可视喉镜在解剖结构异常的困难气道脑动脉瘤栓塞术患者的应用
Application of video laryngoscopy in patients an abnormal anatomy in airway who suffer cerebral aneurysm embolization
目的 评价UE可视喉镜在解剖结构异常的困难气道脑动脉瘤栓塞术患者气管插管的临床应用价值。 方法 20例脑动脉瘤栓塞术的患者, ASAII~III级,Mallampati气道分级Ⅲ~IV级,随机分为UE可视喉镜组(A组)和Macintosh直视喉镜组(B组),每组10例。记录两组患者插管时间,插管成功率,气管插管前(T0)、置入气管导管时min(T1)、置入气管导管后1min(T2)、3min(T3)和5min(T4)的Sp02、HR、SBP及DBP,以及气管插管不良反应的发生情况。 结果 T1、T2和T3时B组的HR、SBP及DBP高于A组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);T4时B组患者HR、SBP及DBP高于A组,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A组患者插管时间显著低于B组患者,总的不良反应发生率A组显著低于B组。 结论 UE可视喉镜可减轻解剖结构异常的困难气道脑动脉瘤栓塞术患者气管插管时的应激反应,能有效保障患者围麻醉期的安全。
Objective To evaluate application of videolaryngoscopy in patients with an abnormal anatomy in airway who suffer cerebral aneurysm embolization. Methods 30 patients suffered emergency cerebral aneurysm embolization, ASA II or III, and with Mallampati airway (grade III~IV), were randomly divided into two groups: UE videolaryngoscopy (group A, n=15) and Macintosh direct laryngoscopy (group B, n=15). Tracheal intubation time, success rate of intubation, SpO2, HR, SBP and DBP: before tracheal intubation(T0),tracheal intubation(T1),1(T2)、3(T3)and 5(T4) minutes after tracheal intubation were investigated. The adverse reactions were also recorded during tracheal intubation. Results HR、SBP、DBP and PaCO2 in group B were higher at T1, T2,T3 than group A (P<0.05). HR,SBP and DBP in group B were higher at T4 than group A (P>0.05). Tracheal intubation time in group B was longer than group A. The ratio of adverse reactions in group A was lower than group B. Conclusion UE videolaryngoscopy can reduce stress reactions of tracheal intubation in patients with an abnormal anatomy in airway who suffer cerebral aneurysm embolization, and effectively protect the safety of patients around anesthetic time.
Videolaryngoscopy / Anatomical structure / Difficult airway / Cerebral aneurysm embolization
[1] 孙怡,龙瑞春,赵国栋.Shikani可视喉镜与McCoy喉镜对气管插管应激反应影响的比较[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2014,30(11): 1052-1055.
[2] Ezri T, Szmuk P, Warters D, et al. Tracheal intubation in obesepatients[J].Anesth Analg, 2004,98(1):272.
[3] 王瑛,王蕾,刘良田,等.喉罩与气管插管在颅内动脉瘤介入手术全麻中的对比观察[J].内蒙古医学院学报,2010,32(1): 49-50.
[4] Lakhani S,Guha A,Nahser HC.Anaesthesia for endovascular management of cerebral aneurysms[J].European Journal of Anaesthsiology,2006,23(11): 902-913.
[5] 史艳燕,鲍磊,赵彬,等.可视喉镜经口明视插管对老年高血压病患者血流动力学的影响[J].实用医学杂志,2014,30(2): 269-271.
[6] Pieters B,van Zundert A,Lee R.Measurement of forces during direct laryngoscopy and videolaryngoscopy [J].Anaesthesia,2012,67(10): 1182-1183.
[7] 刘红,赵国栋,龙瑞春,等.Shikani可视喉镜对老年患者气管插管时应激反应的影响[J].广东医学,2013,34(14): 2180-2182.
[8] 江伟,杨建平,叶流,等.McCoy喉镜三种用法在困难气道中的声门显露程 度比较[J].中国急救医学,2012,32(10): 951-952.
[9] Russell T,Khan S,Elaman J,et al.Measurement of forces applied during Macintosh direct laryngoscopy compared with GlideScope® videolaryngoscopy[J].Anaesthesia,2012,67(6): 626- 631.
[10] 安宁,陈敏,刘萍,等.HC可视喉镜、GlideScope视频喉镜和Macintosh直接喉镜在颈椎制动患者气管插管中的比较[J].华中科技大学学报(医学版), 2013,42(8): 405-408.
广东省深圳市科技创新委员会资助项目(JCYJ2014 0416122812031)
/
〈 |
|
〉 |