拮抗剂方案新鲜胚胎移植和冻融胚胎移植临床结局比较

doi:10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2024.2.11

Abstract

Abstract: Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of fresh embryo transfer and frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) in the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-A) protocol. Method The clinical data of 2575 women undergoing GnRH antagonist protocol cycle, including 1328 cases of fresh embryo transfer and 1247 cases of FET were retrospectively analyzed. Results The AMH level and AFC in the FET group were significantly higher than those in the fresh embryo transfer group (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in other baseline characteristics between the two group (P>0.05). The FSH level on hCG day in the FET group was significantly lower than that in the fresh embryo transfer group, and E2, P level on hCG day in the FET group were significantly higher than those in the fresh embryo transfer group (P<0.05). The total number of oocytes retrieved, matured oocyte, high-quality embryos in the FET group were significantly higher than those in the fresh embryo transfer group (P<0.05). The mean number of embryos transfer in the FET group was significantly lower than that in the fresh embryo transfer group, the clinical pregnancy rate, implantation rate and live birth rate in the FET group were significantly higher than those in the fresh embryo transfer group, the ectopic pregnancy rate and the multiple pregnancy rate in the FET group were significantly lower than those in the fresh embryo transfer group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of moderate-severe OHSS, miscarriage rate, incidence of GDM and gestational hypertension between the two groups (P>0.05). The singleton birth weight in the FET group was significantly higher than that in the fresh embryo transfer group, with statistical difference (P<0.05). Conclusions In the GnRH antagonist protocol cycle, FET can obtain good clinical outcome and can be used as an effective supplemental regimen.

Key words: GnRH antagonist protocol, , , Fresh embryo transfer, , , Frozen-thawed embryo transfer, Whole embryo freezing

CLC Number:

R711.6

Sun Li, Li Xinxin, Li Yue, Ge Mingxiao, Ou Jianping, Ge Shuqi. Comparison of the clinical outcomes between fresh embryo transfer and frozen-thawed embryo transfer in the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2024, 42(2): 181-185.

References

[1] Grow D, Kawwass JF, Kulkarni AD, et al. GnRH agonist and GnRH antagonist protocols: comparison of outcomes among good-prognosis patients using national surveillance data[J]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2014,29(3):299-304. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.05.007.
[2] Roque M, Valle M, Guimaraes F, et al. Freeze-all policy: fresh vs. frozen-thawed embryo transfer[J]. Fertil Steril, 2015,103(5):1190-1193. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.01.045.
[3] Ozgur K, Bulut H, Berkkanoglu M, et al. Frozen embryo transfer can be performed in the cycle immediately following the freeze-all cycle[J]. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2018,35(1):135-142. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-017-1048-6.
[4] Isikoglu M. Is it too early for a major change? A critical objection to the freeze all policy[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2016,293(6):1359-1360. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-016-4039-4.
[5] Vuong LN, Dang VQ, Ho TM, et al. IVF Transfer of Fresh or Frozen Embryos in Women without Polycystic Ovaries[J]. N Engl J Med, 2018,378(2):137-147. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1703768.
[6] Jing M, Lin C, Zhu W, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of GnRH-agonist long-protocol and GnRH-antagonist protocol for in vitro fertilization[J]. Sci Rep, 2020,10(1):8732. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-65558-0.
[7] Al-Inany HG, Youssef MA, Ayeleke RO, et al. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists for assisted reproductive technology[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2016,4(4):CD1750. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001750.
[8] Simon C, Moreau J, Gatimel N, et al. Impact of estradiol and progesterone levels during the late follicular stage on the outcome of GnRH antagonist protocols[J]. Gynecol Endocrinol, 2019,35(6):481-484. DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2018.1538346.
[9] Racca A, Santos-Ribeiro S, De Munck N, et al. Impact of late-follicular phase elevated serum progesterone on cumulative live birth rates: is there a deleterious effect on embryo quality?[J]. Hum Reprod, 2018,33(5):860-868. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dey031.
[10] Simon C, Branet L, Moreau J, et al. Association between progesterone to number of mature oocytes index and live birth in GnRH antagonist protocols[J]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2019, 38(6):901-907. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.01.009.
[11] Tomas C, Toftager M, Lossl K, et al. Perinatal outcomes in 521 gestations after fresh and frozen cycles: a secondary outcome of a randomized controlled trial comparing GnRH antagonist versus GnRH agonist protocols[J]. Reprod Biomed Online, 2019,39(4):659-664. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.05.010.
[12] Huang MC, Tzeng SL, Lee CI, et al. GnRH agonist long protocol versus GnRH antagonist protocol for various aged patients with diminished ovarian reserve: A retrospective study[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(11):e207081. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207081.
[13] Zhai XH, Zhang P, Wu FX, et al. GnRH antagonist for patients with polycystic ovary syndrome undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in fresh cycles[J]. Exp Ther Med, 2017,13(6):3097-3102. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2017.4309.
[14] Trounson A, Mohr L. Human pregnancy following cryopreservation, thawing and transfer of an eight-cell embryo[J]. Nature, 1983, 305(5936):707-709. DOI: 10.1038/305707a0.
[15] Zeilmaker GH, Alberda AT, van Gent I, et al. Two pregnancies following transfer of intact frozen-thawed embryos[J]. Fertil Steril, 1984,42(2):293-296. DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)48029-5.
[16] Liebermann J. Vitrification: A Simple and Successful Method for Cryostorage of Human Blastocysts[J]. Methods Mol Biol, 2021,2180:501-515. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-0783-1_24.
[17] Nagy ZP, Shapiro D, Chang CC. Vitrification of the human embryo: a more efficient and safer in vitro fertilization treatment[J]. Fertil Steril, 2020,113(2):241-247. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.12.009.
[18] Chen T, Li B, Shi H, et al. Reproductive Outcomes of Single Embryo Transfer in Women with Previous Cesarean Section[J]. Reprod Sci, 2021,28(4):1049-1059. DOI: 10.1007/s43032-020-00345-w.
[19] Blockeel C, Drakopoulos P, Santos-Ribeiro S, et al. A fresh look at the freeze-all protocol: a SWOT analysis[J]. Hum Reprod, 2016,31(3):491-497. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dev339.
[20] Chen ZJ, Shi Y, Sun Y, et al. Fresh versus Frozen Embryos for Infertility in the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome[J]. N Engl J Med, 2016, 375(6):523-533. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1513873.
[21] Shi Y, Sun Y, Hao C, et al. Transfer of Fresh versus Frozen Embryos in Ovulatory Women[J]. N Engl J Med, 2018, 378(2):126-136. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1705334.
[22] Roque M, Valle M, Sampaio M, et al. Does freeze-all policy affect IVF outcome in poor ovarian responders?[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2018,52(4):530-534. DOI: 10.1002/uog.19000.
[23] Roque M, Valle M, Sampaio M, et al. Obstetric outcomes after fresh versus frozen-thawed embryo transfers: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. JBRA Assist Reprod, 2018, 22(3):253-260. DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20180049.

Comparison of the clinical outcomes between fresh embryo transfer and frozen-thawed embryo transfer in the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	Liu Zihao, Liu Jiaming, Yan Jinxiang, Wu Jiabao, Huang Shanhu, Zhang Zhihong, Liu Zhili. Anatomical measurement of the new double-threaded pedicle screw in the lower cervical spine [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2024, 42(2): 121-125.
[2]	Chen Junlin, Ma Xiangyang, Zou Xiaobao, Fu Suochao, Zhu Changrong, Deng Chenfu, Ma Rencai, Chen Zexing, Xia Hong. Imaging measurement and feasibility analysis of C_2/3 transarticular transpedicular screw [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2024, 42(2): 126-130.
[3]	Zheng Yifan, Chen Jianan, Pei Xuan, Zhou Wei, Fang Zhixun, Cheng Yipeng, Liu Ximing. Digital anatomic study of the secure placement of screw on posterior column wall of acetabulum [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2024, 42(2): 131-135.
[4]	Yang Tao, Gao Zhuan, Liu Bingzhi, Li Wuchao, Sun Ruizhe, Lang Yuying, Li Jing. Anatomical features of the posterior bundle of the ulnar collateral ligament and clinical significance [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2024, 42(2): 136-139.
[5]	Zhuo Hang, Zhou Zelin, Wu Yu, Gong Yan, Song Zefeng, Yan Xianwei, Shen Zi, Lu Guoliang, Liang De, Jiang Xiaobing, Yu Xiang. Anatomical parameter analysis of lumbar basivertebral foramen in middle-aged and elderly based on MRI [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2024, 42(2): 140-144.
[6]	Li Jiawei, Zhang Kai, Ding Liangjia, Wang Haiyan, Chen Qingwei, Liu Qi, Yu Xiaoming, Lan Wenjie, Li Xiaohe. Digital assessment of prosthesis position in hip replacement in Inner Mongolia [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2024, 42(2): 145-152.
[7]	Fang Yuan, Kang Zhijie, Wang Haiyan, Sha Lirong, Li Xiaohe, Jin Feng, Qi Xin, Wang Yanchao, Zhang Yunfeng. 3D digital measurement of sacral shape and relative position of symphysis pubis in minors and its clinical significance [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2024, 42(2): 153-158.
[8]	Wu Jiabao, Sun Bolin, Xing Kai, Zhang Ning, Zhou Rongping, Chen Jiangwei, Liu Zhili, Liu Jiaming. Anatomical features of the spinal canal in degenerative lumbar scoliosis and its correlation with spinal-pelvic parameters [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2024, 42(2): 159-167.
[9]	Yang Xianwen, Wang Fei, Cheng Fubin, Liao Liqing. Anatomic study of occlusive treatment of scapulohumeral periarthritis [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2024, 42(2): 168-173.
[10]	Hou Xiaorui, Li Haokun, Song Yifang, Chang Ruoshui, Xue Xiaolei, Zhang Qianbing, Wu Sha, Wang Nisha. Screening and analysis of key genes in macrophages of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2024, 42(2): 174-180.
[11]	Zhang Fan, Wei Huanjie, Li Long, Ouyang Tao, Cai Juan, Liang Qiuling, Zeng Yuhui. Effect and mechanism of Phillyrin on acute lung injury in septic shock mice [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2024, 42(2): 186-190.
[12]	Ruan Lei, Huang Bo, Wang Lanlan, Xue Huitian, Sun Menglong, Duan Miaomiao, Peng Liang. The effect of tui na rolling on post-injury inflammation and fibrosis in rabbits in a model of blunt contusion of skeletal muscles [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2024, 42(2): 191-195.
[13]	Liu Ruiping, Qian Lei, Liu Yanyan, Wan Xinzhu, Chen Chunyan, Wang Yining, Yu Wanqi, Ouyang Jun. Muscle synergy analysis during the sit-to-stand movement in elderly individuals with a history of falling [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2024, 42(2): 196-200.
[14]	Zhang Yunhao, Fan Kai, Huang Congjun, Cheng Qiangqiang, Wang Guanyan, Xiao Youping, Mei Aobing. Research on the application of three-dimensional visualization technology based on CT image data fusion and digital urology virtual diagnosis and treatmen in adrenal tumors [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2024, 42(2): 201-207.
[15]	Shen Jiangjiang, Liu Zhihong, Liu Baohui. Clinical observation of primary trigeminal neuralgia treated by neuroendoscopy combined with microvascular decompression under microscope [J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy, 2024, 42(2): 208-212.