CT anatomical study of  influential factors on the distance between abdominal aorta and left psoas major muscle

Gao Jun, Li Yuwei, Wu Hang, Li Sashuang, Yang Kaile, Dong Peng

Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy ›› 2024, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5) : 595-600.

PDF(2991 KB)
PDF(2991 KB)
Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy ›› 2024, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5) : 595-600. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2024.5.19

CT anatomical study of  influential factors on the distance between abdominal aorta and left psoas major muscle

  • Gao Jun1,2, Li Yuwei1,2, Wu Hang1,2, Li Sashuang1, Yang Kaile1, Dong Peng1,2*
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective To measure the distance between the abdominal aorta and the left psoas major (DALP) at different levels based on CT images and analyzed its influential factors. Methods The CT and clinical data of 116 normal adults were retrospectively analyzed. The following measurements were taken: DALP, diameter of the left psoas major, cross-sectional area (CSA) of the psoas major, aortic diameter, transverse diameter and area of the L2 vertebral body, thickness of anterior abdominal wall fat at L2 and navel level, subcutaneous fat area (SFA), visceral fat area (VFA) at L2 and navel level. Additionally, VFA/SFA ratios were calculated at both L2 and navel levels. The radiographic density, density standard deviation and radiographic density ratio (RDR) of the left psoas major muscle at three intervertebral disc levels of L2-L5 were measured in 82 patients. The correlation between the DALP and other data at three intervertebral disc levels of L2-L5 was analyzed, and the regression equation was calculated. Results The DALP decreased from level L2 toL5. Age was positively correlated with DALP at L2-L5 disc level (all  P<0.01).The DALP at the L2-L3 disc level was negatively correlated with the CSA of the psoas major at the L2-L3 disc level (P<0.01), and positively correlated with the VFA/SFA at L2 level (P<0.05). The DALP was negatively correlated with the CSA of the psoas major at the L3-L4 disc level (P<0.01), and positively correlated with the VFA/SFA at L2 level (P<0.01).  The DALP was negatively correlated with the CSA of the psoas major at L4-L5 disc level (P<0.01), and positively correlated with the VFA/SFA at L2 level (P<0.05). Conclusions On CT images, the distance between the abdominal aorta and the left psoas major was influenced by age, CSA of the psoas major and the VFA/SFA at L2 level. Preoperative CT examination is of great significance in guiding the OLIF operation.

Key words

CT /   /   / Abdominal aorta /   /   / Psoas major /   /   / Influential factors /   /   / Distance

Cite this article

Download Citations
Gao Jun, Li Yuwei, Wu Hang, Li Sashuang, Yang Kaile, Dong Peng. CT anatomical study of  influential factors on the distance between abdominal aorta and left psoas major muscle[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy. 2024, 42(5): 595-600 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2024.5.19

References

[1] Silvestre C, Mac-Thiong JM, Hilmi R, et al. Complications and morbidities of mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion: oblique lumbar interbody fusion in 179 patients[J]. Asian Spine J, 2012, 6(2): 89-97. DOI: 10.4184/asj.2012.6.2.89.
[2]  韩孟龙. 磁共振3D COSMIC序列在斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术术前评估的应用研究[D]. 衡阳: 南华大学, 2021. DOI: 10.27234/d.cnki.gnhuu.2021.000849.
[3] Wang Z, Liu L, Xu XH, et al. The OLIF working corridor based on magnetic resonance imaging: a retrospective research[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2020, 15(1): 141. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-020-01654-1.
[4]  何华, 孙曾梅, 唐蜀西, 等. Image J测量CT扫描图像脂肪面积的应用[J]. 广东医学,2017, 38(2): 255-258. DOI: 10.13820/j.cnki.gdyx. 2017. 02.016.
[5]  常云峰. 应用放射学方法测量活体胸腰椎推算身高[D]. 成都: 四川大学, 2006.
[6] Mayer HM. A new microsurgical technique for minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1997, 22(6): 691-699, 700. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199703150-00023.
[7]  Julian Li JX, Mobbs RJ, Phan K. Morphometric MRI imag-ing study of the corridor for the oblique lumbar interbodyfusion technique at L1~L5[J]. World Neurosurg, 2018,111: e678-e685. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu. 2017.12.136.
[8]  Liu L, Liang Y, Zhang H, et al. Imaging anatomical research on the operative windows of oblique lumbar interbody fusion[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(9): e0163452. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163452.
[9]  Davis TT, Hynes RA, Fung DA, et al. Retroperitoneal oblique corridor to the L2~S1 intervertebral discs in the lateral position: an anatomic study[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2014, 21(5): 785-793. DOI: 10.3171/2014.7.SPINE13564.
[10]Boghani Z, Steele WI, Barber SM, et al. Variability in the size of the retroperitoneal oblique corridor: a magnetic resonance imaging-based analysis[J]. Surg Neurol Int, 2020, 11: 54. DOI: 10.25259/SNI_438_2019.
[11] 左玉强, 柳青, 关兴, 等. CT定量测量骨骼肌脂肪浸润程度预测老年肌少症价值分析[J]. 临床放射学杂志, 2021, 40(11): 2173-2177. DOI: 10.13437/j.cnki.jcr.2021.11.027.
[12] Aringhieri G, Salle DG, Catanese S, et al. Abdominal visceral-to-subcutaneous fat volume ratio predicts survival and response to first-line palliative chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer[J]. Cancers, 2023, 15(22): 5391. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15225391.
[13]Ozoya OO, Siegel EM, Srikumar T, et al. Quantitative assessment of visceral obesity and postoperative colon cancer outcomes[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2017, 21(3): 534-542. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-017-3362-9.
[14]黄露, 王哲涛, 罗凤鸣. 腹部脂肪分布与肺通气功能的关系研究[J]. 华西医学, 2022, 37(1): 27-32. DOI: 10.7507/1002-0179.202012128.
[15]贺用礼, 刘平均, 王长青, 等. 胸腰椎影像学测量及其临床意义[J]. 中国现代医药杂志, 2012, 14(9): 7-10. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9463. 2012. 09.003.
PDF(2991 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/