Influence of pedicled artery position on the survival of multi-territory perforator flap

Qiu Yujun, Fu Yu, Su Hang, Yin Siyuan, Wang Yueqing, Tang Maolin, Xi Shanshan

Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy ›› 2022, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6) : 660-664.

PDF(8149 KB)
PDF(8149 KB)
Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy ›› 2022, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6) : 660-664. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2022.6.06

Influence of pedicled artery position on the survival of multi-territory perforator flap

  • Qiu Yujun1, Fu Yu1, Su Hang1, Yin Siyuan1, Wang Yueqing1, Tang Maolin2, Xi Shanshan1*
Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective    To investigate the influence of the pedicled artery position on the survival of multi-territory perforator flap.    Methods   Thirty-two Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into two groups: a control group, only the right iliolumbar artery and vein were preserved; and an experimental group, only the right iliolumbar vein and the left iliolumbar artery were preserved. At 7 days after operation, the survival of the flap was counted. Arteriography was performed to observe the dilation of the choke arteries, and HE staining microscope was used to measure the intraluminal diameter of the choke artery.    Results   At 7 days after operation, the survival rate of the flap in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group[ (85.5±2.9)% vs (68.9±2.6)%, P<0.001]. The dilation of the choke1 artery was comparable in both groups [(46.93±6.21) μm vs (46.79±6.69) μm, P>0.05], whereas the choke 2 artery in the experimental group was more dilated than that in the control group[(66.08±6.78) μm vs (46.00±6.90) μm, P<0.001].    Conclusions   The position change of the pedicled artery can promote the dilation of the choke artery and the blood supply to the distal part of the flap, so as to increase the survival rate of multi-territory perforator flap.

Key words

Arterial pressure difference /   /   / Choke artery /   /   / Multi-territory perforator flap /   /   / Angiosome

Cite this article

Download Citations
Qiu Yujun, Fu Yu, Su Hang, Yin Siyuan, Wang Yueqing, Tang Maolin, Xi Shanshan. Influence of pedicled artery position on the survival of multi-territory perforator flap[J]. Chinese Journal of Clinical Anatomy. 2022, 40(6): 660-664 https://doi.org/10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2022.6.06

References

[1]  Cormack GC, Lamberty BG. A classification of fascio-cutaneous flaps  according to their patterns of vascularisation[J]. Br J Plast Surge, 1984, 37(1): 80-87. DOI: 10.1016/0007-1226(84)90049-3.
[2] Chubb DP, Taylor GI, Ashton MW. True and "choke" anastomoses between perforator angiosomes: part ii. dynamic thermographic identification[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2013, 132(6): 1457-1464. DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000434407.73390.82.
[3]  Taylor GI, Corlett RJ, Ashton MW. The functional angiosome: clinical implications of the anatomical concept[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2017, 140(4): 721-733. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003694.
[4] Coroneos CJ, Heller AM, Voineskos SH, et al. SIEA versus DIEP arterial complications: a cohort study[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2015, 135(5): 802E-807E. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001150.
[5]  Park SO, Cho J, Imanishi N, et al. Effect of distal venous drainage on the survival of four-territory flaps with no pedicle vein: results from a rat model[J]. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 2018, 71(3): 410-415. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2017.09.001.
[6]  郑俊, 习珊珊, 李红, 等. 静脉超引流与动脉增压对皮瓣存活的影响[J]. 解剖学报, 2016, 47(3): 359-364. DOI: 10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2016.03.012.
[7]  Nedomansky J, Nickl S, Radtke C, et al. Venous superdrainage in DIEP flap breast reconstruction: the impact of superficial inferior epigastric vein dissection on abdominal seroma formation[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2018, 141(2): 206E-212E. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004017.
[8] Pignatti M, Pinto V, Giorgini FA, et al. Meta-analysis of the effects of venous super-drainage in deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps for breast reconstruction[J]. Microsurgery, 2021, 41(2): 186-195. DOI: 10.1002/micr.30682.
[9]  Wang X, Pan J, Xiao D, et al. Comparison of arterial supercharging and venous superdrainage on improvement of survival of the extended perforator flap in rats[J]. Microsurgery, 2020, 40(8): 874-880. DOI: 10.1002/micr.30660.
[10]Xu H, Zhang Z, Tao W, et al. Ex vivo delay: a novel approach to increase prefabricated flaps survival rate[J]. J Reconstr Microsurg, 2016, 32(8): 632-638. DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1584809.
[11]Yang DP, Zhang P. Facial resurfacing with prefabricated induced expanded skin flap[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2019, 30(4): 1131-1134. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000005152.
[12]Dhar SC, Taylor GI. The delay phenomenon: the story unfolds[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 1999, 104(7): 2079-2091. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199912000-00021.
[13]Jiang Z, Li X, Chen M, et al. Effect of endogenous vascular endothelial growth factor on flap surgical delay in a rat flap model[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg,2019, 143(1): 126-135. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.000000000 0005145.
[14]Ding J, Feng X, Gao W, et al. Comparison of a small central versus a large peripheral perforator in a rat model of extended dorsal three-vascular territory perforator flap[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2017, 139(2): 434E-443E. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002991.
[15]程晟, 习珊珊, 林东辉, 等. 联体皮瓣的静脉引流位置对动脉血流导向功能的影响[J]. 解剖学报, 2018, 49(5): 651-656. DOI: 10.16098/j.issn.0529-1356.2018.05.015.
[16]程晟, 习珊珊, 何耀之, 等. 穿支皮瓣Choke区动、静脉血流阻力对皮瓣存活的影响[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2018, 36(6): 648-651, 656. DOI: 10.13418/j.issn.1001-165x.2018.06.010.
[17]Xi SS, Cheng S, Meng FM, et al. Effects of arterial blood supply and venous return on multi-territory perforator flap survival[J]. J Plast Surg Hand Surg, 2020, 54(3): 187-193. DOI: 10.1080/2000656X.2020.1746665.
[18]Zheng J, Xi SS, Ding MC, et al. Effects of Venous superdrainage and arterial supercharging on dorsal perforator flap in a rat model[J]. PloS One, 2016, 11(8): e0160942. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160942.
[19]Xi S, Cheng S, Lou J, et al. A preliminary study of the effects of venous drainage position on arterial blood supply and venous return within the conjoined flap[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2019, 143(2): 322E-328E. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005256.
[20]Yamamoto Y, Sakurai H, Nakazawa H, et al. Effect of vascular augmentation on the haemodynamics and survival area in a rat abdominal perforator flap model[J]. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg, 2009, 62(2): 244-249. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.11.078.
[21]Zhang Y, Wang TL, Wei J, et al. What's the remedy for the distal necrosis of DIEP flap, better venous drain or more arterial supply[J]? PloS One, 2017, 12(2): e0171651. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171651.
[22]Fang F, Liu M, Xiao J, et al. Arterial supercharging is more beneficial to flap survival due to quadruple dilation of venules[J]. J Surg Res, 2020, 247: 490-498. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.09.056.
[23]Lee KT, Mun GH. Benefits of superdrainage using SIEV in DIEP flap breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Microsurgery, 2017, 37(1): 75-83. DOI: 10.1002/micr.22420.
[24]Herlin C, Bekara F, Bertheuil N, et al. Venous supercharging reduces complications and improves outcomes of distally based sural flaps[J]. J Reconstr Microsurg, 2017, 33(5): 343-351. DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1598620.
PDF(8149 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/