人工腰椎间盘置换术后上位关节突关节内应力变化的研究
Stress changes in superior facet joint after artificial lumbar disc replacement
目的 研究人工腰椎间盘置换术对上位相邻节段关节突关节内应力（FS）的影响，并与腰椎融合术进行比较，为人工腰椎间盘的临床应用提供理论依据。 方法 选取6具新鲜成人尸体的腰骶段（L2~S1）标本，将每具标本依次制作成L4/5椎间盘完整（对照组）、L4/5椎间盘置换和L4/5椎间融合模型，并依次进行生物力学实验，将压力传感器置入L3/4关节突关节，以400 N的恒定轴向载荷，±7.5 Nm的力矩模拟生理状态下轴向、后伸和左右侧弯4种运动，分别测量3种模型在各种运动下L3/4关节突关节内压力。 结果 在模拟生理载荷的各种运动下，人工椎间盘置换组与椎间盘完整组相比较，上位关节突关节内压力差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05），而腰椎间融合组相对于椎间盘完整组和人工椎间盘置换组，上位关节突关节内压力均显著增加，差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。 结论 人工腰椎间盘置换术后，上位相邻节段关节突关节内压力与正常腰椎相比无明显改变，而腰椎间融合术后，上位相邻节段关节突关节内压力则显著增加。
Objective To study the stress change of the superior facet joint after artificial disc replacement, compare the result with spinal fusion and provide theoretical evidences for ADR in clinical treatment. Methods A total of six fresh human cadaveric lumbosacral spines (L2-S1) were used in this investigation. Each specimen was prepared to three models: intact spine, artificial disc replacement in L4/5 and spinal fusion in L4/5. The specimens were reconstructed by total disc replacement in L4/5 before spinal fusion. A stress sensor was implanted in L3/4 facet joint and the stress was measured under axial rotation, extension and lateral bending, with pure, unconstrained moments(±7.5Nm). Results Under simulated-physiological loading conditions, compared with the intact condition, stress in superior facet joint was similar with that of the ADR condition and the difference was insignificant (P＞0.05). However, stress in superior facet joint was remarkably increased after spinal fusion compared with the intact condition and the ADR condition（P＜0.05）. Conclusion The stress of superior facet joint was well maintained after artificial disc replacement, and remarkably increased after spinal fusion.
人工腰椎间盘置换术 / 生物力学 / 腰椎 / 小关节应力 / 椎间融合
Artificial disc replacement / Biomechanics / Lumbar spine / Facet joint / Spinal fusion
[1] Adoqwa O, Owens R, Karikari I, et al. Revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, adjacent-segment disease, or same-level recurrent stenosisi. Part 2. A cost-effectiveness analysis
[J]. Neurosurg Spine, 2012,24(5):1343-1351.
[2] Kim HJ, Kang KT, Moon SH, et al. The quantitative assessment of risk factors to overstress at adjacent segments after lumbar fusion: removal of posterior ligments and pedicle screws
[J]. Spine,2011,36(17):1367-1373.
[3] Paul CP, Zuiderbaan HA, Zandieh Doulabi B, et al. Simulated-physiological loading conditions preserve biological and mechanical properties of caprine lumbar intervertebral discs in ex vivo culture
[J]. Plos One,2012,7(3):1-12.
[4] 瞿东滨，郑兆聪．脊柱的生物力学
[M]//金大地，瞿东滨，CharlesD．Ray．脊柱椎间关节成形术．北京：科学技术文献出版社，2004：30-55.
[5] 肖进，原林，赵卫东，等. 身体姿势对腰椎小关节手里的影响
[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志，2003,21(1):87-89.
[6] Geol VK, Grauer JN, Patel TCh, et al. Effects of Charite Artificial Disc on the implanted and adjacent spinal segments mechanics using a hybrid testing protocol
[J]. Spine, 2005,35(24):2755-2764.
[7] Moore RJ, Crotti TN, Osti OL, et al. Osteoarthrosisi of the facet joints resulting from anular rim lesoins in sheep lumbar disc
[J]. Spine, 1999,24(6):519-525.
[8] Putzier M，Funk JF，Schneider SV, et al．Charite total disc replacement-clinical and radiographical results after an average follow-up 0f 17 years
[J]．Eur Spine J. 2006,15(2)：183-195．
[9] Katsimihas M, Bailey CS, Issa K, et al. Prospective clinical and radiographic results of Charite III artificial total disc arthroplasty at 2- to 7-year follow-up: a Canadian experience
[J]. Research, 2010,3(6): 408-414.
[10]Guyer RD, McAfee PC, Banco RJ, et al. Prospective, randomized, multicenter food and drug administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the Charite artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up
[J]. Spine J, 2009, 9(5):374-386.
[11]Zigler JE. Five-year results of the ProDisc-L multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing ProDisc-L with circumferential spinal fusion for single-level disabling degenerative disk disease
[J]. Spine Surgery, 2012, 24(1):25-31.
[12] Shim CS, Lee SH, Shin HD, et al. CHARITE versus ProDisc: a comparative study of a minimum 3-year follow-up
[J].Spine,2007(32):1012-1018.
[13] Siepe CJ, Mayer HM, Heinz-Leisenheimer M, et al. A Total lumbar disc replacement: different results for different levels
[J]. Spine,2007(32):782-790.
[14]van Ooij A, Oner FC, Verbout AJ, et al. Complications of artificial disc replacement: a report of 27 patients with the SB Charite disc
[J]. Spine 2003,28(0):369-383.
[15]Jin YJ, Kim YE, Seo JH, et al. Effects of rod stiffness and fusion mass on the adjacent segments after floating mono-segmental fusion: a study using finite element analysis
[J]. Eur Spine J, 2013, 22(5):1066-1077.
[16]Kim TY, Kang KT, Yoon do H, et al. Effects of lumbar arthrodesis on adjacent segments:differences between surgical techniques
[J]. Spine,2012,37(17):1456-1462.
[17]Kim HJ, Chun HJ, Kang KT, et al. The biomechanical effect of pedicle screws’ insertion angle and position on the superior adjacent segment in 1 segment lumbar fusion
[J]. Spine, 2012, 37(19):1637-1644.
[18]Wang JC, Arnold PM, Hermsmever JT, et al. Do lumbar motion preserving devices reduce the risk of adjacent segment pathology compared with fusion surgery? Asystematic review
[J]. Spine, 2012, 37(22 Suppl):S133-143.
[19] Ha SK, Kim SH, Kim DH, et al. Biomechanical study of lumbar spinal arthroplasty with a semi-constrained artificial disc(Active L) in the human cadaveric spine
[J]. J Korean Neurosurg Soc, 2009,45(3):169-175.
[20]胡新佳, 李康华. 腰椎间盘切除与人工椎间盘置换前后上位关节突关节内压力改变
[J].中国修复重建外科杂志, 2005, 19(6):427-430.
[21]Boden SD, Davis DO, Dina TS, et al. Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects. A prospective investigation
[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1990, 72(3):403-408.
[22]Borenstein DG, O’Mara JW Jr, Boden SD, et al. The value of magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine to predict low-back pain in asymptomatic subjects: a seven-year follow-up study
[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2001,83(9):1306-1311.
京ICP备08002354号-3/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
