微创经肌间隙入路椎间孔椎体间融合术治疗下腰椎退变性疾病的评价

钟浩博; 孙春汉; 马晋; 刘伟乐; 陈楚群; 赖伟强; 杨剑锋

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2015.03.027

中国临床解剖学杂志 ›› 2015, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (3) : 357-359. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2015.03.027

临床研究

微创经肌间隙入路椎间孔椎体间融合术治疗下腰椎退变性疾病的评价

钟浩博，　孙春汉，　马晋，　刘伟乐，　陈楚群，　赖伟强，　杨剑锋

作者信息 +

Clinical study of minimally invasive spatium intermuscalare of multifidus for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

ZHONG Hao-bo， SUN Chun-han， MA Jin， LIU Wei-le， CHEN Chu-qun， LAI Wei-qiang， YANG Jian-feng

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

目的　报道经多裂肌间隙入路椎间孔椎间融合术治疗下腰椎退变性疾患的临床效果。方法　2010年4月至2012年4月对27例患者经多裂肌间隙入路椎间孔椎间融合术治疗下腰椎退变性疾病。其中男性12例，女性15例，年龄58.2岁（46~74岁）。极外侧型椎间盘突出7例，椎间盘开窗摘除术后复发3例，退变性腰椎不稳17例。结果　切口长度4.2 cm（4.0~4.5 cm），手术时间90 min（70~160 min），术中出血量130 ml（90~2500 ml）。随访8～20个月，无严重并发症，27例均获骨性融合。末次随访时患者VAS腿痛评分从术前平均(7.4±1.1)分降至(2.4±1.3)分，VAS腰痛评分从术前平均(6.7±1.3)分降至(1.8±1.5)分。临床疗效评定：优22例，良3例，可2例，优良率92.6%。结论　经多裂肌间隙入路椎间孔椎间融合术具有创伤小、时间短、出血少、并发症少、疗效确切等优点，在合理选择适应证的情况下是一种理想的下腰椎融合方法。

Abstract

Objective To explore the clinical outcome of through spatium intermuscalare of multifidus for transforaminallumbar interbody fusion. Methods From April 2010 to April 2012，27 patients underwent screw fixation plus transforaminallumbar interbody fusion through spatium intermusculareof multifidus. There were 12 males and 15 femaleswith the mean age of 58.2 years (range，46~74years). Among them 7 cases hadfar-lateral lumbardisc herniation，3 cases had post-discectomy recurrence，and 17 cases had degenerative instability. Results The average skin incision length was 4.2 cm (range，4.0~4.5 cm)，the average operative time was 90 min(range，70~160 min)，and the average blood loss was 130 ml (range，90~250 m1)．All cases were followed up for 8~20 months (average 13.6 months)．Postoperative radiography showed no evidenceof instrument failure，and all cases got bone fusion．At final followed-up the average leg pain VAS decreased from 7.4±1.1 preoperatively to 2.4±1.3 postoperatively，the averse low back pain VAS decreased from 6.7±1.3 preoperatively to 1.8±1.5 postoperatively． According to Nakai ncriterion，22 cases were rated asexcellent，3 cases as good，and 2 case as fair with the total excellent and good rate of 92.6％. Conclusions Transforaminallumbar interbody fusion through spatium intermusculareof multifidus has some advantages of minimal invasiveness，less blood loss，less complications and reliable curative effect．It is a satisfactory lumbarfusion method undersuitable indication．

导出引用

钟浩博,孙春汉,马晋,刘伟乐,陈楚群,赖伟强,杨剑锋. 微创经肌间隙入路椎间孔椎体间融合术治疗下腰椎退变性疾病的评价[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志. 2015, 33(3): 357-359 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2015.03.027

Clinical study of minimally invasive spatium intermuscalare of multifidus for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy. 2015, 33(3): 357-359 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2015.03.027

参考文献

[1] Harms J, Rolinger H. A one-stager procedure in operative treatment of spondylolistheses: dorsal traction-reposition and anterior fusion (author's transl)[J]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb, 1982,120(3):343-347.
[2] Ozgur BM, Yoo K, Rodriguez G, et al. Minimally-invasive technique for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)[J]. Eur Spine J, 2005, 14(9):887-894.
[3] Humphreys SC, Hodges SD, Patwardhan AG, et al. Comparison of posterior and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbody fusion[J]. Spine, 2001, 26(5):567-571.
[4] Javernick MA, Kuklo TR, Polly DJ. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: unilateral versus bilateral disk removal--an in vivo study[J]. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ), 2003, 32(7):344-348.
[5] Amin BY, Tu TH, Mummaneni PV. Mini-open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion[J]. Neurosurg Focus, 2013, 35(2 Suppl):2.
[6] Mummaneni PV, Haid RW, Rodts GE. Lumbar interbody fusion: state-of-the-art technical advances. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2004,1(1):24-30.

[7] Danneels LA, Vanderstraeten GG, Cambier DC, et al. CT imaging of trunk muscles in chronic low back pain patients and healthy control subjects[J]. Eur Spine J, 2000, 9(4):266-272.
[8] Stevens KJ, Spenciner DB, Griffiths KL, et al. Comparison of minimally invasive and conventional open posterolateral lumbar fusion using magnetic resonance imaging and retraction pressure studies[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2006,19(2):77-86.
[9] Kuriyama N, Ito H. Electromyographic functional analysis of the lumbar spinal muscles with low back pain[J]. J Nippon Med Sch, 2005,72(3):165-173.
[10] Hoh DJ, Wang MY, Ritland SL. Anatomic features of the paramedian muscle-splitting approaches to the lumbar spine[J]. Neurosurgery, 2010, 66(3 Suppl Operative):13-25.
[11] 杨明杰，李立钧，祝建光，等．数字化设计微创极外侧经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术[J]．中华骨科杂志，2011，31 ( 10) : 1093-1098．
[12] 姜晓幸,费琴明,王晓峰, 等.微创TLIF手术的手术方法和早期临床结果[J].中国临床医学,2006,13(4):642-644.
[13] 刘晓光.如何看待微创与传统开放TLIF手术开放腰椎椎体间融合手术过时了么 [J]？中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2014,24(5):388-390.
[14] 余可谊.腰椎微创TLIF不同内固定解决方案的有限元分析[D].北京协和医学院,2011.