术重建CT值与终板抗压强度的相关性研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 71-76.
[3]	张悦, 蔡兴博, 张必欢, 王斌, 徐永清. 全腕关节置换术后腕关节生物力学研究进展[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 112-114.
[4]	欧阳北平, 马向阳, 罗春山, 邹小宝, 梁栋柱, 陆廷盛, 陈啟鸰. 钉尾横连与棒-棒横连在后路寰枢椎固定中的生物力学对比研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2023, 41(5): 588-592.
[5]	王德昌, 龚浙溢, 廖承浩, 支沙沙, 邹旭菲, 胡耀辉, 王凯, 娄阳云, 李婷. 新鲜猪心房室传导轴的显微解剖[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2023, 41(3): 254-257.
[6]	林文杰, 孙欣, 黄文华, 魏波, 林涛, 梁振明, 钟环, 张欣, 欧阳汉斌. 踝关节融合术后后足关节生物力学分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2023, 41(2): 212-217.
[7]	马洪峰, 任庆, 郑末, 程万民, 廉梅. 脂肪间充质干细胞聚合物-细胞外基质复合物补片修复兔外耳道全层皮肤损伤的实验研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2022, 40(6): 704-709.
[8]	童杰, 季伟, 黄志平, 周若舟, 房佐忠, 朱青安. 枕颈区后路柔性动态固定的生物力学研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2022, 40(3): 315-319.
[9]	仝铃, 许阳阳, 王一丹, 马渊, 王海燕, 李筱贺. 颈椎前路微型记忆加压合金板的有限元分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2022, 40(3): 320-326.
[10]	童杰, 季伟, 黄志平, 周若舟, 房佐忠, 朱青安. 寰枢椎后路柔性固定的生物力学研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2022, 40(1): 72-77.
[11]	余盛, 庞清江. 颈椎间孔韧带的解剖特点及其临床意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2022, 40(1): 109-112.
[12]	王高飞, 张珠峰, 魏壮. V-Y延长指背腱膜终腱止点重建术治疗陈旧性锤状指的生物力学实验研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2021, 39(3): 330-335.
[13]	张向南, 邓伟, 张松强, 李雷, 周广良, 居发新, 鞠文, 周正虎, 李关兴, 巨积辉, 侯瑞兴. 猪股骨头支持带动脉入头分支的解剖学研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2021, 39(2): 130-133.
[14]	杨诚, 李祯, 廖坚文, 樊仕才, 杨健, 白晓春. 基于柠檬酸合成的新型可降解螺钉生物相容性和生物力学特性的研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2021, 39(2): 182-186.
[15]	李娜, 柳茵, 熊鲲, 宾时珍. 外伤后脑血肿对颅内压分布的力学分析研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2019, 37(6): 673-679.

猪胆总管脱细胞基质构建组织工程胆管的生物力学评价

Biomechanical evaluation of decellularized porcine bile duct for the construction of bile duct by tissue engineering

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0