包含种植体下颌骨颏部受力的有限元分析

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2015.04.020

中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 464-467.doi: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2015.04.020

包含种植体下颌骨颏部受力的有限元分析

张政¹，　刘阳²，　毕振宇³

1. 江汉油田总医院口腔科，湖北潜江 433124；　2. 深圳市龙华新区人民医院口腔科，深圳 518109；
3. 南方医科大学人体解剖教研室，广东省医学生物力学重点实验室，广州 510515

收稿日期:2014-11-10 出版日期:2015-07-25 发布日期:2015-08-14
通讯作者: 毕振宇，医学博士，讲师，E-mail：lybimail@126.com
作者简介:张政（1976-），男，湖北人，副主任医师，主要从事口腔临床医学，E-mail：1430310525@qq.com

Finite element analysis of the mandible with implant applied the force from chin

ZHANG Zheng¹，LIU Yang²，BI Zhen-yu³

1. Department of Stamatology, Jianghan Oil Field General Hospital, Qianjiang，Hubei 433124, China; 2. Department of Stamatology, People Hospital of Longhua new District，Shenzhen, Guangdong 518109，China；3. Department of Anatomy/Key Laboratory of Medical Biomenchanics Guangdong Province, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, China

Received:2014-11-10 Online:2015-07-25 Published:2015-08-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　通过对右侧下颌第1磨牙为种植牙的下颌骨，颏部给予100 N水平力作用的有限元分析，揭示种植体对下颌骨应力传导的影响。方法　利用CT图像，建立缺失第1磨牙的下颌骨和种植牙的三维有限元模型，保持下颌骨的边界约束，给予颏部100 N的水平外力作用，分析下颌第1磨牙种植牙区域应力变化和整体下颌骨的应力变化。结果　颏部受到水平外力100 N作用后，右侧第1磨牙种植区域断面应力变化：10.37 mm与86.38 mm位置出现应力最低，其最大应力峰值分别为9.005 Pa、9.067 Pa；52.97 mm位置处出现应力最大，应力的峰值94.962 Pa。左侧第1磨牙断面应力变化：10.82 mm与83.82 mm位置出现应力最低，其最大应力峰值分别为18.227 Pa、8.867 Pa；54.66 mm位置处出现应力最大，应力的峰值93.912 Pa。下颌骨的整体应力变化：颏部受力部位最大，最大的应力峰值为260.524 Pa。结论　一定条件下第1磨牙位置的种植体植入不影响下颌骨的正常下颌骨的应力传导。

关键词: 下颌骨, 颏部, 种植体, 有限元

Abstract:

Objectives　To investigate the force effect of implant in the mandible, the stress changes of the mandible and the first molar for mandibular dental implants were analyzed with finite element method when the chin was impacted with 100N horizontal force.　Methods　The finite element models of mandible missing the first molar and the dental implants were established with CT data of a man head. The mandibular boundary constraints were built, and the chin was impacted with 100N horizontal force. The stress change of the whole mandible and the regional of mandibular first molar dental implants were recorded and observed. Results　After the 100N external force being imposed on the mentum, stress changes showed that the lowest values on the section area of the right implant were 9.005 Pa in 10.82 mm and 9.067 Pa in 86.38mm, and the maximum stress was 94.962 Pa in 52.97 mm. For the left first molar, the changes showed that the lowest values were 18.227 Pa in 10.37 mm and 8.867 Pa in 83.82 mm, and the maximum stress was 93.912 Pa in 54.66 mm. The stress change of the overall mandibule recorded showed that the mentum stress area was the largest, with peak reaching 260.524 Pa.　Conclusion　The implant of first molar does not affect the normal mechanical behavior of mandible.

Key words: Mandible, Chin, Implant, Finite element

张政,刘阳,毕振宇. 包含种植体下颌骨颏部受力的有限元分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2015, 33(4): 464-467.

参考文献

[1] Eliášová P, Marek I, Kamínek M. Implant site development in the distal region of the mandible: bone formation and its stability over time[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2014, 145(3):333-340.
[2] Yoshino K, Ito K, Kuroda M, et al. Loss of teeth opposing implant-supported prostheses in the posterior mandible: a retrospective survey in dental clinics[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2014, 9(4):937-341.
[3] Dejak B, M?otkowski A, Langot C. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of molars with thin-walled prosthetic crowns made of various materials[J]. Dent Mater, 2012, 28(4):433-441.
[4] Ormianer Z, Palti A, Demiralp B, et al. Implant-supported first molar restorations: correlation of finite element analysis with clinical outcomes[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2012 , 27(1):e1-12.
[5] Caillet eau JG, Rieger MR, Edakin J. A comparison of intracanal stresses in a post restored tooth utilizing the finite element method[J]. J Endod, 1992, 18(11): 540-554.
[6] Annibali S, Bignozzi I, Iacovazzi L, et al. Immediate, early, and late implant placement in first-molar sites: a retrospective case series[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011, 26(5):1108-1122.
[7] Kim SG, Solomon C. Cost-effectiveness of endodontic molar retreatment compared with fixed partial dentures and single-tooth implant alternatives[J]. J Endod. 2011, 37(3):321-325.
[8] Desai SR, Karthikeyan I, Gaddale R. 3D finite element analysis of immediate loading of single wide versus double implants for replacing mandibular molar[J]. J Indian Soc Periodontol, 2013, 17(6):777-783.
[9] Lee HJ, Lee KS, Kim MJ, et al. Effect of bite force on orthodontic mini-implants in the molar region: Finite element analysis[J]. Korean J Orthod, 2013, 43(5): 218-224.
[10] Seker E, Ulusoy M, Ozan O, et al. Biomechanical effects of different fixed partial denture designs planned on bicortically anchored short, graft-supported long, or 45-degree-inclined long implants in the posterior maxilla: a three-dimensional finite element analysis[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2014, 29(1):e1-9.
[11] Rismanchian M, Dakhilalian M, Bajoghli F, et al. Implant-retained mandibular bar-supported overlay dentures: a finite element stress analysis of four different bar heights[J]. J Oral Implantol, 2012, 38(2):133-139.
[12] Tuijt M, Koolstra JH, Lobbezoo F, et al. Differences in loading of the temporomandibular joint during opening and closing of the jaw[J]. J Biomech, 2010, 43(6):1048-1054.

[1]	李笑予, 张磊, 付磊, 李东波, 汪国友. 三步接骨法治疗Sanders Ⅱ型跟骨骨折的有限元研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 65-70.
[2]	胡硕红, 郑学彬, 李富杰, 王鸿. 种植基台材料对种植体周围软硬组织影响的前瞻性临床研究[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 94-98.
[3]	张悦, 蔡兴博, 张必欢, 王斌, 徐永清. 全腕关节置换术后腕关节生物力学研究进展[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2024, 42(1): 112-114.
[4]	欧阳北平, 马向阳, 罗春山, 邹小宝, 陆廷盛, 陈啟鸰. 三维有限元对新型钉尾横连在后路寰枢椎内固定中的力学稳定性评价#br#[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2023, 41(6): 721-727.
[5]	洪丽婷, 孟庆国, 吴建辉, 徐凌雁, 高润泽, 翟丽东. 突入膀胱不同形态的前列腺增生的有限元分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2023, 41(4): 459-464.
[6]	林文杰, 孙欣, 黄文华, 魏波, 林涛, 梁振明, 钟环, 张欣, 欧阳汉斌. 踝关节融合术后后足关节生物力学分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2023, 41(2): 212-217.
[7]	张凯, 王一丹, 戴丽娜, 于静红, 张云凤, 金凤, 王海燕, 李筱贺, 温彦鑫, 温鑫, 樊建进, 谢宇轩, 倪敏, 张铁馨. 内蒙古地区成年人下颌骨三维CT测量及分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2022, 40(4): 404-409.
[8]	蔡昊, 周海波, 虞嘉欢, 胡凯, 孟洪明, 寿泽榆, 陈春, 白植标, . 空心螺钉联合“8”、“0”张力带钢丝内固定治疗髌骨横行骨折模型的有限元分析与比较[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2022, 40(4): 454-459.
[9]	郭津源, 杜原, 王桐月. 广东地区人群颞下颌关节解剖参数的三维分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2022, 40(3): 263-266.
[10]	仝铃, 许阳阳, 王一丹, 马渊, 王海燕, 李筱贺. 颈椎前路微型记忆加压合金板的有限元分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2022, 40(3): 320-326.
[11]	姚文君, 李才, 许刚, 叶雨辰, 朱坤, 王艳丽, 张长春. 重度骨质疏松条件下后路枢椎三种内固定方式的有限元分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2022, 40(2): 198-203.
[12]	魏明杰, 许育健, 吴一芃, 王腾, 吴欢, 袁礼波, 唐文宝, 郭孝菊, 徐永清. 手腕部不同载荷状态下舟月骨间韧带应力分布分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2021, 39(5): 586-592.
[13]	吴晓薇, 李鉴轶, 杜冰冉, 杨巧华, 范天成, 李路韬. 轻度青少年特发性脊柱侧凸有限元模型构建及分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2021, 39(4): 443-448.
[14]	林泽宇, 谢雨杉, 谢普生, 凌钦杰, 黄学成, 黄文华. 腰椎智能医学图像建模系统的构建及精度检验[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2020, 38(4): 444-449.
[15]	胡力达, 田广永, 徐飘, 林琼萍. 鼓膜-听骨链精细三维重建及谐响应有限元分析[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2019, 37(6): 680-685.

包含种植体下颌骨颏部受力的有限元分析

Finite element analysis of the mandible with implant applied the force from chin

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0